From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Jul 1 04:13:56 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 04:13:56 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i61BDtrU021761; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 04:13:55 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i61BDqdw018105 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 1 Jul 2004 04:13:53 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i61BDVM4018272; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 04:13:31 -0700 Received: from mxu8.u.washington.edu (mxu8.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.142]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i61BCdwr058934 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 04:12:39 -0700 Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.134]) by mxu8.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i61BCcmq030232 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 04:12:38 -0700 Received: from shiva1.cac.washington.edu (shiva1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.37.171]) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i61BCWs8025618; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 04:12:32 -0700 Received: from localhost (mrc@localhost) by shiva1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i61BCVkJ022284; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 04:12:32 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 04:12:31 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Mark Crispin To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Request: Pine build honouring SSLCERTS In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Henrik Edlund X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Sun, 27 Jun 2004, Henrik Edlund wrote: > It would be nice if the Pine build would honour the SSLCERTS parameters on > the build line and use it internally for locating local certificates for > verification. Now it just seems to be used in the build script to check if > the directory exists and some other checks. It took me a while to figure out what you're asking for. This has nothing to do with the "build"; what you want is to have client code use that path. How is this useful? It's one thing to want to store server certificates in a different directory (more importantly, the server private keys). But CA certificates and public keys should be global for all applications. -- Mark -- http://staff.washington.edu/mrc Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate. Si vis pacem, para bellum. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Jul 1 05:29:40 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 05:29:40 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i61CTcBe023611; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 05:29:38 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i61CTaLf009520 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 1 Jul 2004 05:29:37 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i61CTMRw010952; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 05:29:22 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i61CSWZS058922 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 05:28:32 -0700 Received: from ticalc.ticalc.org (ticalc.ticalc.org [62.65.69.4]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i61CSS54009487 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 05:28:29 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ticalc.ticalc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF304E4E7; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 14:28:27 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 14:28:27 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Henrik Edlund To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Request: Pine build honouring SSLCERTS In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Mark Crispin X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Mark, On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, Mark Crispin wrote: > How is this useful? It's one thing to want to store server certificates > in a different directory (more importantly, the server private keys). > But CA certificates and public keys should be global for all > applications. It is useful as we do not want to rebuild OpenSSL but prefer to keep certificates/keys in their own local directory (not part of the system OpenSSL installation). All other OpenSSL-aware applications we use; Apache, WU-IMAP, Postfix, stunnel, etc; allow us to specify where they look for certificates and keys. As you are allowed to set SSLCERTS on the build command line, I thought it really meant something, but that variable was only used in the build script for some simple checks. We build WU-IMAP with SSLCERTS set to our own directory and that works great (it then looks for imapd.pem and ipop3d.pem there). It would be great if Pine would use SSLCERTS (build command line) as its default location for looking up certificates as well. Also one might have different trust for different application usage, and hence want to trust different (number of) CAs for different applications. Sincerely, Henrik From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Jul 1 10:35:14 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 10:35:14 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i61HZDCC002277; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 10:35:13 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i61HZBtP030151 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 1 Jul 2004 10:35:11 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i61HYug4015106; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 10:34:56 -0700 Received: from mxe2.u.washington.edu (mxe2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i61HYEPi015466 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 10:34:14 -0700 Received: from mail.arczip.com (mail.arczip.com [216.126.227.134]) by mxe2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i61HYBTl029699 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 10:34:11 -0700 Received: from 03-120.149.popsite.net [64.24.186.120] by mail.arczip.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.12) id AB101DF40136; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 11:34:08 -0600 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 13:40:28 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: "Dr. Clea F. Rees" Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Dr. Clea F. Rees" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Request: Pine build honouring SSLCERTS In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Henrik Edlund X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='SMTPD_IN_RCVD 0.000, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __C230066_P5 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I am also interested in this for a different reason. I use Mac OS X, which isn't using the latest version of OpenSSL. Since I don't want to mess with the System files, which can cause problems for OS updates from Apple, among other things, I installed the latest version in /usr/local/. I also don't want to add things into the System Library if, for example, I need to add certificates. So, I want to build Pine so it uses the /usr/local/ installation of OpenSSL and looks for certificates in the appropriate directory there. I'm not sure I'm not missing something, because I know very little about OpenSSL and am really whistling in the dark. So, I apologise in advance if I'm way off. Clea -- Dr. Clea F. Rees Department of Philosophy Sutton Hall, Room 452 1011 South Drive Indiana University of Pennsylvania Indiana PA 15705-1087 U.S.A. Tel: +1-724-357-5614 (o) +1-724-357-2310 (d) NB: From UK, dial 00 before the appropriate number to access the international system. email: rees@arczip.com http://users.arczip.com/rees/ On 01/07/04, you seem to have written: > Mark, > > On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, Mark Crispin wrote: > >> How is this useful? It's one thing to want to store server certificates >> in a different directory (more importantly, the server private keys). But >> CA certificates and public keys should be global for all applications. > > It is useful as we do not want to rebuild OpenSSL but prefer to keep > certificates/keys in their own local directory (not part of the system > OpenSSL installation). All other OpenSSL-aware applications we use; Apache, > WU-IMAP, Postfix, stunnel, etc; allow us to specify where they look for > certificates and keys. > > As you are allowed to set SSLCERTS on the build command line, I thought it > really meant something, but that variable was only used in the build script > for some simple checks. We build WU-IMAP with SSLCERTS set to our own > directory and that works great (it then looks for imapd.pem and ipop3d.pem > there). It would be great if Pine would use SSLCERTS (build command line) as > its default location for looking up certificates as well. > > Also one might have different trust for different application usage, and > hence want to trust different (number of) CAs for different applications. > > Sincerely, > Henrik > > > From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Jul 1 11:04:16 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 11:04:16 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i61I4Ffl004015; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 11:04:15 -0700 Received: from L1483P15.dipool.highway.telekom.at (L1483P15.dipool.highway.telekom.at [62.46.249.79]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i61HuYBU020383; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 11:03:43 -0700 Received: from 0.35.124.114 by 140.142.33.1; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 23:57:44 +0500 Message-ID: From: "Jed Abernathy" Reply-To: "Jed Abernathy" To: pine-admin@cac.washington.edu Cc: noc@cac.washington.edu, pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu, keno@cac.washington.edu, pine-faq@cac.washington.edu, kanelson@cac.washington.edu, pine-announce@cac.washington.edu, webguides@cac.washington.edu, imap@cac.washington.edu, faxhelp@cac.washington.edu, walker@cac.washington.edu, mwinkle@cac.washington.edu, owner-outages@cac.washington.edu Subject: Status: Approved Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 17:55:44 -0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--16774662726940082" X-Priority: 3 X-CS-IP: 92.100.64.88 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXII, Probability=92%, Report='MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, DCC_BULK_HIGH 3.5, BIZ_TLD 1.251, PRIORITY_NO_NAME 0.716, URI_HEAVY 0.206, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __DCC_BODY_10 0, __DCC_FUZ1_MANY 0, __DCC_FUZ2_100 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0' ----16774662726940082 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit We have reviewed your information today.
We are glad to confirm that your application was accepted and you can get as low as a 3% fixed rate.

Please visit our Quick Form to enter final details we need to complete the process.

We look forward to doing business with you.

Best Regards,
Jed Abernathy
Account Manager
-----------------------------------------

As you are allowed to set SSLCERTS on the build command line, I thought it > really meant something, but that variable was only used in the build script > for some simple checks. That is incorrect. The SSLCERTS setting from the Pine build is passed down to the IMAP toolkit build, where it sets the server certificates location for impad and ipop3d. That's what that line that writes an imap/SPECIALS file is all about. Put another way, the SSLCERTS build parameter is to set the certificate path for the imapd and ipop3d servers that are built as part of the Pine build. > It would be great if Pine would use SSLCERTS (build command line) as > its default location for looking up certificates as well. There are excellent reasons NOT to do this. The entire purpose for setting SSLCERTS to a different location is to place server certificates (and especially the private keys) in a separate read-protected directory from the publicly-readable directory used by clients. The only acceptable way to have a build-line parameter that would alter Pine's *client* certificate directory would be if it was a new parameter name that set the client certificate directory separately from the server certificate directory. This would be a fair amount of work. I question its utility compared to just building OpenSSL with its default certificate directory set to the desired directory for client certificates. > Also one might have different trust for different application usage, and > hence want to trust different (number of) CAs for different applications. I can't imagine how this would be useful, especially for Pine which can potentially be used to access a server anywhere in the world. CA certificates are global in nature. [*] imapd is a product of the University of Washington (UW) in Seattle, WA, USA. To my knowledge, Washington University (WU) in St. Louis, MO, USA does not produce an IMAP server, although they do produce an highly-regarded FTP server. Geographically, the two universities are thousands of kilometers apart. -- Mark -- http://staff.washington.edu/mrc Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate. Si vis pacem, para bellum. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Jul 1 13:56:50 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 13:56:50 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i61Kuoh2011778; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 13:56:50 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i61KulX9005102 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 1 Jul 2004 13:56:48 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i61Kuc99013512; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 13:56:38 -0700 Received: from mxe2.u.washington.edu (mxe2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i61Ku6bB097522 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 13:56:07 -0700 Received: from ticalc.ticalc.org (ticalc.ticalc.org [62.65.69.4]) by mxe2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i61Ku31C012869 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 13:56:03 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ticalc.ticalc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8326CE4ED; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 22:56:02 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 22:56:02 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Henrik Edlund To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Request: Pine build honouring SSLCERTS In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Mark Crispin X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, Mark Crispin wrote: > The SSLCERTS setting from the Pine build is passed down to the IMAP > toolkit build, where it sets the server certificates location for impad > and ipop3d. That's what that line that writes an imap/SPECIALS file is > all about. That may be true, but when I build Pine I build Pine. When I build IMAP I download it and build it. So to me it looked like it was (and is) ignored by Pine itself. > The only acceptable way to have a build-line parameter that would alter > Pine's *client* certificate directory would be if it was a new parameter name > that set the client certificate directory separately from the server > certificate directory. > > This would be a fair amount of work. I question its utility compared to > just building OpenSSL with its default certificate directory set to the > desired directory for client certificates. How come? Don't you have all certificate authorization abstraced in one place? > I can't imagine how this would be useful, especially for Pine which can > potentially be used to access a server anywhere in the world. CA > certificates are global in nature. Between different applications, not in Pine. I prefer not to re-symlink the system certs directory everytime a new application is to be run. With variant symlinks this would of course be possible, but variant symlinks are not available on my current Linux distribution. But I can accept you won't do it. I'll dig into the code myself and locate the places where I have to change it to make it work with our system setup. The benefit of having access to the source, no less. Thanks for your time. Henrik From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Jul 1 16:12:32 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:12:32 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i61NCTlN018423; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:12:29 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i61NCRjj032237 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:12:27 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i61NCFjf018104; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:12:16 -0700 Received: from mxi2.u.washington.edu (mxi2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.12]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i61NBinT066540 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:11:44 -0700 Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.134]) by mxi2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i61NBhnv032547 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:11:43 -0700 Received: from shiva1.cac.washington.edu (shiva1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.37.171]) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i61NBg4c030651; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:11:42 -0700 Received: from localhost (mrc@localhost) by shiva1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i61NBgrp019415; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:11:42 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:11:42 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Mark Crispin To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Request: Pine build honouring SSLCERTS In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: "Dr. Clea F. Rees" X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, Dr. Clea F. Rees wrote: > I am also interested in this for a different reason. I use Mac OS X, > which isn't using the latest version of OpenSSL. Since I don't want to > mess with the System files, which can cause problems for OS updates from > Apple, among other things, I installed the latest version in > /usr/local/. I also don't want to add things into the System Library if, > for example, I need to add certificates. So, I want to build Pine so it > uses the /usr/local/ installation of OpenSSL and looks for certificates > in the appropriate directory there. Are you really adding certificates for client programs, such as Pine? Note that this proposed feature, if added, would require that all the Certificate Authority certificates be copied from Mac OS X's OpenSSL to the /usr/local copy. Also note that if you install all of the latest version of OpenSSL into /usr/local, then you can use that version to build Pine. In that case, the client certificates directory would be the directory of your choosing when you built OpenSSL, and Pine will get that version. I realize that this is complicated and hard to understand -- it took me a long while to understand it myself! But I think that as long as you use *only* your /usr/local version of OpenSSL with Pine (as opposed to building Pine with the System version of OpenSSL but expecting Pine to use the /usr/local files) then you will be OK. -- Mark -- http://staff.washington.edu/mrc Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate. Si vis pacem, para bellum. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Jul 1 16:39:23 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:39:23 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from CMDZ-MAINSVR ([202.107.198.134]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i61NdKnf019442 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:39:22 -0700 Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:39:20 -0700 From: xtrsgzwkfpe@netscape.com Received: from 92.240.138.195 by 202.107.198.134; Fri, 02 Jul 2004 03:32:02 +0300 Message-ID: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:48:57 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i61NmvNG019957; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:48:57 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i61NmsUs011707 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:48:55 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i61NmZn9005040; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:48:35 -0700 Received: from mxe2.u.washington.edu (mxe2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i61Nm4rK087016 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:48:04 -0700 Received: from ticalc.ticalc.org (ticalc.ticalc.org [62.65.69.4]) by mxe2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i61Nm0nF018342 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:48:01 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ticalc.ticalc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2549E4EC; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 01:47:59 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 01:47:59 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Henrik Edlund To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Request: Pine build honouring SSLCERTS In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Mark Crispin X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, Mark Crispin wrote: > I realize that this is complicated and hard to understand -- it took me > a long while to understand it myself! But I think that as long as you > use *only* your /usr/local version of OpenSSL with Pine (as opposed to > building Pine with the System version of OpenSSL but expecting Pine to > use the /usr/local files) then you will be OK. Another reason for even having a user configurable (pinerc) option for this is if users want to trust their own CAs or self-signed certificates. The end-user may not have root access or the ability to re-compile OpenSSL (or install OpenSSL in their home directory and then compile their own Pine with that as well). A sysadmin may not want to centrally install each users trusted CAs/certificates. And before you say there are only one set of trusted CAs, I can tell you that for example KDE comes with more trusted CAs (for Konquerer, etc) than OpenSSL (which it does not install by default). So there seems to be little consenses of the common CA set. