RE: [ethmac] IFG

["Illan Glasner" <iglasner@zumanetworks.com>]

5-Jul-01

   Hi,

         Well all depend again on for what you plan to use the MAC but
while doing so it is perfectly correct I would support also smaller IFG
as low as you can simple to allow in case on point to point connection
to increase the bandwith which for small packet this 96BT is big
penelty.

have a nice day

   Illan


-----Original Message-----
From: Igor Mohor (uni-mb) [mailto:igor.mohor@uni-mb.si]
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 11:34 PM
To: ethmac@opencores.org
Subject: RE: [ethmac] IFG


Why not?

Any packet coming in before the IFG is a collided packet.

Regards,
	Igor

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ethmac@opencores.org [mailto:owner-ethmac@opencores.org]On
> Behalf Of Illan Glasner
> Sent: 04. julij 2001 2:31
> To: ethmac@opencores.org
> Subject: RE: [ethmac] IFG
> 
> 
> 3-Jul-01
> 
>    Igor Hi,
> 
>        Even tho' I understand you are doing it, my question is why do
> you want to do it ?
> 
> have a nice day
> 
>    Illan
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Igor Mohor (uni-mb) [mailto:igor.mohor@uni-mb.si]
> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 1:31 AM
> To: ethmac@opencores.org
> Subject: RE: [ethmac] IFG
> 
> 
> I'm doing that, I just wanted to know whether the number is OK.
> 
> Regards,
> 	Igor
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-ethmac@opencores.org
[mailto:owner-ethmac@opencores.org]On
> > Behalf Of Illan Glasner
> > Sent: 28. junij 2001 4:25
> > To: ethmac@opencores.org
> > Subject: RE: [ethmac] IFG
> > 
> > 
> > 27-Jun-01
> > 
> >    Hi,
> > 
> >         why do you want to drop packet that have IFG smaller than
96BT
> ?
> > 
> > (use BT=BitTime it make it simpler as than no need to define 10M or
> > 100M) 
> > 
> > have a nice day
> > 
> >    Illan
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Igor Mohor (uni-mb) [mailto:igor.mohor@uni-mb.si]
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 4:03 PM
> > To: Ethmac@Opencores. Org
> > Subject: [ethmac] IFG
> > 
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I have a question regarding IFG. At reception I want to drop packets
> > that
> > have
> > IFG smaller than 9600 ns (960 ns). Is the value 9600 ns OK or should
> it
> > be
> > something
> > less? I'm counting the IFG while receiver is the idle state (Data
> valid
> > from
> > PHY not
> > active).
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 	Igor
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from ethmac mailing list please visit
> > http://www.opencores.org/mailinglists.shtml
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from ethmac mailing list please visit 
> http://www.opencores.org/mailinglists.shtml
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from ethmac mailing list please visit
> http://www.opencores.org/mailinglists.shtml
> --
> To unsubscribe from ethmac mailing list please visit 
> http://www.opencores.org/mailinglists.shtml
> 
--
To unsubscribe from ethmac mailing list please visit
http://www.opencores.org/mailinglists.shtml
--
To unsubscribe from ethmac mailing list please visit http://www.opencores.org/mailinglists.shtml