Re: [bluetooth] General comments about the codes

[Puloma Mukherjee <puloma@ece.sunysb.edu>]

alright I have made a note of that...but I dont understand what you mean
by
using defined constants...?I would appreciate it if you can explain.
After making these changes within the next one week and  i will send it
directly to your account if
that
is ok.Also I will be working on access code generator/ corelator block in
the following week,please let me know if someone is already doing it.This
week it doesnt look like it will be possible,but
next week for sure.
Also, if it is not a problem for people on this list to reveal,I want to
know where you all are working,for what companies?
Thankyou,
Regards,
Puloma

On Thu, 22 May 2003, Jamil Khatib wrote:

> 
> Hi,
> I made a quick review over the files I got on the mailing list (FH selector,
> CRC, HEC & FEC) I would like from all of you to try to put teh display
> function within an if statments that are executed when simulation variable is
> defined so that I do not need to comment and uncomment them whenever I want
> to synthesize the code.
> Another comment that I highly recommend you using defined constants such
> those I defined in the contansts package for VHDL code which is available in
> the CVS.
> 
> Could you please update your files according to these two comments while I go
> into deep review. Anyhow I can not synthesize the files easly without
> following the first note.
> 
> Regards,
> Jamil Khatib
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from bluetooth mailing list please visit http://www.opencores.org/mailinglists.shtml
> 

--
To unsubscribe from bluetooth mailing list please visit http://www.opencores.org/mailinglists.shtml