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jul 2 12:15:10 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 12:15:09 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i62JF8ta025154; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 12:15:08 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i62JF6JN011529 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 2 Jul 2004 12:15:06 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i62JEpK9011486; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 12:14:51 -0700 Received: from mxe2.u.washington.edu (mxe2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i62JE7Wv121012 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 12:14:09 -0700 Received: from mail.home.narnia.pp.se (as1-6-2.has.s.bonet.se [194.236.120.231]) by mxe2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i62JDpDY013560 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 12:13:54 -0700 Received: from kafka.home.narnia.pp.se (kafka.home.narnia.pp.se [172.25.25.56]) by mail.home.narnia.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 726A8B810; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 21:13:46 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <20040702210531.B1773@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 21:13:46 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Mats Dufberg To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Request: Pine build honouring SSLCERTS In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Mark Crispin X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-message-flag: Tired of your mail client? Get pine! http://www.washington.edu/pine/ X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Jul 1, 2004, 13:41 (-0700) Mark Crispin wrote: > Pine is a client, not a server. As such, it needs access to Certificate > Authority (CA) certificates in order to validate certificates. It is > sometimes necessary to be able to access a local public key if it is > self-signed; but self-signing is inferior security practice to using a CA (if > necessary, set up your own CA and install its certificate). Self-signed certificates are inferior if you do not have any independent verification of them. Other mail clients let me accept a self-signed certificate, which means that if I verify the certificate once, it is as safe as a certificate signed by a trusted CA. The pine user might not be able to set any CA up, because the mailserver is controlled by someone else (e.g. IT department). My request is that pine lets me accepts any certificate after presenting its fingerprint. Mats ----------------------------------------------------------------- Mats Dufberg mats@dufberg.se Blaoarvsgraend 42 +46-8-38 48 59 SE-162 45 Vaellingby, Sweden +46-70-258 2588 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jul 2 20:30:04 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 20:30:04 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i633U3QK009674; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 20:30:03 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i633U1DE013706 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 2 Jul 2004 20:30:02 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i633Tou6015148; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 20:29:50 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i633Skei104376 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 20:28:46 -0700 Received: from b.mail.sonic.net (b.mail.sonic.net [64.142.19.5]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i633ShR4012564 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 20:28:43 -0700 Received: from icidev (dial-209-148-112-84.sonic.net [209.148.112.84]) by b.mail.sonic.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id i633Sgc9023858 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 20:28:42 -0700 Message-Id: <009a01c460ad$e55e7cc0$04cbfea9@icidev> Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 20:28:59 -0700 Reply-To: "Suresh Govindachar" Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Suresh Govindachar" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: enable-vi-navigation? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4925.2800 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=X, Probability=10%, Report='PRIORITY_NO_NAME 0.716, __OUTLOOK_MSGID_1 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MIMEOLE 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, __HAS_MSGID 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello, Does pine have anything like "enable-vi-navigation" so that hjkl-keys work like arrow keys, Ctrl-F and Ctrl-B work like page-up/down, / works for WhereIs etc.? I have not been able to find any such think. If pine does support such a feature, how does one turn it on? Thanks, --Suresh -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Jul 5 04:04:11 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 04:04:11 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i65B460D007303; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 04:04:06 -0700 Received: from sudanmail.net ([212.0.148.23]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i65B3svn023738; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 04:03:57 -0700 Received: from [212.199.251.178] (account dominik3@sudanmail.net) by sudanmail.net (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.1.8) with HTTP id 18402514; Mon, 05 Jul 2004 14:10:44 +0300 From: "dominik3" Subject: urgent business proposal. To: dominik3@sudanmail.net X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.1.8 Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2004 14:10:44 +0300 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1256"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXIII, Probability=63%, Report='NIGERIAN_SUBJECT2 2.900, URGENT_BIZ 1.799, NA_DOLLARS 0.765, LINES_OF_YELLING_3 0.671, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, LINES_OF_YELLING_2 0.001, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, DEAR_SOMETHING 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_46 0, __CHILD_PORN_NOT_1 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __DCC_BODY_10 0, __DCC_FUZ1_10 0, __DCC_FUZ2_10 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' DR.DOMINIK KABILA FIRST SON OF ESEMA XXII ELEME KINGDOM NIGER DELTA COMMUNITY PHONE:234+80 36 66 47 73 PRIVATE EMAIL:dominik3@gawab.com HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL Dear Sir/Madam, Good Day And Compliment of season. I am Dr.Dominik Kabila {a Civil servant in the ministry of Health} here in Nigeria. I know this letter would come to you as a surprise because we have not met before either physically or through correspondence. I got your contact from our chamber of commerce here in Nigeria and have no doubt in your ability to handle this proposal involving huge sums of money. The Subject: My father Chief Micheal Kabila {Now late} was the Royal head of my community, Eleme {an Oil rich town} in Nigeria. My community produce 5.8% of the total annual Oil production in Nigeria and 0.5% of the Dollar value of each barrel is paid to my father as royalty by the federal government. In his position as the royal head and chairman of the Eleme Oil trust fund, he made some money which he kept behind for his children. The money is one hundred and twenty eight Million, Five Hundred thousand US Dollars {$128.5m}. This money originated from the accumulated royalties between 1998. Due to poor banking system in Nigeria and political/economic instability as a result of past military rules {1985-1999}, he deposited this money in a "Box" with an open beneficiary in a security Vault.In the name of a foreign firm. He told the security Company that the content of the box is Gold worth [$128.5m] And the box will be safeguarded until he finishes arrangement to transfer it abroad. He was planning this when he died last year of heart Attack. The Proposal: Just before my father died, he called my attention in confidence to the money and charged me to look for a foreigner who would assist me in the transfer/investment of the fund. So I would be very grateful if you could accept to help me achieve this great objective. I promise to give you 25% of total fund transferred as compensation for your assistant. Five percent {5%} will be set aside to take care of all expenses we may incur during the transaction. To indicate your interest, contact me urgently and confidentially for more information and the roles you will play in the transaction. I will like if you to add your phone/fax number on your reply for easy contact. Always reply your mail via my private email box dominik3@gawab.com. God bless you. Dominik Kabila, For the family. DR.DOMINIK KABILA FIRST SON OF ESEMA XXII ELEME KINGDOM NIGER DELTA COMMUNITY From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Jul 5 05:24:08 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 05:24:08 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i65CO7E9010080; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 05:24:07 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i65CO4Za025623 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 5 Jul 2004 05:24:05 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i65CNWHo013236; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 05:23:32 -0700 Received: from mxe2.u.washington.edu (mxe2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i65CMAaW008414 for ; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 05:22:10 -0700 Received: from concept.ocis.temple.edu (concept.ocis.temple.edu [155.247.27.102]) by mxe2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i65CM6aD004048 for ; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 05:22:07 -0700 Received: from concept.ocis.temple.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by concept.ocis.temple.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i65CM6AC018893 for ; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 08:22:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (sbirl@localhost) by concept.ocis.temple.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10/Submit) with ESMTP id i65CM6ap018890 for ; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 08:22:06 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 08:22:06 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: Pine Discussion Forum Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "S.A. Birl" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: enable-vi-navigation? In-Reply-To: <009a01c460ad$e55e7cc0$04cbfea9@icidev> References: <009a01c460ad$e55e7cc0$04cbfea9@icidev> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: concept.ocis.temple.edu: sbirl owned process doing -bs X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-CONCEPT-TEMPLE-EDU: sbirl at concept dot temple dot edu composed this message. X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=X, Probability=10%, Report='PRIORITY_NO_NAME 0.716, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, X_AUTH_WARNING 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, __HAS_MSGID 0, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Jul 2, Suresh Govindachar (nospam-sgovindachar@yahoo.com.ns) typed: Suresh: Hello, Suresh: Suresh: Does pine have anything like "enable-vi-navigation" Suresh: so that hjkl-keys work like arrow keys, Ctrl-F and Suresh: Ctrl-B work like page-up/down, / works Suresh: for WhereIs etc.? Suresh: Suresh: I have not been able to find any such think. If pine Suresh: does support such a feature, how does one turn it on? Suresh: Suresh: Thanks, Suresh: Suresh: --Suresh Why not set up vi as alternate editor? From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Jul 5 07:20:33 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 07:20:33 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i65EKXX5012790; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 07:20:33 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i65EKUUe010737 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 5 Jul 2004 07:20:31 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i65EKBRi012548; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 07:20:11 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i65EJK7G043568 for ; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 07:19:20 -0700 Received: from b.mail.sonic.net (b.mail.sonic.net [64.142.19.5]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i65EJHci032738 for ; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 07:19:17 -0700 Received: from icidev (dial-209-148-112-161.sonic.net [209.148.112.161]) by b.mail.sonic.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id i65EJFXK005917; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 07:19:15 -0700 Message-Id: <003101c4629b$12b7b9e0$04cbfea9@icidev> Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 07:19:19 -0700 Reply-To: "Suresh Govindachar" Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Suresh Govindachar" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: enable-vi-navigation? References: <009a01c460ad$e55e7cc0$04cbfea9@icidev> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: "Pine Discussion Forum" X-Cc: X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4925.2800 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=X, Probability=10%, Report='PRIORITY_NO_NAME 0.716, __OUTLOOK_MSGID_1 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MIMEOLE 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, __HAS_MSGID 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN > S.A. Birl Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 5:22 AM > > On Jul 2, Suresh Govindachar (nospam-sgovindachar@yahoo.com.ns) typed: > > Suresh: Does pine have anything like "enable-vi-navigation" > Suresh: so that hjkl-keys work like arrow keys, Ctrl-F and > Suresh: Ctrl-B work like page-up/down, / works > Suresh: for WhereIs etc.? [...] > Why not set up vi as alternate editor? I was looking for vi-emulation not while entering text but while navigating the various "menu/control" windows of pine. I have since learnt (from Eduardo Chappa) that this cannot be done (and also that pine does not support reconfiguration of keystrokes). --Suresh From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jul 6 09:31:40 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 09:31:40 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i66GVeUV024826; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 09:31:40 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i66GVaMt001958 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 6 Jul 2004 09:31:36 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i66GVK1P008338; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 09:31:20 -0700 Received: from mxe4.u.washington.edu (mxe4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i66GUF31104274 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 09:30:15 -0700 Received: from server2.umt.edu (server2.umt.edu [150.131.14.55]) by mxe4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i66GUERZ008452 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 09:30:14 -0700 Received: from ma110.gs.umt.edu ([10.8.9.58]) by server2.umt.edu (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id i66GUE508617 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 10:30:14 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 10:30:14 -0600 (Mountain Daylight Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Nikolaus Vonessen To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: file-name completion: two questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi! I have two questions (maybe feature requests) regarding file-name completion. I should add that I am using PC-Pine 4.60 under Windows 2000. 1) Is there a way to get file-name completion to work for the fcc field when composing a message? This would be very useful. I have been using pine for many years, and that would be my number one feature request, if there isn't already a way to do this. (I know about the ^T command, but that is too slow for my taste. Also, it does not work too well for me in directories with many mail folders.) 2) When I use file-name completion (e.g., when saving a message), pine automatically appends a "/" at the end of the file's name (reslting, say in "myfile/", but does not let me save to "myfile/", giving me the error message "Folder "myfile/" doesn't exist. Create? I have to manually delete the "/" to sucessfully save the message to the file "myfile". Is there a way to tell pine not to append "/" at the end of the file name? Thanks for any pointers! Yours, Nikolaus Vonessen -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jul 6 09:57:12 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 09:57:12 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i66GvBHF026213; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 09:57:11 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i66Gv9hA002961 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 6 Jul 2004 09:57:09 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i66GusQD013082; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 09:56:54 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i66GuKx4074692 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 09:56:20 -0700 Received: from concept.ocis.temple.edu (concept.ocis.temple.edu [155.247.27.102]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i66GuG1g032578 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 09:56:17 -0700 Received: from concept.ocis.temple.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by concept.ocis.temple.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i66GuGAC025120 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 12:56:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (sbirl@localhost) by concept.ocis.temple.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10/Submit) with ESMTP id i66GuFLw025117 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 12:56:16 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 12:56:15 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: Pine Discussion Forum Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "S.A. Birl" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Request: alt-addresses using patten matching MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: concept.ocis.temple.edu: sbirl owned process doing -bs X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-CONCEPT-TEMPLE-EDU: sbirl at concept dot temple dot edu composed this message. X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=X, Probability=10%, Report='PRIORITY_NO_NAME 0.716, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, X_AUTH_WARNING 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, __HAS_MSGID 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN While reading the help on alt-addresses I didnt see anything about patten matching addresses. I have multiple sendmail aliases (either sbirl+DamnSpammers@concept.temple.edu or test@concept.temple.edu) and would like an easier way to have Pine to detect them instead of entering them all in. Thanks Birl --- Please do not CC me responses to my own posts. I'll read the responses on the list. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jul 6 11:11:39 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 11:11:39 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i66IBcGL030088; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 11:11:38 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i66IBYSN005696 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 6 Jul 2004 11:11:35 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i66IBN6E013696; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 11:11:23 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i66IAok3043688 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 11:10:50 -0700 Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i66IAn4R019201 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 11:10:49 -0700 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i66IAmgu022069 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 11:10:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay3.apple.com (relay3.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.12) with ESMTP id for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 11:10:48 -0700 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i66IAViL012413 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 11:10:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 11:10:31 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: file-name completion: two questions In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, Nikolaus Vonessen wrote: > 2) When I use file-name completion (e.g., when saving a message), pine > automatically appends a "/" at the end of the file's name > (reslting, say in "myfile/", but does not let me save to "myfile/", > giving me the error message > > "Folder "myfile/" doesn't exist. Create? > > I have to manually delete the "/" to sucessfully save the message > to the file "myfile". Is there a way to tell pine not to append > "/" at the end of the file name? I have the same problem when trying to save messages to another mailbox on Mac OS X.. Pine 4.56 running on my personal acct (on "SunOS" which I think is Solaris?) doesn't have this problem. My main acct only started doing this a few years ago, AFAIK.. So it may be a server issue, I still think pine should work around the problem. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jul 6 20:55:03 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 20:55:03 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i673t05M021460; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 20:55:00 -0700 Received: from 140.142.33.1 ([220.173.255.46]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i673r72I025833; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 20:54:30 -0700 X-Message-Info: 808V734Pzdtw867WGG765vsqTTUljfI3eXY918bjUKDdOJ16663 Received: from k-074-24-81-2.VOZJOGJ384.hsayqdm@bellsouth.com ([56.142.0.78]) by amdq78-tw641.hsayqdm@bellsouth.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.6999.2030); Wed, 07 Jul 2004 07:29:25 +0200 Message-ID: <478335840899.04630@hsayqdm@bellsouth.com> X-Originating-IP: [144.192.78.246] X-Originating-Email: [hsayqdm@bellsouth.com] X-Sender: hsayqdm@bellsouth.com Reply-To: "Hal " From: "Hal " To: "Kwarner" Subject: Hot Indian Slu.ts Inside fir Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 06:21:25 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--4725999076062889245" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIII, Probability=94%, Report='MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, OBFU_CLASS_OFFENSIVE_LOW 4, INVALID_CHARSET 2, URI_HEAVY 0.206, HTML_50_70 0.092, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __IMGSPAM_BODY_4_6 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __HAS_XOIP 0, __DCC_BODY_10 0, __DCC_FUZ1_10 0, __DCC_FUZ2_10 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, IMGSPAM_BODY_4_6 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0' ----4725999076062889245 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-7218-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit newsreel





