Re: [openrisc] Immediate value in l.nop instruction

[Carlos Sánchez de La Lama <csanchez@teisa.unican.es>]

Damian,

I've modified GCC from opencores cvs to work with binutils from GNU. I realize 
that binutils from opencores are the development version and should therefore 
be taken as the newest version, but or32 support in GNU's official binutils 
has just be added and files seem to have been written recently by you (Damjan 
Lampret), so I'm not really sure about which is the good one. Do you mean 
or32 supoprt in oficial binutils is out-of-date?

Best regards,

	Carlos Sanchez de La Lama <csanchez@teisa.unican.es>

> Carlos,
>
> which version are you modfying, the one from opencores cvs or the one from
> gnu?
>
> Opencores cvs is the development version and once it is stable it moves to
> gnu folks, which means the gnu version needs to be updated in this case.
>
> regards,
> Damjan
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Carlos Sánchez de La Lama" <csanchez@teisa.unican.es>
> To: <openrisc@opencores.org>
> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 6:57 PM
> Subject: [openrisc] Immediate value in l.nop instruction
>
> > Hello!
> >
> > It looks like the current release of binutils (2.13.2.1) has support for
> > OpenRISC, so I switched to it instead of using snapshots from Opencores
>
> CVS
>
> > server. But the assembler in that release will only accept a l.nop
> > instruction if it comes with an immediate value as argument. And the
>
> ".half"
>
> > directive is no longer supported.
> >
> > To make GCC work with that version, small source changes are required.
>
> I've
>
> > done it, but I don't know what is better: shlould I attach a patchfile,
> > or should I upload changes to CVS server? Please tell me.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Carlos Sanchez de La Lama <csanchez@teisa.unican.es>
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from openrisc mailing list please visit
>
> http://www.opencores.org/mailinglists.shtml
--
To unsubscribe from openrisc mailing list please visit http://www.opencores.org/mailinglists.shtml