RE: Interesting small browsers

From: Bob Romprey (zoot@farts.com)
Date: Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:32:32 CEST

('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is) The only bad experience I had using arachne for DOS, was that arachne used the defined DOS temp directory as it's cache.
By default M$ DOS 6.2 defined it's temp as C:\DOS, so upon dumping ones cache one also dumps ones operating system software.
Very irritating, but also simple to fix.....
Otherwise arachne was the only graphical browser I could get running on those 2meg GRiD 386 notebooks I've mentioned so much in the past.

<clipped>
>Arachne has always givem me some trouble. Ie had bad experiences with DOS,
>Win and Linux versions. Most probably I don't perfectly understand how to
>get it properly installed or something. Anyway, I have to say Ie tried
>only very old versions (I did it long time ago)...

>Regards,
>Angel

------------------------------------------------------------
Visit the world's greatest site at http://www.farts.com and listen to the fart
of the day. Also, get your very own farts.com E-mail account. FREE!!!!!

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mulinux-unsubscribe@sunsite.dk
For additional commands, e-mail: mulinux-help@sunsite.dk

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sat Feb 08 2003 - 15:27:19 CET