haven pemmican broadway oxidant airdrop bessie cetus consultation deadhead turnpike curious intermittent lockian bray revise faber eastland beatitude churchgoer codebreak tote stupor triplex co candlelight doric egret baud disparate societe tomography brennan nectareous delineate niggardly gasify comprehension cliff berth spare cameron pompano brenda linkage ----4725999076062889245-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jul 6 23:25:34 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 23:25:34 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i676PXIq025832; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 23:25:33 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i676PVgw029666 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 6 Jul 2004 23:25:31 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i676PGFq004902; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 23:25:16 -0700 Received: from mxe2.u.washington.edu (mxe2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i676OZAJ046668 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 23:24:35 -0700 Received: from tachyon.quantumlinux.com (tachyon.quantumlinux.com [64.113.1.99]) by mxe2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i676OWcr020585 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 23:24:32 -0700 Received: from [10.0.0.10] (c-67-160-89-202.client.comcast.net [67.160.89.202]) by tachyon.quantumlinux.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i676OBt18974 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 23:24:11 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 23:26:40 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Chuck Wolber To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Line Wrapping MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to . X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Greetings, I just upgraded to 4.60 from 4.44 and am getting used to the many new features. One feature seems to be troubling me. When viewing messages in pine 4.44, they'd all wrap properly at 74 characters. 4.60 seems to wrap arbitrarily, depending on how big the xterm I'm in seemd to be. I've set quell-flowed-text to prevent this from happening on messages *I* create. Now how do I prevent this on messages other people send me? In other words, referencing RFC 2646, how do I *VIEW* messages in Format=Fixed even if they were composed in Format=Flowed (like I could do in the good 'ole days with pine 4.44). -Chuck -- http://www.quantumlinux.com Quantum Linux Laboratories, LLC. ACCELERATING Business with Open Technology "The measure of the restoration lies in the extent to which we apply social values more noble than mere monetary profit." - FDR -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jul 6 23:51:22 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 23:51:22 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i676pGlw026673; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 23:51:16 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i676pEaW030300 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 6 Jul 2004 23:51:14 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i676oveH011924; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 23:50:59 -0700 Received: from mxe4.u.washington.edu (mxe4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i676oJCC105754 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 23:50:20 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (node-402403fa.sfo.onnet.us.uu.net [64.36.3.250]) by mxe4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i676oGeR015245 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 23:50:16 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i676s87u030328; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 23:54:09 -0700 Received: from localhost (ryanb@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id i676s4ss030324; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 23:54:08 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 23:54:04 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Ryan Barrett To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Line Wrapping In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Cc: Chuck Wolber X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: ryanb owned process doing -bs X-X-Sender: ryanb@localhost.localdomain X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, X_AUTH_WARNING 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, Chuck Wolber wrote: > I've set quell-flowed-text to prevent this from happening on messages *I* > create. Now how do I prevent this on messages other people send me? funny you should ask. there's no option to do this in pine 4.60...but, like you, i wasn't satisfied with that. so, i wrote a patch to provide just such an option. it's here: http://snarfed.org/space/pine+flowed-text+patch -Ryan -- "I do not like all these things that I used to, I'd rather walk through the tall grass..." -Brad Wolfe From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jul 7 01:05:04 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 01:05:04 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i67853R0029187; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 01:05:03 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i67850Ri015674 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 7 Jul 2004 01:05:01 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6784lSk013798; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 01:04:47 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6784Cd7008260 for ; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 01:04:12 -0700 Received: from tachyon.quantumlinux.com (tachyon.quantumlinux.com [64.113.1.99]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i678498M020533 for ; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 01:04:09 -0700 Received: from [10.0.0.10] (c-67-160-89-202.client.comcast.net [67.160.89.202]) by tachyon.quantumlinux.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i6783jt13358; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 01:03:45 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 01:06:13 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Chuck Wolber To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Line Wrapping In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Ryan Barrett X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to . X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_SPARSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, Ryan Barrett wrote: > On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, Chuck Wolber wrote: > > > I've set quell-flowed-text to prevent this from happening on messages > > *I* create. Now how do I prevent this on messages other people send > > me? > > funny you should ask. there's no option to do this in pine 4.60...but, > like you, i wasn't satisfied with that. so, i wrote a patch to provide > just such an option. it's here: > > http://snarfed.org/space/pine+flowed-text+patch Outstanding, thank you very much. Only one problem though, whenever I click on the link to get the patch, I get a message that says: "Redirection limit for this URL exceeded. Unable to load requested page. This may be caused by cookies that are blocked." I checked, and I'm not blocking any cookies. Any chance you could send me the patch directly? -Chuck -- http://www.quantumlinux.com Quantum Linux Laboratories, LLC. ACCELERATING Business with Open Technology "The measure of the restoration lies in the extent to which we apply social values more noble than mere monetary profit." - FDR From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jul 7 01:26:42 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 01:26:42 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i678QfbM030374; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 01:26:41 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i678QdbI016296 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 7 Jul 2004 01:26:39 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i678QTfO012084; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 01:26:29 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i678OYlw064472 for ; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 01:24:34 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (node-402403fa.sfo.onnet.us.uu.net [64.36.3.250]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i678OVDe023497 for ; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 01:24:31 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i678Yi7u032383 for ; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 01:34:47 -0700 Received: from localhost (ryanb@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id i678YfpV032379 for ; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 01:34:44 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 01:34:40 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Ryan Barrett To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Line Wrapping In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="8323328-1060445011-1089189280=:32348" X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: ryanb owned process doing -bs X-X-Sender: ryanb@localhost.localdomain X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, X_AUTH_WARNING 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323328-1060445011-1089189280=:32348 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, Chuck Wolber wrote: > Outstanding, thank you very much. Only one problem though, whenever I > click on the link to get the patch, I get a message that says: > > "Redirection limit for this URL exceeded. Unable to load requested page. > This may be caused by cookies that are blocked." sorry...i occasionally play at being a sysadmin, which causes problems, since i'm not a very good one. :P anyway, the site should be working now, and i've also attached the patch. -Ryan -- "I do not like all these things that I used to, I'd rather walk through the tall grass..." -Brad Wolfe --8323328-1060445011-1089189280=:32348 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; name="quell-displaying-flowed-text.patch.4.60" Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 Content-ID: Content-Description: Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="quell-displaying-flowed-text.patch.4.60" ZGlmZiAtcmMgcGluZTQuNjAvcGluZS9pbml0LmMgcGluZTQuNjAuZGlzcGxh eS1mbG93ZWQtdGV4dC9waW5lL2luaXQuYw0KKioqIHBpbmU0LjYwL3BpbmUv aW5pdC5jCTIwMDQtMDUtMDcgMTU6MTc6NDMuMDAwMDAwMDAwIC0wNzAwDQot LS0gcGluZTQuNjAuZGlzcGxheS1mbG93ZWQtdGV4dC9waW5lL2luaXQuYwky MDA0LTA2LTA0IDIxOjM2OjU1LjAwMDAwMDAwMCAtMDcwMA0KKioqKioqKioq KioqKioqDQoqKiogMjY2MiwyNjY3ICoqKioNCi0tLSAyNjYyLDI2NzAgLS0t LQ0KICAjZW5kaWYNCiAgCXsicXVlbGwtY2hhcnNldC13YXJuaW5nIiwNCiAg CSBGX1FVRUxMX0NIQVJTRVRfV0FSTklORywgaF9jb25maWdfcXVlbGxfY2hh cnNldF93YXJuaW5nLCBQUkVGX1ZJRVd9LA0KKyAJeyJxdWVsbC1kaXNwbGF5 aW5nLWZsb3dlZC10ZXh0IiwNCisgCSBGX1FVRUxMX0RJU1BMQVlJTkdfRkxP V0VEX1RFWFQsIGhfY29uZmlnX3F1ZWxsX2Rpc3BsYXlpbmdfZmxvd2VkX3Rl eHQsDQorIAkgUFJFRl9WSUVXfSwNCiAgDQogIC8qIE5ld3MgKi8NCiAgCXsi Y29tcG9zZS1zZXRzLW5ld3Nncm91cC13aXRob3V0LWNvbmZpcm0iLA0KZGlm ZiAtcmMgcGluZTQuNjAvcGluZS9tYWlsdmlldy5jIHBpbmU0LjYwLmRpc3Bs YXktZmxvd2VkLXRleHQvcGluZS9tYWlsdmlldy5jDQoqKiogcGluZTQuNjAv cGluZS9tYWlsdmlldy5jCTIwMDQtMDUtMDYgMTA6NDc6MjUuMDAwMDAwMDAw IC0wNzAwDQotLS0gcGluZTQuNjAuZGlzcGxheS1mbG93ZWQtdGV4dC9waW5l L21haWx2aWV3LmMJMjAwNC0wNi0wNCAwOTozNDozNS4wMDAwMDAwMDAgLTA3 MDANCioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKg0KKioqIDUxNzgsNTE4NCAqKioqDQogICAg ICAgICAmJiAhc3RydWNtcChhdHQtPmJvZHktPnN1YnR5cGUsICJwbGFpbiIp DQogICAgICAgICAmJiAocGFybXZhbCA9IHJmYzIyMzFfZ2V0X3BhcmFtKGF0 dC0+Ym9keS0+cGFyYW1ldGVyLA0KICAJCQkJICAgICAgICJmb3JtYXQiLCBO VUxMLCBOVUxMKSkpew0KISAJaWYoIXN0cnVjbXAocGFybXZhbCwgImZsb3dl ZCIpKQ0KICAJICBpc19mbG93ZWRfbXNnID0gMTsNCiAgCWZzX2dpdmUoKHZv aWQgKiopICZwYXJtdmFsKTsNCiAgICAgIH0NCi0tLSA1MTc4LDUxODUgLS0t LQ0KICAgICAgICAgJiYgIXN0cnVjbXAoYXR0LT5ib2R5LT5zdWJ0eXBlLCAi cGxhaW4iKQ0KICAgICAgICAgJiYgKHBhcm12YWwgPSByZmMyMjMxX2dldF9w YXJhbShhdHQtPmJvZHktPnBhcmFtZXRlciwNCiAgCQkJCSAgICAgICAiZm9y bWF0IiwgTlVMTCwgTlVMTCkpKXsNCiEgCWlmKCFzdHJ1Y21wKHBhcm12YWws ICJmbG93ZWQiKSAmJg0KISAJICAgRl9PRkYoRl9RVUVMTF9ESVNQTEFZSU5H X0ZMT1dFRF9URVhULCBwc19nbG9iYWwpKQ0KICAJICBpc19mbG93ZWRfbXNn ID0gMTsNCiAgCWZzX2dpdmUoKHZvaWQgKiopICZwYXJtdmFsKTsNCiAgICAg IH0NCmRpZmYgLXJjIHBpbmU0LjYwL3BpbmUvcGluZS5oIHBpbmU0LjYwLmRp c3BsYXktZmxvd2VkLXRleHQvcGluZS9waW5lLmgNCioqKiBwaW5lNC42MC9w aW5lL3BpbmUuaAkyMDA0LTA1LTA3IDE1OjE3OjQ4LjAwMDAwMDAwMCAtMDcw MA0KLS0tIHBpbmU0LjYwLmRpc3BsYXktZmxvd2VkLXRleHQvcGluZS9waW5l LmgJMjAwNC0wNi0wNCAyMjowMjo1NC4wMDAwMDAwMDAgLTA3MDANCioqKioq KioqKioqKioqKg0KKioqIDEyNjQsMTI2OSAqKioqDQotLS0gMTI2NCwxMjcw IC0tLS0NCiAgCUZfU1RSSVBfV1NfQkVGT1JFX1NFTkQsDQogIAlGX1FVRUxM X0ZMT1dFRF9URVhULA0KICAJRl9DT01QT1NFX0FMV0FZU19ET1dOR1JBREUs DQorIAlGX1FVRUxMX0RJU1BMQVlJTkdfRkxPV0VEX1RFWFQsDQogICNpZmRl ZglfV0lORE9XUw0KICAJRl9FTkFCTEVfVFJBWUlDT04sDQogIAlGX1FVRUxM X1NTTF9MQVJHRUJMT0NLUywNCmRpZmYgLXJjIHBpbmU0LjYwL3BpbmUvcGlu ZS5obHAgcGluZTQuNjAuZGlzcGxheS1mbG93ZWQtdGV4dC9waW5lL3BpbmUu aGxwDQoqKiogcGluZTQuNjAvcGluZS9waW5lLmhscAkyMDA0LTA1LTA3IDE1 OjE3OjU0LjAwMDAwMDAwMCAtMDcwMA0KLS0tIHBpbmU0LjYwLmRpc3BsYXkt Zmxvd2VkLXRleHQvcGluZS9waW5lLmhscAkyMDA0LTA2LTA0IDIxOjU3OjU0 LjAwMDAwMDAwMCAtMDcwMA0KKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqDQoqKiogMzA0OSwz MDU0ICoqKioNCi0tLSAzMDQ5LDMwNTUgLS0tLQ0KICA8bGk+PGEgaHJlZj0i aF9jb25maWdfcXVlbGxfY2hhcnNldF93YXJuaW5nIj5GRUFUVVJFOiBRdWVs bC1DaGFyc2V0LVdhcm5pbmc8L2E+DQogIDxsaT48YSBocmVmPSJoX2NvbmZp Z19xdWVsbF9jb250ZW50X2lkIj5GRUFUVVJFOiBRdWVsbC1Db250ZW50LUlE PC9hPg0KICA8bGk+PGEgaHJlZj0iaF9jb25maWdfcXVlbGxfZGVhZF9sZXR0 ZXIiPkZFQVRVUkU6IFF1ZWxsLURlYWQtTGV0dGVyLU9uLUNhbmNlbDwvYT4N CisgPGxpPjxhIGhyZWY9ImhfY29uZmlnX3F1ZWxsX2Rpc3BsYXlpbmdfZmxv d2VkX3RleHQiPkZFQVRVUkU6IFF1ZWxsLURpc3BsYXlpbmctRmxvd2VkLVRl eHQ8L2E+DQogIDxsaT48YSBocmVmPSJoX2NvbmZpZ19xdWVsbF9lbXB0eV9k aXJzIj5GRUFUVVJFOiBRdWVsbC1FbXB0eS1EaXJlY3RvcmllczwvYT4NCiAg PGxpPjxhIGhyZWY9ImhfY29uZmlnX3F1ZWxsX3Bvc3RfcHJvbXB0Ij5GRUFU VVJFOiBRdWVsbC1FeHRyYS1Qb3N0LVByb21wdDwvYT4NCiAgPGxpPjxhIGhy ZWY9ImhfY29uZmlnX3F1ZWxsX2ZpbHRlcmluZ19kb25lX21lc3NhZ2UiPkZF QVRVUkU6IFF1ZWxsLUZpbHRlcmluZy1Eb25lLU1lc3NhZ2U8L2E+DQoqKioq KioqKioqKioqKioNCioqKiAyNDc2OCwyNDc3MyAqKioqDQotLS0gMjQ3Njks MjQ3OTQgLS0tLQ0KICAmbHQ7RW5kIG9mIGhlbHAgb24gdGhpcyB0b3BpYyZn dDsNCiAgPC9CT0RZPg0KICA8L0hUTUw+DQorID09PT09PSBoX2NvbmZpZ19x dWVsbF9kaXNwbGF5aW5nX2Zsb3dlZF90ZXh0ID09PT09DQorIDxIVE1MPg0K KyA8SEVBRD4NCisgPFRJVExFPkZFQVRVUkU6IFF1ZWxsLURpc3BsYXlpbmct Rmxvd2VkLVRleHQ8L1RJVExFPg0KKyA8L0hFQUQ+DQorIDxCT0RZPg0KKyA8 SDE+RkVBVFVSRTogUXVlbGwtRGlzcGxheWluZy1GbG93ZWQtVGV4dDwvSDE+ DQorIA0KKyBCZWdpbm5pbmcgd2l0aCB2ZXJzaW9uIDQuNjAsIFBpbmUgZGlz cGxheXMgZmxvd2VkIHRleHQgd2hlcmUgcG9zc2libGUuIFRoZQ0KKyBtZXRo b2QgZm9yIHZpZXdpbmcgZmxvd2VkIHRleHQgaXMgZGVmaW5lZCBieQ0KKyA8 QSBIUkVGPSJodHRwOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL3JmYy9yZmMyNjQ2LnR4dCI+ UkZDIDI2NDY8L0E+OyBmb3IgbW9yZQ0KKyBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbiwgc2VlIDxB IEhSRUY9ImhfY29uZmlnX3F1ZWxsX2Zsb3dlZF90ZXh0Ij5RdWVsbC1GbG93 ZWQtVGV4dDwvQT4uDQorIDxQPg0KKyBJZiB0aGlzIG9wdGlvbiBpcyBzZXQs IHRoZW4gUGluZSB3aWxsIG5vdCBkaXNwbGF5IGZsb3dlZCB0ZXh0IHdoZW4g dmlld2luZw0KKyBtZXNzYWdlcy4NCisgDQorIDxQPg0KKyAmbHQ7RW5kIG9m IGhlbHAgb24gdGhpcyB0b3BpYyZndDsNCisgPC9CT0RZPg0KKyA8L0hUTUw+ DQogID09PT09PSBoX2NvbmZpZ19wcmVmZXJfcGxhaW5fdGV4dCA9PT09PQ0K ICA8SFRNTD4NCiAgPEhFQUQ+DQo= --8323328-1060445011-1089189280=:32348-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Jul 8 00:43:54 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 8 Jul 2004 00:43:54 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i687hrKi019852; Thu, 8 Jul 2004 00:43:53 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i687hoEo029177 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 8 Jul 2004 00:43:51 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i687hbKD015520; Thu, 8 Jul 2004 00:43:38 -0700 Received: from mxe5.u.washington.edu (mxe5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.168]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i687gRgJ029518 for ; Thu, 8 Jul 2004 00:42:27 -0700 Received: from tachyon.quantumlinux.com (tachyon.quantumlinux.com [64.113.1.99]) by mxe5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i687gPxn027974 for ; Thu, 8 Jul 2004 00:42:26 -0700 Received: from [10.0.0.10] (c-67-160-89-202.client.comcast.net [67.160.89.202]) by tachyon.quantumlinux.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i687g2t32172; Thu, 8 Jul 2004 00:42:02 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 00:44:30 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Chuck Wolber To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Line Wrapping In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII; FORMAT=flowed Content-ID: X-To: Ryan Barrett X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to . X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_SPARSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, Ryan Barrett wrote: > On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, Chuck Wolber wrote: > > > Outstanding, thank you very much. Only one problem though, whenever I > > click on the link to get the patch, I get a message that says: > > > > "Redirection limit for this URL exceeded. Unable to load requested page. > > This may be caused by cookies that are blocked." > > sorry...i occasionally play at being a sysadmin, which causes problems, > since i'm not a very good one. :P > > anyway, the site should be working now, and i've also attached the > patch. Ryan, thanks for that. Came through just fine. I've taken the liberty of patching the pine 4.60 source with your patch and rolling the patched version into RPM and DEB packages. Binary and source versions are included. I've posted them here: http://www.quantumlinux.com/~chuckw/ -Chuck -- http://www.quantumlinux.com Quantum Linux Laboratories, LLC. ACCELERATING Business with Open Technology "The measure of the restoration lies in the extent to which we apply social values more noble than mere monetary profit." - FDR From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Jul 8 07:15:07 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 8 Jul 2004 07:15:07 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i68EF7AU000824; Thu, 8 Jul 2004 07:15:07 -0700 Received: from 140.142.33.1 ([220.89.105.181]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i68EDQkt028533; Thu, 8 Jul 2004 07:14:58 -0700 Received: from 188.140.152.236 by 220.89.105.181; Thu, 08 Jul 2004 13:12:00 -0200 Message-ID: From: "Eugene Souza" Reply-To: "Eugene Souza" To: hata@cac.washington.edu Cc: gardners@cac.washington.edu, ltdlm@cac.washington.edu, ndcpilot@cac.washington.edu, pine-info-owner@cac.washington.edu, newsltr@cac.washington.edu, nicweb@cac.washington.edu, bobhurt@cac.washington.edu, davep@cac.washington.edu, bmar@cac.washington.edu, owner-pine-info@cac.washington.edu, plibbey@cac.washington.edu, majordomo@cac.washington.edu, pine-admin@cac.washington.edu, noc@cac.washington.edu, pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu Subject: Re: Information about your application Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 18:12:00 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--285378413106469591" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXIII, Probability=83%, Report='MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, DCC_BULK_HIGH 3.5, URI_HEAVY 0.206, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __DCC_BODY_10 0, __DCC_FUZ1_10 0, __DCC_FUZ2_MANY 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0' ----285378413106469591 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit I am taking the liberty of writing you this letter instead of
interrupting you by phone. We are glad to confirm that your
application was accepted and you can get as low as a 4% fixed r[a]te.

