[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [openrisc] FW: [ECOS] Harvard architecture MLT files

To: openrisc@opencores.org
Subject: Re: [openrisc] FW: [ECOS] Harvard architecture MLT files
From: Scott Furman <sfurman@rosum.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 10:15:47 -0700
In-Reply-To: <200307021847.h62Il0OJ021111@www.opencores.org>
References: <200307021847.h62Il0OJ021111@www.opencores.org>
Reply-To: openrisc@opencores.org
Sender: owner-openrisc@opencores.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312

rcc@jennic.com wrote:

>In the meantime, which do you think is more complete? UC 2.95.3 
>version or OpenCores 3.2.3 version?
>  
>
I don't know the answer to which compiler is more complete, but I can 
tell you that I have been using OpenCores 3.2.3 for all our eCos work 
since Day 1, without problems so far.  (I focus on eCos because that 
seems to be your area of interest.)

-Scott


--
To unsubscribe from openrisc mailing list please visit http://www.opencores.org/mailinglists.shtml

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [openrisc] FW: [ECOS] Harvard architecture MLT files
  - From: "Robert Cragie" <rcc@jennic.com>

References:
- Re: [openrisc] FW: [ECOS] Harvard architecture MLT files
  - From: rcc@jennic.com

Prev by Date: Re: [openrisc] FW: [ECOS] Harvard architecture MLT files
Next by Date: RE: [openrisc] Cache Line Fill
Prev by thread: Re: [openrisc] FW: [ECOS] Harvard architecture MLT files
Next by thread: RE: [openrisc] FW: [ECOS] Harvard architecture MLT files
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread