Re: 回信： [openrisc] saving/restoring context at exceptions

["Damjan Lampret" <lampret@opencores.org>]

Yeah it makes sense to align to 16 bit since we don't have mixed insns
anymore.

regards,
Damjan

----- Original Message -----
From: <jimmy87@sunplus.com.tw>
To: <openrisc@opencores.org>
Cc: <lampret@opencores.org>
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2000 10:47 AM
Subject: Re: 回信： [openrisc] saving/restoring context at exceptions


>
>
> Damjan,
> of course, address should be aligned to multiple of 2.
> If address is multiple of 4, the address space will be wasted..
> RTL is designed according to this rule.
> Best regards, Jimmy
>
>
>
>
>
> "Damjan Lampret" <lampret@opencores.org> 於 2000/06/12 03:07:35 PM
>
> 請回應 給 openrisc@opencores.org
>
> 收件人：  openrisc@opencores.org
> 副本抄送： (副本密送： jimmy87/Sunplus)
>
> 主旨：    Re: 回信： [openrisc] saving/restoring context at exceptions
>
>
>
>
> I was afraid of that since OR16 has 16 bit insns. But I thought all
fetches
> are from addresses aligned to 32-bit boundaries. Was this changes to
> addresses aligned to 16 bits?
>
> --damjan
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <jimmy87@sunplus.com.tw>
> To: <openrisc@opencores.org>
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2000 7:59 AM
> Subject: Re: 回信： [openrisc] saving/restoring context at exceptions
>
>
> >
> >
> > hm...then..it's a problem to OR16 ...
> > since only one bit is vacant in EPCR...
> > really bad..
> > Best regards, Jimmy
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>