Please fill out the final details:
http://www.lender-site.com/e4/ke.php?n5n=55

Eugene Souza
Account Manager
Emort Association

no more - http://www.lender-site.com/r4/

---msgid---
wingback[1 ----285378413106469591-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jul 9 03:49:08 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 03:49:08 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i69An7Bt018340; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 03:49:07 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i69An5cv015213 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 9 Jul 2004 03:49:05 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i69AmfGP013240; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 03:48:41 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i69AlVn7112394 for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 03:47:31 -0700 Received: from mail.nilings.se (mail.nilings.se [193.13.81.93]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i69AlR6f031660 for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 03:47:28 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.nilings.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A44CC0AA2 for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 12:45:24 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 12:45:24 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Mathias Sundman To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Segfault using Rule with To: modfication MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Pine Mailinglist X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_LONG_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I just tried to create a rule so when I reply to the openvpn-users mailing list, my reply should automatically set the To: header to the list-addr. However, when I try to reply to a mail using this rule, pine stops with a segfault. I'm using Pine v4.60 on Slackware Linux 9 system. Here is the rule I've created: LIT:pattern="/NICK=Mail to openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net/ TO=openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net/FLDTYPE=EMAIL"action="/ ROLE=1/CSTM=To: openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net/RTYPE=YES/FTYPE=YES/CTYPE=NO" Please let me know how I can debug this further or if I need to provide more info. Here is the last output from .pine-debug running pine -d 9: 12:20:50.426961 output_message(Replying using role "Mail to openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net") 12:20:50.430998 - build_address - (openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net) 12:20:50.431752 - adrbk_check_and_fix_all - 12:20:50.432504 - adrbk_check_and_fix({mail.nilings.se/novalidate-cert/norsh/user=mathias@nilings.se}inbox.addressbook) - 12:20:50.433219 - adrbk_check_validity(/home/mathias/.ab584500) - 12:20:50.434004 - adrbk_check_local_validity(/home/mathias/.ab584500) - 12:20:50.434770 - rd_check_remvalid({mail.nilings.se/novalidate-cert/norsh/user=mathias@nilings.se}inbox.addressbook) - 12:20:50.435674 - build_address_internal - (openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net) 12:20:50.436387 - init_ab_if_needed - 12:20:50.437091 - save_state - 12:20:50.438342 - expand_address - (openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net) 12:20:50.440687 - init_abook - 12:20:50.441452 addrbook nickname = Addressbook on Server filename = {mail.nilings.se/novalidate-cert/norsh/user=mathias@nilings.se}inbox .addressbook 12:20:50.442170 ostatus was Closed, want NoDisplay 12:20:50.442883 - adrbk_check_and_fix({mail.nilings.se/novalidate-cert/norsh/user=mathias@nilings.se}inbox.addressbook) - 12:20:50.443598 - adrbk_check_validity(/home/mathias/.ab584500) - 12:20:50.444314 - adrbk_check_local_validity(/home/mathias/.ab584500) - 12:20:50.445073 - rd_check_remvalid({mail.nilings.se/novalidate-cert/norsh/user=mathias@nilings.se}inbox.addressbook) - 12:20:50.445838 - adrbk_lookup_by_addr(openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net) (in /home/mathias/.ab584500) - 12:20:50.446654 adrbk_get_entryref(/home/mathias/.ab584500) - elem=0 (Internal) 12:20:50.447782 - adrbk_get_ae - 12:20:50.448506 adrbk_get_entryref(/home/mathias/.ab584500) - elem=0 (Internal) 12:20:50.450987 - restore_state - 12:20:50.451717 - init_disp_form(Addressbook on Server) - 12:20:50.452433 - init_abook - 12:20:50.453343 addrbook nickname = Addressbook on Server filename = {mail.nilings.se/novalidate-cert/norsh/user=mathias@nilings.se}inbox .addressbook 12:20:50.454064 ostatus was NoDisplay, want Closed 12:20:50.454781 - adrbk_partial_close(/home/mathias/.ab584500) - 12:20:50.455494 - init_entryref_cache - 12:20:50.456199 - clear_entryref_cache - 12:20:50.457767 - warp_to_dlc(0) - -- _____________________________________________________________ Mathias Sundman (^) ASCII Ribbon Campaign NILINGS AB X NO HTML/RTF in e-mail Tel: +46-(0)8-666 32 28 / \ NO Word docs in e-mail -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jul 9 05:56:37 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 05:56:37 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i69Cub6A022575; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 05:56:37 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i69CuYIr010965 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 9 Jul 2004 05:56:35 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i69CuNva013108; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 05:56:23 -0700 Received: from mxe2.u.washington.edu (mxe2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i69CtK6J036854 for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 05:55:20 -0700 Received: from kcte.net (kcte.net [199.239.248.2]) by mxe2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i69CtHn8024831 for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 05:55:17 -0700 Received: from grendal.frinabulax.org (68-69-36-139.mgtnwv.adelphia.net [68.69.36.139]) (authenticated bits=0) by kcte.net (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i69Ct3Z2032754 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 9 Jul 2004 08:55:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (grendal.frinabulax.org [127.0.0.1]) by grendal.frinabulax.org (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i69CswmG022681; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 08:54:58 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 08:54:58 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: robert delius royar Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: robert delius royar To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Segfault using Rule with To: modfication In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Mathias Sundman X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.73, clamav-milter version 0.73a on kcte.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on kcte.net X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.5 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,IN_REP_TO,NOSPAM_INC,REFERENCES, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT_PINE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Level: X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0.001, __SANE_MSGID 0, __FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0, __HAS_MSGID 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Fri, 9 Jul 2004 (12:45 +0200 UTC) Mathias Sundman wrote: > I just tried to create a rule so when I reply to the openvpn-users mailing > list, my reply should automatically set the To: header to the list-addr. > However, when I try to reply to a mail using this rule, pine stops with a > segfault. > > I'm using Pine v4.60 on Slackware Linux 9 system. There are some tests in the code which *can* look at uninitialized variables that may cause a crash. Eduardo Chappa's unofficial patched version of 4.60 has the fix for this (http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ ). I believe the the Pine team mentioned on the Pine newsgroup (comp.mail.pine) that the problem would be corrected in the next release. The problem is (I believe) in pine/send.c where there are tests for if(*pf->addr) which should be if(pf->addr && *pf->addr) (to be safe). By the way, Before I discovered the NULL pointer problem in the code itself, I found a workaround for my setup was to use CC: instead of To:, but that may not work for you. -- Dr. Robert Delius Royar Associate Professor of English Morehead State University Morehead, Kentucky 8:27 up 30 days, 10:11, 1 user, load averages: 0.07 0.29 0.28 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jul 9 13:41:03 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 13:41:03 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i69Kf1tV008656; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 13:41:01 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i69KewSq028352 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 9 Jul 2004 13:40:59 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i69Kehd2016906; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 13:40:43 -0700 Received: from mxe2.u.washington.edu (mxe2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i69KcbrC013682 for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 13:38:37 -0700 Received: from mail.umd.edu (netmail7.mail.umd.edu [128.8.30.200]) by mxe2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i69KcYpM020953 for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 13:38:34 -0700 Received: from umd.edu atlee [68.171.210.38] by mail.umd.edu with NetMail SMTP Agent $Revision: 3.22.1.15 $ on Novell NetWare via secured & encrypted transport (TLS); Fri, 09 Jul 2004 16:38:33 -0400 Message-Id: <40EF0311.70405@umd.edu> Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 16:41:53 -0400 Reply-To: atlee@umd.edu Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Dick Atlee To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Filtering for SPAM with dollar-sign ($) in the Subject line MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en-us, en X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__MOZILLA_MSGID 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, X_ACCEPT_LANG 0, SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN We have a server running Pine 4.5.1. In spite of many experiments, I've been unable to help a user who is getting a lot of spam with a Subject line of the form "$12345" (string of digits). Any way to specify a "$" in a filter rule? Thanks. -- Dick Atlee -- OIT Help Desk & Consulting Services -- Univ. of Maryland atlee@umd.edu -- local 301-405-2999 OIT Help Desk -- http://www.helpdesk.umd.edu/contact/ -- 301-405-1500 -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jul 9 13:51:33 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 13:51:33 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i69KpWbV009397; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 13:51:32 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i69KpU0Y028776 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 9 Jul 2004 13:51:30 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i69KpBUX008672; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 13:51:11 -0700 Received: from mxu9.u.washington.edu (mxu9.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.174]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i69KnC6O069134 for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 13:49:12 -0700 Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.134]) by mxu9.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i69KnChB002631 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 13:49:12 -0700 Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9]) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i69KnB2P019345 for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 13:49:11 -0700 Received: from shiva1.cac.washington.edu (shiva1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.37.171]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i69KnBHB015888 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 13:49:11 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 13:49:11 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Steve Hubert To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Filtering for SPAM with dollar-sign ($) in the Subject line In-Reply-To: <40EF0311.70405@umd.edu> References: <40EF0311.70405@umd.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Sender: hubert@shiva1.cac.washington.edu X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Dick Atlee wrote: > We have a server running Pine 4.5.1. In spite of many experiments, I've been > unable to help a user who is getting a lot of spam with a Subject line of the > form "$12345" (string of digits). Any way to specify a "$" in a filter rule? > Thanks. Try using $$ instead of $. All pine variables go through enviroment variable expansion, so $var is used for that. I don't have a pine 4.51 handy to try it there, but it works in current version. Steve Hubert Univ. of Washington: Computing and Communications, Seattle From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jul 9 20:18:33 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 20:18:33 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6A3IXOA023402; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 20:18:33 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6A3IU46013899 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 9 Jul 2004 20:18:31 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6A3IGS9015164; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 20:18:16 -0700 Received: from mxe1.u.washington.edu (mxe1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.136]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6A3HSD4119974 for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 20:17:28 -0700 Received: from mail.umd.edu (netmail7.mail.umd.edu [128.8.30.200]) by mxe1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6A3HRXT002299 for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 20:17:27 -0700 Received: from umd.edu atlee [68.171.210.38] by mail.umd.edu with NetMail SMTP Agent $Revision: 3.22.1.15 $ on Novell NetWare via secured & encrypted transport (TLS); Fri, 09 Jul 2004 23:17:26 -0400 Message-Id: <40EF608C.4060503@umd.edu> Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 23:20:44 -0400 Reply-To: atlee@umd.edu Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Dick Atlee To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Filtering for SPAM with dollar-sign ($) in the Subject line In-Reply-To: References: <40EF0311.70405@umd.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Accept-Language: en-us, en X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__MOZILLA_MSGID 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, X_ACCEPT_LANG 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Thanks to both Steves. I'd tried double dollars because of the environment variable comments in the new-in-4.60 document, but what it appears to do is cause the $-subject mail to completely disappear, never apparently arriving in the inbox or in the filter-target folder. Oddly, though I'd tried \$ earlier and had it fail, one of my colleagues, unaware of the test, suggested I try it, and when I did, it worked. Who knows why these things happen.... Thanks again for the assistance offered! Dick Steve Hubert wrote: > On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Dick Atlee wrote: > >> We have a server running Pine 4.5.1. In spite of many experiments, >> I've been unable to help a user who is getting a lot of spam with a >> Subject line of the form "$12345" (string of digits). Any way to >> specify a "$" in a filter rule? Thanks. > > > Try using $$ instead of $. All pine variables go through enviroment > variable expansion, so $var is used for that. I don't have a pine 4.51 > handy to try it there, but it works in current version. > > Steve Hubert > Univ. of Washington: Computing and Communications, Seattle > -- Dick Atlee -- OIT Help Desk & Consulting Services -- Univ. of Maryland atlee@umd.edu -- local 301-405-2999 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jul 9 20:42:21 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 20:42:21 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6A3gK0f024008; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 20:42:21 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6A3gIRG009604 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 9 Jul 2004 20:42:19 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6A3g3gV015176; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 20:42:03 -0700 Received: from mxi2.u.washington.edu (mxi2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.12]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6A3fY6Z014872 for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 20:41:34 -0700 Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1]) by mxi2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6A3fY6O025708 for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 20:41:34 -0700 Received: from zeno1.math.washington.edu (IDENT:CZSYNAbZYFicafi5f6oRfzTGPftTbUpH@zeno1.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.4]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i6A3fXLb016268; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 20:41:33 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 20:41:33 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Filtering for SPAM with dollar-sign ($) in the Subject line In-Reply-To: <40EF608C.4060503@umd.edu> References: <40EF0311.70405@umd.edu> <40EF608C.4060503@umd.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Dick Atlee X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.6; VAE 6.26.0.5; VDF 6.26.0.20 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** Dick Atlee (atlee@umd.edu) wrote today: :) Thanks to both Steves. I'd tried double dollars because of the :) environment variable comments in the new-in-4.60 document, but what it :) appears to do is cause the $-subject mail to completely disappear, :) never apparently arriving in the inbox or in the filter-target folder. :) :) Oddly, though I'd tried \$ earlier and had it fail, one of my :) colleagues, unaware of the test, suggested I try it, and when I did, it :) worked. Who knows why these things happen.... Thanks again for the :) assistance offered! It will fail the next time that you edit any filter. Try version 4.60, and let us know if it works for you. -- Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sat Jul 10 08:01:49 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 08:01:49 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6AF1msX011849; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 08:01:48 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6AF1kXr026594 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 10 Jul 2004 08:01:46 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6AF1Vpj007434; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 08:01:32 -0700 Received: from mxe5.u.washington.edu (mxe5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.168]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6AClJ2L049436 for ; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 05:47:19 -0700 Received: from mail.umd.edu (netmail8.mail.umd.edu [128.8.30.201]) by mxe5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6AClFR9031310 for ; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 05:47:16 -0700 Received: from umd.edu atlee [68.171.210.38] by mail.umd.edu with NetMail SMTP Agent $Revision: 3.22.1.15 $ on Novell NetWare via secured & encrypted transport (TLS); Sat, 10 Jul 2004 08:47:15 -0400 Message-Id: <40EFE61E.4060503@umd.edu> Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 08:50:38 -0400 Reply-To: atlee@umd.edu Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Dick Atlee To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Filtering for SPAM with dollar-sign ($) in the Subject line In-Reply-To: References: <40EF0311.70405@umd.edu> <40EF608C.4060503@umd.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Accept-Language: en-us, en X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__MOZILLA_MSGID 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, X_ACCEPT_LANG 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Well, I'd created another dummy filter just to experiment with shuffling, since my user said the \$ didn't work for him. I went back and changed the To:-line pattern in that filter and tried another test with a $-sign, and it filtered OK. Why were you expecting it not to work? Dick PS: Unfortunately this pine is on a Unix server serving a lot of people at the University, and the system staff aren't always crazy about upgrading software, especially (and, from experience, rightfully so) newly released versions. So experimenting with 4.60 is not going to be relevant for a while. Eduardo Chappa wrote: > *** Dick Atlee (atlee@umd.edu) wrote today: > > :) Thanks to both Steves. I'd tried double dollars because of the > :) environment variable comments in the new-in-4.60 document, but what it > :) appears to do is cause the $-subject mail to completely disappear, > :) never apparently arriving in the inbox or in the filter-target folder. > :) > :) Oddly, though I'd tried \$ earlier and had it fail, one of my > :) colleagues, unaware of the test, suggested I try it, and when I did, it > :) worked. Who knows why these things happen.... Thanks again for the > :) assistance offered! > > It will fail the next time that you edit any filter. Try version 4.60, and > let us know if it works for you. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sat Jul 10 08:22:14 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 08:22:14 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6AFMEe1012414; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 08:22:14 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6AFMB2W030048 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 10 Jul 2004 08:22:12 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6AFLwut015214; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 08:21:58 -0700 Received: from mxu8.u.washington.edu (mxu8.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.142]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6AFLOdr041662 for ; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 08:21:24 -0700 Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1]) by mxu8.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6AFLNmj005640 for ; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 08:21:23 -0700 Received: from zeno1.math.washington.edu (IDENT:bAhBrgK856F+QWSpNsOc7ZSMOPRytnU4@zeno1.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.4]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i6AFLMLb015878; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 08:21:23 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 08:21:22 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Filtering for SPAM with dollar-sign ($) in the Subject line In-Reply-To: <40EFE61E.4060503@umd.edu> References: <40EF0311.70405@umd.edu> <40EF608C.4060503@umd.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Dick Atlee X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.6; VAE 6.26.0.5; VDF 6.26.0.21 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** Dick Atlee (abcatlee@umd.edu.k) wrote in the pine-info list today: :) Well, I'd created another dummy filter just to experiment with :) shuffling, since my user said the \$ didn't work for him. I went back :) and changed the To:-line pattern in that filter and tried another test :) with a $-sign, and it filtered OK. Why were you expecting it not to :) work? I recall a bug in which a rule with a "$" sign would be omitted from the list if you edited any other filter. The point was that the "\$" would be transformed into "$" and then lost in the rewriting of the rule. -- Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun Jul 11 06:23:00 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 06:23:00 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6BDMtNJ019265; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 06:22:55 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6BDMr7X030681 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 11 Jul 2004 06:22:53 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6BDMSF2005316; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 06:22:28 -0700 Received: from mxe2.u.washington.edu (mxe2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6BDLfZa055502 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 06:21:41 -0700 Received: from nibbel.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (nibbel.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.240.41]) by mxe2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6BDLbO4020785 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 06:21:38 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nibbel.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AEF64B482 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:21:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from octavianus.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (octavianus.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.240.71]) by nibbel.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8BCF4B461 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:21:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ace.ulyssis.org (ace.ulyssis.student.kuleuven.ac.be [193.190.253.36]) by octavianus.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id C25DFAEE34 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:21:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ace.ulyssis.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ace.ulyssis.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i6BDLadG028925 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:21:36 +0200 Received: from localhost (godot@localhost) by ace.ulyssis.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id i6BDLa1A028921 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:21:36 +0200 Message-Id: Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:21:36 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Danny De Cock To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: S/MIME patch for Pine 4.60 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Authentication-Warning: ace.ulyssis.org: godot owned process doing -bs X-Virus-Scanned: by KULeuven Antivirus Cluster X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, X_AUTH_WARNING 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN hi, I have updated the original smime patch for pine which can be found in the current pine source tree under contrib/smime. it works for me using cygwin, but not using linux/debian (so far, I have only tested with incoming smime messages, as I am planning to use something based on the external scripts produced by thorsten glaser for outgoing smime messages). my patch can, together with much more *nix-related information, be found at: http://godot.studentenweb.org/debian/index_bw.cgi#pinesmime the pine-info archive http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/2004.01/msg00055.html mentions the existance of an smime patch finetuned for 4.58 which is claimed to solve some old bugs and add a few new features, but the site which should provide more information seems to be down. is there anyone out there who could provide me with a copy of that patch against version 4.58? many thanks, danny. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mail : Danny:dot:DeCock:at:esat:dot:kuleuven:dot:ac:dot:be WWW : http://godot.studentenweb.org godot:at:advalvas:dot:be -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun Jul 11 06:33:49 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 06:33:49 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6BDXhCU019474; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 06:33:43 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6BDXf73030879 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 11 Jul 2004 06:33:42 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6BDXTrI016322; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 06:33:29 -0700 Received: from mxe5.u.washington.edu (mxe5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.168]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6BDWinw041686 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 06:32:45 -0700 Received: from ticalc.ticalc.org (ticalc.ticalc.org [62.65.69.4]) by mxe5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6BDWfTt014165 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 06:32:41 -0700 Received: from ticalc.ticalc.org (ticalc.ticalc.org [62.65.69.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ticalc.ticalc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FE35E4EC; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:32:40 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:32:39 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Henrik Edlund To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: S/MIME patch for Pine 4.60 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Danny De Cock X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Sun, 11 Jul 2004, Danny De Cock wrote: > hi, > > I have updated the original smime patch for pine which can be found in > the current pine source tree under contrib/smime. it works for me using > cygwin, but not using linux/debian (so far, I have only tested with > incoming smime messages, as I am planning to use something based on the > external scripts produced by thorsten glaser for outgoing smime > messages). > > my patch can, together with much more *nix-related information, be found > at: http://godot.studentenweb.org/debian/index_bw.cgi#pinesmime > > the pine-info archive > http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/2004.01/msg00055.html mentions > the existance of an smime patch finetuned for 4.58 which is claimed to > solve some old bugs and add a few new features, but the site which > should provide more information seems to be down. > > is there anyone out there who could provide me with a copy of that patch > against version 4.58? > > many thanks, danny. Super. But it would probably had been better if you coordinated with Martin Kouril (Kouril period Martin with seznam period cz) who has been working hard on getting his very much improved patch to work with 4.60 and OpenSSL 0.9.7d. His patch has lots of bugfixes, time server support and support for preference settings. His site seems down now actually, it was up not many days ago. I have a local copy of smime-patch-for-pine4.58.20040508.diff I could send over if you want to. I'll send it in a private email as I am unsure if this lists accepts attachments. That patch worked really well with both incoming and outgoing messages for Pine 4.58. What it could have needed was support to select the key depending on From header, now it selects the key based on your master address (i.e. it uses the master address even if you override it with a role to find the key in your home directory). From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun Jul 11 06:46:08 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 06:46:08 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6BDk724019760; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 06:46:07 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6BDk51Q031111 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 11 Jul 2004 06:46:06 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6BDjmQS012698; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 06:45:49 -0700 Received: from mxe1.u.washington.edu (mxe1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.136]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6BDjFLE069176 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 06:45:15 -0700 Received: from ctcnet.org (ctcnet.org [207.159.150.229] (may be forged)) by mxe1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6BDjEI3029748 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 06:45:14 -0700 Received: from [66.31.44.202] (h000c6e5cc6c0.ne.client2.attbi.com [66.31.44.202]) by ctcnet.org (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id i6BDjDY54712 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 09:45:13 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from info@ctcnet.org) Message-Id: <40F14465.5010200@ctcnet.org> Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 09:45:09 -0400 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Stephen Ronan To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: outgoing mail content-type 4.58 TEXT/PLAIN versus 4.6 MULTIPART/MIXED In-Reply-To: <200407111336.i6BDajql016128@list4.u.washington.edu> References: <200407111336.i6BDajql016128@list4.u.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en-us, en X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='MAY_BE_FORGED 0.000, __MOZILLA_MSGID 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, X_ACCEPT_LANG 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I'm using a pine account for approving messages for a majordomo list. Since upgrading to 4.6 many of the approved messages are rejected by majordomo. The problem seems to be that when I forwarded a message to majordomo using 4.58, it would be sent with: Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN But when I forward the same message using Pine 4.6 it gets sent as: Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-848703117-1089550477=:11690" Might there be a configuration setting within 4.6 that I can change to be sure that the messages are sent as TEXT/PLAIN? Thanks, Stephen Ronan -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun Jul 11 08:15:30 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 08:15:30 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6BFFTRT021713; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 08:15:29 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6BFFR0e000499 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 11 Jul 2004 08:15:28 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6BFFB1n010802; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 08:15:11 -0700 Received: from mxi2.u.washington.edu (mxi2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.12]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6BFEFWT063894 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 08:14:15 -0700 Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1]) by mxi2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6BFEEgG023631 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 08:14:14 -0700 Received: from zeno1.math.washington.edu (IDENT:7iOiFFxB93K3PSoxSUHaffQ4vzFu5F8/@zeno1.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.4]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i6BFECLb014408; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 08:14:13 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 08:14:12 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: outgoing mail content-type 4.58 TEXT/PLAIN versus 4.6 MULTIPART/MIXED In-Reply-To: <40F14465.5010200@ctcnet.org> References: <200407111336.i6BDajql016128@list4.u.washington.edu> <40F14465.5010200@ctcnet.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Stephen Ronan X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.6; VAE 6.26.0.5; VDF 6.26.0.21 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** Stephen Ronan (abcinfo@ctcnet.org.k) wrote in the pine-info list today: :) The problem seems to be that when I forwarded a message to majordomo :) using 4.58, it would be sent with: Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; :) charset=X-UNKNOWN But when I forward the same message using Pine 4.6 it :) gets sent as: Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; :) BOUNDARY="0-848703117-1089550477=:11690" Might there be a configuration :) setting within 4.6 that I can change to be sure that the messages are :) sent as TEXT/PLAIN? Stephen, Try enabling [X] downgrade-multipart-to-text -- Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun Jul 11 09:06:02 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 09:06:02 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6BG5s3A022814; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 09:05:54 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6BG5qTN001564 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 11 Jul 2004 09:05:53 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6BG5c9R013224; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 09:05:39 -0700 Received: from mxe5.u.washington.edu (mxe5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.168]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6BG59pj046816 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 09:05:09 -0700 Received: from wasp.net.au (wasp.conceptual.net.au [203.190.192.17]) by mxe5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6BG55iK028685 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 09:05:06 -0700 Received: from linux.mail.busby.net (softdnserr [::ffff:202.137.97.201]) by wasp.net.au with esmtp; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 00:05:02 +0800 Received: from BBRH73 (unknown [192.168.1.31]) by linux.mail.busby.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75EAF2677C; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:36:31 +0800 (WST) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 00:09:35 +0800 (WST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Bret Busby To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Delivery Status Notification In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, FAILURE_NOTICE_1 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Tue, 8 Jun 2004, Steve Hubert wrote: > Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 14:28:59 -0700 (PDT) > From: Steve Hubert > To: Pine Discussion Forum > Subject: Re: Feature requests > > Pine implements Delivery Status Notifications. This is based on > > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3461.txt > > In trying to use this, in version 4.44 running on Red Ht Linux 7.3, going via a Postfix SMTP server, I get the response " This server does not allow Delivery Status Notification", or some such response. However, I appear to get successful sending of return rexeipt requests, when using Mozilla Messenger mail. I have just checked, and my settings for Mozilla messenger, use the same SMTP server as my PINE email application. This is using DSNOpts which displays at the bottom of the screen, when pressing , then D for DSNOpts, then S for Success, then Y for , to send, in PINE. So, Delivery Status Notification appears to not work in PINE version 4.44, or, for me, anyway. -- Bret Busby Armadale West Australia .............. "So once you do know what the question actually is, you'll know what the answer means." - Deep Thought, Chapter 28 of "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: A Trilogy In Four Parts", written by Douglas Adams, published by Pan Books, 1992 .................................................... -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun Jul 11 09:11:45 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 09:11:45 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6BGBi5n022958; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 09:11:44 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6BGBgh7001685 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 11 Jul 2004 09:11:43 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6BGBRNl016642; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 09:11:27 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6BGB8kX046704 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 09:11:08 -0700 Received: from wasp.net.au (wasp.conceptual.net.au [203.190.192.17]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6BGB5j6016094 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 09:11:05 -0700 Received: from linux.mail.busby.net (softdnserr [::ffff:202.137.97.201]) by wasp.net.au with esmtp; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 00:11:02 +0800 Received: from BBRH73 (unknown [192.168.1.31]) by linux.mail.busby.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58E002677C; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:43:31 +0800 (WST) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 00:16:35 +0800 (WST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Bret Busby To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Feature request - use of Home key In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, daniel lance herrick wrote: > Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 10:51:02 -0400 (EDT) > From: daniel lance herrick > To: Pine Discussion Forum > Subject: Re: Feature request > > On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Bret Busby wrote: > > > On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Bret Busby wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hello. > > > > > > I use PINE 4.44, so I do not know whether this feature has been included > > > in later versions. > > > > > > The feature that I request, is the enabling of the use of the > > > key, in the folder list, so that, if a person is at (but not in) a > > > folder somewhere in the list, and, presses the key, the cursor > > > (and the display) is shifted to the first folder in the list, which, in > > > my list, is the INBOX. > > > > > > This feature would be similar to the use of the key in web > > > browser windows, when clicking on the key, takes the person to the start > > > of the web page; similarly, in the PINE folder list, it would take a > > > person to the start of the folder list. > > > > > > The feature would be useful when people have large numbers of folders (I > > > don't know how many hundred folders I have, including archived folders), > > > rather than repeatedly clicking the key, or using then > > > entering "INBOX" (from memory, that would operate as "Go to folder > > > INBOX"). > > > > > > Also, along the same line, perhaps also incorporating the same > > > functionality, in reading, or viewing, received messages, would be > > > useful, especially when reading long messages, like some newsletters, > > > which have lengths of several screens. > > > > > > Whilst it may be said, that implementing this particular functionality, > > > in these two cases, might cause confusion, when using the key > > > during composing a message, takes the cursor to the start of the current > > > line, rather than to the start of the message being composed, I am > > > confident that, for the most part, PINE users would not be too confused, > > > or, if they are, perhaps, an option in the Settings -> Configuration, to > > > enable/disable the functionality that I seek, could minimise that > > > confusion. > > > > > > Thank you in anticipation. > > > > > > > > > > It has since occurred to me, after trying to use the key to go > > to the start of a message that I was composing, and instead going to > > the start of the line, that it might be a good idea, to implement the > > requested use of the key, by using, as used now, the key > > to go to the start of the current line, and, to go to the > > start of the message, or to the start of the folders list. > > Rather than a shift combination, this is an > application for repeated : > > goes to the beginning of the line > goes to beginning of paragraph > goes to beginning of buffer > > (and similarly for ). I don't remember what > editor it was that had this feature; maybe it was > brief. > > dan > > > > That could be useful, both when composing messages, and, when reading > > received messages, and, traversing the folders list,and, would reduce > > confusion. > > > > The action of the keypress combination, also in other > > places like the Settings -> Configuration and Settings -> Rules -> > > Filters, and in editing the filters themselves, to go to the start of > > the material being displayed, could also be useful for traversing the > > material being displayed. > > > > -- > > In checking, the above response to my request, was the only response that I appear to have received to the feature request. Does this mean that the feature exists in later versions of PINE (than version 4.44), or that using a different editor to the default (which from memory is pico), will enable the features in the response, both in composing messges and, in traversing lists of messages within a folder, and, the message folders? -- Bret Busby Armadale West Australia .............. "So once you do know what the question actually is, you'll know what the answer means." - Deep Thought, Chapter 28 of "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: A Trilogy In Four Parts", written by Douglas Adams, published by Pan Books, 1992 .................................................... From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun Jul 11 12:34:27 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 12:34:27 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6BJYQRY027503; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 12:34:26 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6BJYPm1006104 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 11 Jul 2004 12:34:25 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6BJY9T2018032; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 12:34:09 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6BJXZ8I064338 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 12:33:35 -0700 Received: from ticalc.ticalc.org (ticalc.ticalc.org [62.65.69.4]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6BJXVZR024556 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 12:33:32 -0700 Received: from ticalc.ticalc.org (ticalc.ticalc.org [62.65.69.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ticalc.ticalc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0330E4E7 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:33:30 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:33:30 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Henrik Edlund To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Pine dying when other process has expunged mailbox MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I have a mailbox in MBX format. If I have read a message in this mailbox, there is a mailutil process that moves messages to another mailbox and expunges them. The message then shows as D(eleted) in the mail index (it does not disappear). When I now switch folder (for example to INBOX), Pine wants to expunge the deleted message (which no longer exists in the mailbox) and dies with this in the debug-file: ---- FOLDER LISTER ---- About to open folder "INBOX" inbox is: "INBOX" expunge_and_close: "henrik.edlund.org" Want_to read: y (121) about to end_tty_driver Pine Panic: Received abort signal(sig=11) (If I leave the folder answering no to the expunge questions, Pine does not die.) Known bug? Also, shouldn't Pine thanks to the MBX format mailbox notice the message has been expunged? Why does it show as deleted? -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun Jul 11 16:15:09 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:15:09 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6BNF8S4032693; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:15:08 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6BNF6q5011893 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:15:06 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6BNEqIH011894; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:14:52 -0700 Received: from mxe5.u.washington.edu (mxe5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.168]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6BNCVNR103430 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:12:31 -0700 Received: from ticalc.ticalc.org (ticalc.ticalc.org [62.65.69.4]) by mxe5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6BNCDiX013017 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:12:28 -0700 Received: from ticalc.ticalc.org (ticalc.ticalc.org [62.65.69.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ticalc.ticalc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1A5CE4E7 for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 01:12:12 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 01:12:12 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Henrik Edlund To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: _MIMETYPE_ with sending-filters, since when? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Since which version has Pine supported sending-filters with the _MIMETYPE_ variable? _MIMETYPE_ When the command is executed, this token is replaced in the command name with a temporary file name used to accept any new MIME Content-Type information necessitated by the output of the filter. Upon the filter's exit, if the file contains new MIME type information, Pine verifies its format and replaces the outgoing message's MIME type information with that contained in the file. This is basically a cheap way of sending something other than Text/Plain. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun Jul 11 21:03:56 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:03:56 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6C43tMB006739; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:03:55 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6C43rHV016738 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:03:54 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6C43bo5011440; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:03:37 -0700 Received: from mxi2.u.washington.edu (mxi2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.12]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6C42wdT068724 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:02:58 -0700 Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1]) by mxi2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6C42vrL024861 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:02:57 -0700 Received: from zeno1.math.washington.edu (IDENT:wbsX9Oq1UNp2I4Vqrd/XgvYfnr4j04F8@zeno1.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.4]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i6C42uLb015475 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:02:56 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:02:56 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Filtering for SPAM with dollar-sign ($) in the Subject line In-Reply-To: References: <40EF0311.70405@umd.edu> <40EF608C.4060503@umd.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.6; VAE 6.26.0.5; VDF 6.26.0.21 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 I wrote: :) *** Dick Atlee (abcatlee@umd.edu.k) wrote in the pine-info list today: :) :) :) Well, I'd created another dummy filter just to experiment with :) :) shuffling, since my user said the \$ didn't work for him. I went :) :) back and changed the To:-line pattern in that filter and tried :) :) another test with a $-sign, and it filtered OK. Why were you :) :) expecting it not to work? :) :) I recall a bug in which a rule with a "$" sign would be omitted from :) the list if you edited any other filter. The point was that the "\$" :) would be transformed into "$" and then lost in the rewriting of the :) rule. Dick, Here's a trick that should work, regardless of which version of Pine you are using. Define the subkect field as: =?utf-8?Q?=24?= that's equivalent to a peso ($) sign. -- Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun Jul 11 22:30:48 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 22:30:48 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6C5UhHv008821; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 22:30:43 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6C5Ue0t020645 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 11 Jul 2004 22:30:41 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6C5TsxF008354; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 22:29:54 -0700 Received: from mxe4.u.washington.edu (mxe4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6C5T16B072782 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 22:29:01 -0700 Received: from wasp.net.au (wasp.conceptual.net.au [203.190.192.17]) by mxe4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6C5SxEP013207 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 22:29:00 -0700 Received: from linux.mail.busby.net (203-190-195-032.dial.usertools.net [::ffff:203.190.195.32]) by wasp.net.au with esmtp; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 13:28:57 +0800 Received: from BBRH73 (unknown [192.168.1.31]) by linux.mail.busby.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D2B2677C; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 13:01:21 +0800 (WST) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 13:34:23 +0800 (WST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Bret Busby To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Filtering for SPAM with dollar-sign ($) in the Subject line In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Sun, 11 Jul 2004, Eduardo Chappa wrote: > Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:02:56 -0700 (PDT) > From: Eduardo Chappa > To: Pine Discussion Forum > Subject: Re: Filtering for SPAM with dollar-sign ($) in the Subject line > > *** On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 I wrote: > > :) *** Dick Atlee (abcatlee@umd.edu.k) wrote in the pine-info list today: > :) > :) :) Well, I'd created another dummy filter just to experiment with > :) :) shuffling, since my user said the \$ didn't work for him. I went > :) :) back and changed the To:-line pattern in that filter and tried > :) :) another test with a $-sign, and it filtered OK. Why were you > :) :) expecting it not to work? > :) > :) I recall a bug in which a rule with a "$" sign would be omitted from > :) the list if you edited any other filter. The point was that the "\$" > :) would be transformed into "$" and then lost in the rewriting of the > :) rule. > > Dick, > > Here's a trick that should work, regardless of which version of Pine you > are using. Define the subkect field as: > > =?utf-8?Q?=24?= > > that's equivalent to a peso ($) sign. > > If that would work with a "$" symbol, could you please also give the required equivalents, for the "!", "?", "|", and "." symbols? These are also prevalent in subject lines of spam messages, and the "." and "|" symbols are used to fragment alphabetic character strings, such as words, to defeat spam filters. Thank you in anticipation. -- Bret Busby Armadale West Australia .............. "So once you do know what the question actually is, you'll know what the answer means." - Deep Thought, Chapter 28 of "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: A Trilogy In Four Parts", written by Douglas Adams, published by Pan Books, 1992 .................................................... From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun Jul 11 23:08:58 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:08:58 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6C68qh2010102; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:08:52 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6C68oRi019524 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:08:51 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6C68b90011890; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:08:37 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6C6880O024162 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:08:08 -0700 Received: from wasp.net.au (wasp.conceptual.net.au [203.190.192.17]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6C6840r030233 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:08:05 -0700 Received: from linux.mail.busby.net (203-190-195-032.dial.usertools.net [::ffff:203.190.195.32]) by wasp.net.au with esmtp; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 14:08:02 +0800 Received: from BBRH73 (unknown [192.168.1.31]) by linux.mail.busby.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0217C2677C; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 13:40:25 +0800 (WST) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 14:13:27 +0800 (WST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Bret Busby To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Filtering for SPAM with dollar-sign ($) in the Subject line In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Bret Busby wrote: > Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 13:34:23 +0800 (WST) > From: Bret Busby > To: Pine Discussion Forum > Subject: Re: Filtering for SPAM with dollar-sign ($) in the Subject line > > On Sun, 11 Jul 2004, Eduardo Chappa wrote: > > > Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:02:56 -0700 (PDT) > > From: Eduardo Chappa > > To: Pine Discussion Forum > > Subject: Re: Filtering for SPAM with dollar-sign ($) in the Subject line > > > > *** On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 I wrote: > > > > :) *** Dick Atlee (abcatlee@umd.edu.k) wrote in the pine-info list today: > > :) > > :) :) Well, I'd created another dummy filter just to experiment with > > :) :) shuffling, since my user said the \$ didn't work for him. I went > > :) :) back and changed the To:-line pattern in that filter and tried > > :) :) another test with a $-sign, and it filtered OK. Why were you > > :) :) expecting it not to work? > > :) > > :) I recall a bug in which a rule with a "$" sign would be omitted from > > :) the list if you edited any other filter. The point was that the "\$" > > :) would be transformed into "$" and then lost in the rewriting of the > > :) rule. > > > > Dick, > > > > Here's a trick that should work, regardless of which version of Pine you > > are using. Define the subkect field as: > > > > =?utf-8?Q?=24?= > > > > that's equivalent to a peso ($) sign. > > > > > > If that would work with a "$" symbol, could you please also give the > required equivalents, for the "!", "?", "|", and "." symbols? These > are also prevalent in subject lines of spam messages, and the "." > and "|" symbols are used to fragment alphabetic character strings, such > as words, to defeat spam filters. > > Thank you in anticipation. > > Similarly, with the underscore "_", and tilde "~". Thank you in anticipation. -- Bret Busby Armadale West Australia .............. "So once you do know what the question actually is, you'll know what the answer means." - Deep Thought, Chapter 28 of "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: A Trilogy In Four Parts", written by Douglas Adams, published by Pan Books, 1992 .................................................... From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Jul 12 08:35:29 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 08:35:29 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6CFZS0V026788; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 08:35:28 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6CFZQ2h004508 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 12 Jul 2004 08:35:26 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6CFZ8dU011300; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 08:35:08 -0700 Received: from mxu8.u.washington.edu (mxu8.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.142]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6CFYBtw055386 for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 08:34:11 -0700 Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1]) by mxu8.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6CFYBsP008371 for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 08:34:11 -0700 Received: from zeno1.math.washington.edu (IDENT:JgWnygbrZo/lXWaJ23WPXT6o5qxV7HmV@zeno1.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.4]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i6CFY5Lb024475; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 08:34:06 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 08:34:05 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Filtering for SPAM with dollar-sign ($) in the Subject line In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Bret Busby X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.6; VAE 6.26.0.5; VDF 6.26.0.21 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** Bret Busby (abcbret@busby.net.k) wrote in the pine-info list today: :) > Here's a trick that should work, regardless of which version of Pine :) > you are using. Define the subkect field as: :) > :) > =?utf-8?Q?=24?= :) > :) > that's equivalent to a peso ($) sign. :) :) If that would work with a "$" symbol, could you please also give the :) required equivalents, for the "!", "?", "|", and "." symbols? These are :) also prevalent in subject lines of spam messages, and the "." and "|" :) symbols are used to fragment alphabetic character strings, such as :) words, to defeat spam filters. I don't think you need those codes, you can enter them directly, however, if you really think this is the way to do it, replace the "=24" above (which is the code of the $ sign) by the ascii code of the character that you want. For example, at www.asciitable.com, you will see that a "$" sign has associated the number "24" under the Hx column, "!" is 21, "|" is 7C, and so on. -- Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Jul 12 09:52:04 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 09:52:04 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6CGq4B8030169 for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 09:52:04 -0700 Received: from DaruPC (ppp-0-2.glas-b-1.access.uk.tiscali.com [80.225.154.2]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i6CGq1JE003843 for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 09:52:02 -0700 Message-Id: <200407121652.i6CGq1JE003843@mx1.cac.washington.edu> From: "NitaiGouranga" To: Subject: Gouranga Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:52:00 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIII, Probability=96%, Report='RELAY_IN_CBL 8, DCC_BULK_HIGH 3.5, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __UNUSABLE_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __AOL_FROM 0, __DCC_BODY_MANY 0, __DCC_FUZ1_MANY 0, __DCC_FUZ2_MANY 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0' Call out Gouranga be happy!!! Gouranga Gouranga Gouranga .... That which brings the highest happiness!! From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Jul 12 10:59:10 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 10:59:10 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6CHx6bA001868; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 10:59:06 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6CHx33s006558 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 12 Jul 2004 10:59:04 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6CHwhLe010878; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 10:58:44 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6CHvoYb103632 for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 10:57:50 -0700 Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6CHvl5h008086 for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 10:57:48 -0700 Received: from mailgate2.apple.com (a17-128-100-204.apple.com [17.128.100.204]) by mail-out3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6CHvx0h024750 for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 10:57:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay1.apple.com (relay1.apple.com) by mailgate2.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.6) with ESMTP id for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 10:57:47 -0700 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay1.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6CHviNb011367 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 10:57:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 10:57:44 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Filtering for SPAM with dollar-sign ($) in the Subject line In-Reply-To: <40EFE61E.4060503@umd.edu> References: <40EF0311.70405@umd.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Sat, 10 Jul 2004, Dick Atlee wrote: > PS: Unfortunately this pine is on a Unix server serving a lot of people at the > University, and the system staff aren't always crazy about upgrading software, > especially (and, from experience, rightfully so) newly released versions. So > experimenting with 4.60 is not going to be relevant for a while. (please don't top-post) If you're using regular mail delivery on your system, you should be able to just compile a new pine and use it for yourself. (On my personal account, they don't use "regular" mail delivery, I think they use qmail, which requires a big hassle each time to get a new pine up and running.) But if you're just using IMAP for example to access your mail, you could just compile a new one. -- top-posting: It's just a bad idea. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Jul 12 16:02:26 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 16:02:26 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6CN2PBD016425; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 16:02:25 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6CN2NUZ022737 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 12 Jul 2004 16:02:23 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6CN2A0r013250; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 16:02:10 -0700 Received: from mxe1.u.washington.edu (mxe1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.136]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6CN1OWr057382 for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 16:01:24 -0700 Received: from kcte.net (kcte.net [199.239.248.2]) by mxe1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6CN1MJF026644 for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 16:01:23 -0700 Received: from grendal.frinabulax.org (68-69-36-139.mgtnwv.adelphia.net [68.69.36.139]) (authenticated bits=0) by kcte.net (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i6CN1Dkc042120 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 19:01:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (grendal.frinabulax.org [127.0.0.1]) by grendal.frinabulax.org (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i6CN13wt023721 for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 19:01:03 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 19:01:03 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: robert delius royar Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: robert delius royar To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Pine Icon suitable for Applescript MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.73, clamav-milter version 0.73a on kcte.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on kcte.net X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=4.5 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,NOSPAM_INC, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT_PINE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Level: X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0.001, __SANE_MSGID 0, __FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, __HAS_MSGID 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Does anyone have an icon for pine that I can attach to an Applescript file that starts up Pine from the desktop? Or is there a way with OS X to convert the icons in contrib so they can be pasted in to the "Get Info" panel that manages OS X icons? -- Dr. Robert Delius Royar Associate Professor of English Morehead State University Morehead, Kentucky -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Jul 12 18:03:57 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 18:03:57 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6D13v9u020489; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 18:03:57 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6D13t8f026960 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 12 Jul 2004 18:03:55 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6D13W6S015954; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 18:03:32 -0700 Received: from mxe2.u.washington.edu (mxe2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6D12iH6115826 for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 18:02:44 -0700 Received: from mail.spacing-guild.net (66-193-230-228.dimenoc.com [66.193.230.228]) by mxe2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i6D12fZb000412 for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 18:02:41 -0700 Received: (qmail 5854 invoked by uid 1012); 13 Jul 2004 01:02:39 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 13 Jul 2004 01:02:39 -0000 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 21:02:39 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Tony Chang To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Expunge does not filter (pine4.60) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-X-Sender: ws@junction.spacing-guild.net X-message-flag: I hate Outlook. X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Tue, 8 Jun 2004 hubert@washington.edu wrote: >On Tue, 8 Jun 2004 pine@slave.umbr.cas.cz wrote: >> If you create filter with some To: pattern on INBOX (internal >> /var/spool/mail/ mailbox) and with some status (I set "If message is >> important"), then if you save this filter and exit from settings, the >> filter is applied. But if you are in INBOX, you set Important some >> message with the correct To: address and press X (as expunge), filter >> doesn't apply. In pine 4.58 this worked fine. > >It turns out that is intentional. It is a safety feature which is tricky >to implement, and for your case, it does not do what you want. On the >other hand, it ought to correctly filter it the next time you come into >this folder, so the problem should be a small one. I just recently upgraded to 4.60 and I'm having the same problem. What do you mean by 'the next time you come into the folder'? I've tried switching to a different folder then switching back, but the filter doesn't apply. The only way I'm able to get the filter to apply is by exiting and restarting pine. I would prefer to not do this as I tend to leave pine running all the time (in a screen session). Would it be possible to make this functionality a tunable feature in the next version? Thanks, Tony -- Tony Chang http://www.aypwip.org From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Jul 12 23:01:04 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 23:01:04 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6D60wLI027945; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 23:00:58 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6D60ufW002475 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 12 Jul 2004 23:00:56 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6D60asE010826; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 23:00:36 -0700 Received: from mxe1.u.washington.edu (mxe1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.136]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6D5xmQS048362 for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 22:59:48 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (node-402403fa.sfo.onnet.us.uu.net [64.36.3.250]) by mxe1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6D5xjDw011393 for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 22:59:46 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i6D601Ow013214 for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 23:00:08 -0700 Received: from localhost (ryanb@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id i6D5xuHk013210 for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 23:00:01 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 22:59:56 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Ryan Barrett To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: remove-trailing-quote patch MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: ryanb owned process doing -bs X-X-Sender: ryanb@localhost.localdomain X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XIII, Probability=13%, Report='REMOVE_PAGE 1.210, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, X_AUTH_WARNING 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_LONG_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi all. I've written a patch that removes trailing quotes from compositions: http://snarfed.org/space/pine+remove+trailing+quote+patch If you try to observe decent netiquette, and quote the smallest relevant piece of emails when you reply, you often need to trim a lot of extra quoted text. This is especially true if you correspond with people who (ick) top-post. This patch automates the drudgery of trimming that excess quoted text. The patch adds an option that removes quoted text if it's the last text in the message, except for (possibly) your signature. At the "Send message?" prompt, it removes the trailing quote so you can see what the trimmed composition will look like before you send. If you cancel, it replaces the trailing quote. It also provides a keystroke to remove trailing quotes manually. Enjoy! -Ryan -- "I do not like all these things that I used to, I'd rather walk through the tall grass..." -Brad Wolfe -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jul 13 00:34:23 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 00:34:23 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6D7YLXi030195; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 00:34:21 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6D7YJMs032277 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 13 Jul 2004 00:34:20 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6D7Y53B011758; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 00:34:05 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6D7XNbd014868 for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 00:33:23 -0700 Received: from slave.umbr.cas.cz (slave.umbr.cas.cz [147.231.252.3]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6D7XJGN031204 for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 00:33:20 -0700 Received: by slave.umbr.cas.cz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E609117EE6; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 09:33:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by slave.umbr.cas.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43D6680AF for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 09:33:20 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 09:33:19 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: pine@slave.umbr.cas.cz Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: pine@slave.umbr.cas.cz To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Expunge does not filter (pine4.60) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-X-Sender: wolf@slave.umbr.cas.cz X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, NO_REAL_NAME 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Tony Chang wrote: > On Tue, 8 Jun 2004 hubert@washington.edu wrote: > > On Tue, 8 Jun 2004 pine@slave.umbr.cas.cz wrote: > > > If you create filter with some To: pattern on INBOX (internal > > > /var/spool/mail/ mailbox) and with some status (I set "If message is > > > important"), then if you save this filter and exit from settings, the > > > filter is applied. But if you are in INBOX, you set Important some > > > message with the correct To: address and press X (as expunge), filter > > > doesn't apply. In pine 4.58 this worked fine. > > > > It turns out that is intentional. It is a safety feature which is tricky > > to implement, and for your case, it does not do what you want. On the > > other hand, it ought to correctly filter it the next time you come into > > this folder, so the problem should be a small one. > > I just recently upgraded to 4.60 and I'm having the same problem. What > do you mean by 'the next time you come into the folder'? I've tried > switching to a different folder then switching back, but the filter > doesn't apply. The only way I'm able to get the filter to apply is by > exiting and restarting pine. I would prefer to not do this as I tend to > leave pine running all the time (in a screen session). > > Would it be possible to make this functionality a tunable feature in > the next version? *** Hi, I have built pine4.60 with new chappa patches again and the filter on expunge works but only in one case: I have rule "if message is not recent (is not new)" If I set the status of the message using "*!n" (change status, not, new), then try to expunge, it doesn't filter. If I leave the folder and go into other folder and then go back, message is not still filtered. If I read the message (status has changed to NOT new), then I do expunge and message is filtered. Any ideas if this is OK or error? Bye Wolf. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jul 13 11:20:08 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 11:20:08 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6DIK7rL019046; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 11:20:07 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6DIK5ws019091 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 13 Jul 2004 11:20:05 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6DIJgQ2014828; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 11:19:42 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6DIIogH064470 for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 11:18:50 -0700 Received: from simmts8-srv.bellnexxia.net (simmts8.bellnexxia.net [206.47.199.166]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6DIIngT016434 for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 11:18:49 -0700 Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([64.229.152.127]) by simmts8-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP id <20040713181807.CSYY28685.simmts8-srv.bellnexxia.net@[192.168.1.100]> for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 14:18:07 -0400 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 14:18:42 -0400 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Joe Clark To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Typing accents Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" ; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Sender: joeclark@joeclark.org@joeclark.org X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XI, Probability=11%, Report='X_NJABL_DUL 1, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __KNOWN_SPAMMER_ADDRESS_2 0, SIGNATURE_LONG_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Pine 4.60, just upgraded on a new box (we=20 switched over within the same ISP) from 4.45.=20 Using a Mac with DataComet-Secure as terminal=20 program, which I quite recommend. Previously, I could always type accents (as with=20 Option-e e for =E9). Now it gives me "[ Unknown=20 Command ]." I don't recall changing anything=20 charset-related in Pine prefs, and, apart from=20 server name, DataComet is unchanged. What could be going wrong? BTW, f=3Df seems to be working adequately.=20 Sometimes it adds spurious quoted lines to ends=20 of messages, though. -- Joe Clark | joeclark@joeclark.org Accessibility Expect criticism if you top-post -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jul 13 16:09:56 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 16:09:56 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6DN9tOT000813; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 16:09:55 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6DN9rvL001654 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 13 Jul 2004 16:09:53 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6DN9d0K008680; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 16:09:39 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6DN8u1u066352 for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 16:08:56 -0700 Received: from mail.arczip.com (mail.arczip.com [216.126.227.134]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6DN8rUJ027549 for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 16:08:53 -0700 Received: from 08-166.149.popsite.net [64.24.187.166] by mail.arczip.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.12) id AB84829012A; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 17:08:52 -0600 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 19:15:24 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: "Dr. Clea F. Rees" Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Dr. Clea F. Rees" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Updated Openssl on Mac OS X MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Pine-Info mailing list X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='SMTPD_IN_RCVD 0.000, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __C230066_P5 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I thought I had managed to compile pine 4.60 on mac os x (10.2.8) with an updated version of openssl installed in /usr/local/... I did this by feeding in the config flags for the openssl certificate, include, library etc. directories. I also did some correcting by hand after configuring and before making. This obviously isn't enough, since pine is compiled to use the default openssl despite my configuration attempts. Can anybody tell me what more is necessary to ensure pine compiles with the updated installation of openssl? Thanks, --- Clea -- Dr. Clea F. Rees Department of Philosophy Sutton Hall, Room 452 1011 South Drive Indiana University of Pennsylvania Indiana PA 15705-1087 U.S.A. Tel: +1-724-357-5614 (o) +1-724-357-2310 (d) NB: From UK, dial 00 before the appropriate number to access the international system. email: rees@arczip.com http://users.arczip.com/rees/ -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jul 13 20:25:57 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 20:25:57 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6E3Pv12008802 for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 20:25:57 -0700 Received: from vsmtp12.tin.it (vsmtp12.tin.it [212.216.176.206]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6E3Pu7L010989 for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 20:25:56 -0700 Received: from ims1a.cp.tin.it (192.168.70.101) by vsmtp12.tin.it (7.0.027) id 40B33B87007BC75F; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 05:25:07 +0200 Received: from [192.168.70.181] by ims1a.cp.tin.it with HTTP; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 05:24:57 +0200 Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 05:24:57 +0200 Message-ID: <40E3CDE10005F0D7@ims1a.cp.tin.it> In-Reply-To: <40E3CDE10004CF98@ims1a.cp.tin.it> From: catimfamily@virgilio.it Subject: URGENT ASSISTANCE FROM WILLIAMS AND SUZAN CATIM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXIIIIIIIII, Probability=69%, Report='NIGERIAN_SUBJECT2 2.900, URGENT_BIZ 1.799, NIGERIAN_BODY1 1.296, LINES_OF_YELLING_3 0.671, LINES_OF_YELLING_2 0.001, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS 0.001, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, MISSING_HEADERS 0.000, __HAS_MSGID 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_45 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_20 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, NO_REAL_NAME 0.000, __MIME_VERSION 0, TO_MALFORMED 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' FROM..WILLIAMS AND SUZAN CATIM. ABIDJAN COTE D' IVOIRE TELEPHONE...0022507131981 Dearest, WE WANT TO ASK FOR YOUR HELP. We are WILLIAMS and Miss SUZAN CATIM from SIERA LEONE. We are writing you NOW from Rep of Cote 'Ivoire where we have been taking= refuge after the brutal war and murder of our perants by the rebels durin= g the renewed fighting in our country SIERA LEONE. Because of the war our late Father sold his shipping company and we came= down here in Cote d'Ivoire to make a deposit of the sum of (US $ 14,300 )fourteen million three hundred thousand dollars and the deposit was made= by our late father for onward transfer to Overseas because of the war but= due to his death,he could not make this ransfer. we were lucky that we traced the documents of this deposit after his dea= th but was affraid to make an effort concerning this money since due to the pollitical situation in IVORY COAST Due to the Continued problem in Ivory Coast ,we are now ready to transfer= this money out and we are seeking for your assistance to help us with you= r bank account to transfer this fund over to your country and also relocate= to your country to further our study and invest this money in a good busi= ness while you will be a guildian to the investment untill we finish our educa= tion. we are willing to offer you 15% of the total sum for your help and a nego= ciable persentage for the investment of this money after transfer. Please,Kindly contact us on this e-mail addresse ABOVE for more details. on getting your response,we will send to you all the documents of this de= posit together with our personal informations as well as copies of first page of our international Paspts HELP US OUT OF THIS OUR SITUATION AND THE ALMIGHTY GOD WILL REWARD YOU. we are looking forward to your urgent respose. Best Regards WILLAMS AND SUZAN CATIM From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jul 13 20:27:13 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 20:27:13 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6E3RCUJ008876 for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 20:27:12 -0700 Received: from vsmtp14.tin.it (vsmtp14.tin.it [212.216.176.118]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6E3RBu3011019 for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 20:27:11 -0700 Received: from ims1a.cp.tin.it (192.168.70.101) by vsmtp14.tin.it (7.0.027) id 40967D8E00A321B7; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 05:26:21 +0200 Received: from [192.168.70.181] by ims1a.cp.tin.it with HTTP; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 05:26:20 +0200 Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 05:26:20 +0200 Message-ID: <40E3CDE10005F0EF@ims1a.cp.tin.it> In-Reply-To: <40E3CDE10004CF98@ims1a.cp.tin.it> From: catimfamily@virgilio.it Subject: URGENT ASSISTANCE FROM WILLIAMS AND SUZAN CATIM To: catimfamily@virgilio.it MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXIIIIIIIII, Probability=69%, Report='NIGERIAN_SUBJECT2 2.900, URGENT_BIZ 1.799, NIGERIAN_BODY1 1.296, LINES_OF_YELLING_3 0.671, LINES_OF_YELLING_2 0.001, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS 0.001, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_45 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_20 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, NO_REAL_NAME 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, IN_REP_TO 0' FROM..WILLIAMS AND SUZAN CATIM. ABIDJAN COTE D' IVOIRE TELEPHONE...0022507131981 Dearest, WE WANT TO ASK FOR YOUR HELP. We are WILLIAMS and Miss SUZAN CATIM from SIERA LEONE. We are writing you NOW from Rep of Cote 'Ivoire where we have been taking= refuge after the brutal war and murder of our perants by the rebels durin= g the renewed fighting in our country SIERA LEONE. Because of the war our late Father sold his shipping company and we came= down here in Cote d'Ivoire to make a deposit of the sum of (US $ 14,300 )fourteen million three hundred thousand dollars and the deposit was made= by our late father for onward transfer to Overseas because of the war but= due to his death,he could not make this ransfer. we were lucky that we traced the documents of this deposit after his dea= th but was affraid to make an effort concerning this money since due to the pollitical situation in IVORY COAST Due to the Continued problem in Ivory Coast ,we are now ready to transfer= this money out and we are seeking for your assistance to help us with you= r bank account to transfer this fund over to your country and also relocate= to your country to further our study and invest this money in a good busi= ness while you will be a guildian to the investment untill we finish our educa= tion. we are willing to offer you 15% of the total sum for your help and a nego= ciable persentage for the investment of this money after transfer. Please,Kindly contact us on this e-mail addresse ABOVE for more details. on getting your response,we will send to you all the documents of this de= posit together with our personal informations as well as copies of first page of our international Paspts HELP US OUT OF THIS OUR SITUATION AND THE ALMIGHTY GOD WILL REWARD YOU. we are looking forward to your urgent respose. Best Regards WILLAMS AND SUZAN CATIM From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jul 14 12:03:57 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 12:03:57 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6EJ3vFb008678; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 12:03:57 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6EJ3tDo005329 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 14 Jul 2004 12:03:55 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6EJ3cm6012824; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 12:03:38 -0700 Received: from mxi2.u.washington.edu (mxi2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.12]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6EJ2MEg032482 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 12:02:22 -0700 Received: from mxout3.cac.washington.edu (mxout3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.166]) by mxi2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6EJ2Li1014193 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 12:02:21 -0700 Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout3.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6EJ2K3c023156 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 12:02:20 -0700 Received: from shiva1.cac.washington.edu (shiva1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.37.171]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6EJ2KcZ028235 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 12:02:20 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 12:02:20 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Steve Hubert To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Expunge does not filter (pine4.60) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Sender: hubert@shiva1.cac.washington.edu X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN > Would it be possible to make this functionality a tunable feature in > the next version? > > Thanks, > Tony Here is one of the release notes for pine 4.61. Maybe this will fix your problem. Relaxed conditions which caused a filter to not be reevaluated before expunging if the user changed flags manually. Now only a manual Undelete may cause the filter to not be reevaluated before expunging. Steve From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jul 14 16:20:00 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 16:20:00 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6ENJxnB021476; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 16:19:59 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6ENJqIb014878 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 14 Jul 2004 16:19:52 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6ENJaTu012206; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 16:19:36 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6ENIrm3032434 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 16:18:53 -0700 Received: from server2.umt.edu (server2.umt.edu [150.131.14.55]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6ENIoVO004268 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 16:18:50 -0700 Received: from ma110.gs.umt.edu ([10.8.9.58]) by server2.umt.edu (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id i6ENIoM26190 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:18:50 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:18:50 -0600 (Mountain Daylight Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Nikolaus Vonessen To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: changing password MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I wonder if there is a pine command to change my password on my (remote) IMAP server. Yours, Nikolaus Vonessen PS I use PC-Pine 4.60 under Windows 2000. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jul 14 16:33:10 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 16:33:10 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6ENX9ih022145; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 16:33:09 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6ENX7FD015014 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 14 Jul 2004 16:33:07 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6ENWsgQ007624; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 16:32:54 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6ENWReu032286 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 16:32:27 -0700 Received: from server2.shellworld.net (ip15.shellworld.net [64.49.204.174]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6ENWOT2007859 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 16:32:25 -0700 Received: from server2.shellworld.net (ricklew@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server2.shellworld.net (8.12.10/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i6ENWOST088304 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 23:32:24 GMT (envelope-from ricklew@shellworld.net) Received: from localhost (ricklew@localhost) by server2.shellworld.net (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id i6ENWOgc088301 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 16:32:24 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 16:32:24 -0700 (MST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Rick Lewis To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Index-format and threads In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: server2.shellworld.net: ricklew owned process doing -bs X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, X_AUTH_WARNING 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi, All, I'm using Pine 4.60 and have my normal index set for status msgno smarttime init subject(100%). I have no problems with this, works great. But when I sort by threads, the index-format changes to what's close to the defaults, with a thread-indicator character or the number of messages in parenthesis. Is there a way (hopefully an easy one) to get the same index-format when reading threads? I'm using mutt-like threads and sorting by ordered-subject. Thanks, --Rick -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jul 14 17:34:16 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:34:16 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6F0YFlu024216; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:34:15 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6F0YDSR017219 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:34:14 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6F0Xr59014150; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:33:53 -0700 Received: from mxe5.u.washington.edu (mxe5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.168]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6F0XMwH103640 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:33:22 -0700 Received: from server2.shellworld.net (ip15.shellworld.net [64.49.204.174]) by mxe5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6F0XJ1F003820 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:33:19 -0700 Received: from server2.shellworld.net (ricklew@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server2.shellworld.net (8.12.10/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i6F0XJST092133 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 00:33:19 GMT (envelope-from ricklew@shellworld.net) Received: from localhost (ricklew@localhost) by server2.shellworld.net (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id i6F0XJSD092130 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:33:19 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:33:19 -0700 (MST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Rick Lewis To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Index-format and threads In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: server2.shellworld.net: ricklew owned process doing -bs X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, X_AUTH_WARNING 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Just noticed that inside threads, (using separate-index-except-for-single-messages), the index-format is honored, just not in the message index itself. --Rick From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jul 14 17:44:48 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:44:48 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6F0im2l024540; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:44:48 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6F0ijWV017064 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:44:46 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6F0iRqL012508; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:44:27 -0700 Received: from mxi2.u.washington.edu (mxi2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.12]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6F0i4dS020142 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:44:04 -0700 Received: from mxout3.cac.washington.edu (mxout3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.166]) by mxi2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6F0i3uJ026889 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:44:04 -0700 Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout3.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6F0i3jj016040 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:44:03 -0700 Received: from shiva1.cac.washington.edu (shiva1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.37.171]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6F0i2ad003655 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:44:03 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:44:02 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Steve Hubert To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Index-format and threads In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Sender: hubert@shiva1.cac.washington.edu X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Rick Lewis wrote: > Is there a way (hopefully an easy one) to get the same index-format when > reading threads? I'm using mutt-like threads and sorting by > ordered-subject. Thanks, --Rick If you use one of the threading-index-styles that starts with "separate" so that it says THREAD INDEX instead of MESSAGE INDEX at the top of the screen, you can't control the format of that THREAD INDEX page. Sorry. Steve Hubert Univ. of Washington: Computing and Communications, Seattle From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Jul 15 05:52:28 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 05:52:28 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6FCqRvM012728; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 05:52:27 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6FCqPWX004315 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 15 Jul 2004 05:52:26 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6FCpvY4014288; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 05:51:57 -0700 Received: from mxe2.u.washington.edu (mxe2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6FCoXbN029332 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 05:50:34 -0700 Received: from pulstar.albedo.art.pl (pulstar.man.szczecin.pl [212.14.1.78]) by mxe2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6FCoTIZ027464 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 05:50:30 -0700 Received: from pulstar.man.szczecin.pl (pulstar.man.szczecin.pl [212.14.1.78]) by pulstar.albedo.art.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3663D35C46 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 14:50:28 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 14:50:28 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Murphy To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Flags and Keywords - how does this work? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: NEWS - Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: murphy@pulstar.man.szczecin.pl X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_LONG_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi, Im try to figure out how to use these Keywords to create a new flags and how to use them later on (Pine 4.60). My idea was to mark some messages with these new flags using keywords automatically, but so far without a succes. Can somebody explain me how these things working? Regards, Murphy -- _||_ _||_ -------------------------------------------------------- ||\ /|| e-mail: murphy@pulstar.albedo.art.pl GG 107745 || || Everything is possible - this is only a question of time \/564\/ -------------------------------------------------------- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Jul 15 17:23:56 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 17:23:56 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6G0Nt9n009641; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 17:23:55 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6G0NsVD029521 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 15 Jul 2004 17:23:54 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6G0Ndbj016834; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 17:23:39 -0700 Received: from mxi2.u.washington.edu (mxi2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.12]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6G0MOdI119812 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 17:22:24 -0700 Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by mxi2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6G0Lwgg019658 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 17:22:24 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6G0LupI029423 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 15 Jul 2004 17:21:57 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6G0LlYr014606; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 17:21:47 -0700 Received: from mxi2.u.washington.edu (mxi2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.12]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6FNw694029398 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 16:58:06 -0700 Received: from mxout5.cac.washington.edu (mxout5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.135]) by mxi2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6FNw6xp016009 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 16:58:06 -0700 Received: from mailhost1.u.washington.edu (mailhost1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.141]) by mxout5.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6FNw5tR014277 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 16:58:05 -0700 Received: from shiva0.cac.washington.edu (shiva0.cac.washington.edu [140.142.37.170]) by mailhost1.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6FNw5Gk016193 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 16:58:05 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 16:58:05 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Jeff Franklin To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Pine 4.61 is now available MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Sender: PINE-ANNOUNCE-owner@u.washington.edu X-To: pine-announce@u.washington.edu X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, URI_HEAVY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN This note is to announce the availability of the Pine Message System version 4.61. This is a maintenance release with only a few new features. Specific information about changes can be found in the built-in release notes ("R" off the Main Menu), or via any of: http://www.washington.edu/pine/ http://www.washington.edu/pine/changes.html ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/docs/ UNIX source code for the latest Pine release is available at: http://www.washington.edu/pine/getpine/ or ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/pine.tar.gz (MD5: 960e3e854f07fae5aaa9a40c4f887526) ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/pine.tar.Z (MD5: f8bcede83c63bfd4198d7e55ee723cf9) ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/pine.tar.bz2 (MD5: 885c6aa4f4f16fcb83a49ef6c025307e) Pre-built binaries are available for a small number of UNIX operating environments via: http://www.washington.edu/pine/getpine/ The PC-Pine distribution is also available at the above url, or at: ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/pcpine/setup_pine_4.61.exe (MD5: 42df78fd76e5129b479a70b7298030e1) Alternatively, the zip file is also available at: ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/pcpine/pm461w32.zip (MD5: 9f8d8a829452ac4efab31d764d8a9e93) Linux RPMs and Debian packages are now also available at: http://www.washington.edu/pine/getpine/linux.html or ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/pine-4.61-1.i386.rpm (MD5: 6ae32409bb7c72859b06a0ae7fae2507) ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/pine-4.61-1.src.rpm (MD5: 574afeb44d48de403e930b94db4129de) ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/pine_4.61_i386.deb (MD5: eab724e953ca1a90cb270ce82f513025) As with all Pine releases, it is important that you carefully test and determine for yourself that it performs suitably in your environment before placing Pine into production use. The Pine Development Team -- ------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/pine-announce.html ------------------------------------------------------------- -- ------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/pine-announce.html ------------------------------------------------------------- -- ------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/pine-announce.html ------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jul 16 01:39:56 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 01:39:56 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6G8doRp022318; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 01:39:50 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6G8dnd2009694 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 16 Jul 2004 01:39:50 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6G8dNJi013648; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 01:39:24 -0700 Received: from mxe4.u.washington.edu (mxe4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6G8cM36066124 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 01:38:22 -0700 Received: from slave.umbr.cas.cz (slave.umbr.cas.cz [147.231.252.3]) by mxe4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6G8cJnx007028 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 01:38:19 -0700 Received: by slave.umbr.cas.cz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DC69817F9D; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 10:38:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by slave.umbr.cas.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A33A7B74 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 10:38:20 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 10:38:20 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: pine@slave.umbr.cas.cz Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: pine@slave.umbr.cas.cz To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Pine 4.61 with Chappa patches MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-X-Sender: wolf@slave.umbr.cas.cz X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, NO_REAL_NAME 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi, anyone can check this error? If started pine4.61 compiled with Chappa all patch, there is a warning "[Sort type "date" is invalid]" This warning disappear when I add in pinerc value "thread" or "arrival" (different than date) into thread-sort-key. There is default value "date" for this but probably some patch destroyed the functionality for "date" in thread-sort-key options. There is no warning in pine 4.61 without chappa patch. Wolf. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jul 16 03:49:07 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 03:49:07 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6GAn15h026915; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 03:49:01 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6GAmwLf015946 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 16 Jul 2004 03:48:59 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6GAmdk2005048; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 03:48:39 -0700 Received: from mxe5.u.washington.edu (mxe5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.168]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6GAjhM2092350 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 03:45:43 -0700 Received: from ticalc.ticalc.org (ticalc.ticalc.org [62.65.69.4]) by mxe5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6GAjfXe031914 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 03:45:42 -0700 Received: from ticalc.ticalc.org (ticalc.ticalc.org [62.65.69.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ticalc.ticalc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 837A8E4EC; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 12:45:40 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 12:45:40 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Henrik Edlund To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.61 with Chappa patches In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: pine@slave.umbr.cas.cz X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 pine@slave.umbr.cas.cz wrote: > > Hi, > > anyone can check this error? > > If started pine4.61 compiled with Chappa all patch, there is a warning > > "[Sort type "date" is invalid]" > > This warning disappear when I add in pinerc value "thread" or "arrival" > (different than date) into thread-sort-key. There is default value "date" > for this but probably some patch destroyed the functionality for "date" in > thread-sort-key options. > > There is no warning in pine 4.61 without chappa patch. The Chappa fancy (threading) patch adds thread-sort-key option. It used to support all the options of sort-key, but we had some discussion about bad usability with having options that does nothing (subject, from, to, etc) and options that does the same as another option (date same as thread). So the fancy patch now (part of all.patch) only takes "arrival" and "thread" (Pine default thread sort without patch) as thread-sort-key. So either change "date" to "thread" in .pinerc, or if Pine can be started, change it in the Config. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jul 16 04:52:12 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 04:52:12 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6GBqBTa029274; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 04:52:11 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6GBqAYE014341 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 16 Jul 2004 04:52:10 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6GBprF2005098; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 04:51:53 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6GBop0i066298 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 04:50:51 -0700 Received: from mail.broadpark.no (mail.broadpark.no [217.13.4.2]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6GBolVt012348 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 04:50:48 -0700 Received: from pcgv (49.80-202-225.nextgentel.com [80.202.225.49]) by mail.broadpark.no (Postfix) with SMTP id 1A6065A74 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 13:51:18 +0200 (MEST) Message-Id: <124001c46b2b$21bac2f0$0600000a@broadpark.no> Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 13:50:46 +0200 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Gisle Vanem" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Windows resources MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=X, Probability=10%, Report='PRIORITY_NO_NAME 0.716, __OUTLOOK_MSGID_1 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, __HAS_MSGID 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi list. This is my first post. I was a avid Pine user years ago. It's nice to see the Windows version has added some GUI elements (to make it a bit more modern). But I prefer the faster TUI interface. Now I'd like to build PC-Pine with MingW (making my own makefile if I have to). Anybody built it with MingW/gcc 3.3 lately? Just briefly skimming through the source/makefiles, I cannot find the resource files anywhere (the .rc-files that makes up the menus etc.). Where are they; do they get generated? I downloaded the latest pine.tar.bz2 expecting everything needed for building it, to be there. Maybe not.. --gv -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jul 16 06:30:34 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 06:30:34 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6GDUX36031303; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 06:30:33 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6GDUWAU016599 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 16 Jul 2004 06:30:33 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6GDUCM0008606; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 06:30:13 -0700 Received: from mxe2.u.washington.edu (mxe2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6GDTAa2066012 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 06:29:10 -0700 Received: from falcon.dickinson.edu ([64.9.63.183]) by mxe2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6GDT53l024452 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 06:29:06 -0700 Received: from falcon.dickinson.edu by falcon.dickinson.edu (8.8.8/1.1.22.3/25Feb99-0911AM) id JAA0000007424; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 09:29:21 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 09:29:21 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Don Newcomer To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Pine 4.61 build MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Info mailing list X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __C230066_P5 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I'm trying to build Pine 4.61 on my HP/UX 11.22 box and ran into the following error: ar: creating libpico.a : libpico.a gcc -g -DDEBUG -Dhpp -DJOB_CONTROL -DPOSIX -DMOUSE -c main.c gcc -g -DDEBUG -Dhpp -DJOB_CONTROL -DPOSIX -DMOUSE main.o libpico.a -ltermcap -lV3 -o pico ld: Can't find library or mismatched ABI for -ltermcap Fatal error. collect2: ld returned 1 exit status *** Error exit code 1 Stop. The command used to do the build was './build NOSSL ghp'. Is there a problem or is this another HP/UX compatibility issue between HP/UX 10 and 11i? Thank in advance. Don Newcomer Senior Manager, Systems Infrastructure Systems Department Library and Information Services Dickinson College P.O. Box 1773 Carlisle, PA 17013 717-245-1256 (Voice) 717-245-1690 (FAX) newcomer@dickinson.edu -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jul 16 06:38:00 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 06:38:00 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6GDbxCc031476; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 06:37:59 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6GDbwdj016774 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 16 Jul 2004 06:37:59 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6GDbjKW013202; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 06:37:45 -0700 Received: from mxe4.u.washington.edu (mxe4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6GDaoq3029382 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 06:36:52 -0700 Received: from raptor.micronas.com (raptor.micronas.com [192.166.137.1]) by mxe4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i6GDakR9017550 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 06:36:47 -0700 Received: from virtue.micronas.com by raptor.micronas.com via smtpd (for mxe4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) with SMTP; 16 Jul 2004 13:36:46 UT Received: from ambassador.micronas.com [172.23.3.60] by virtue.micronas.com with XWall v3.30 ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 15:36:43 +0200 Received: from n-aadolf.Micronas.com ([172.23.4.242]) by Ambassador.Micronas.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Fri, 16 Jul 2004 15:36:43 +0200 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 15:36:43 +0200 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Alexander Adolf To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: PC-Pine 4.61 Solved My Bugs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Warning: UNAuthenticated Sender X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Jul 2004 13:36:43.0373 (UTC) FILETIME=[EE9C11D0:01C46B39] X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __HAS_XOAT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Dear Pinesters, I didn't use PC-Pine 4.60 since it crashed when opening any mailbox without a network connection available (#move INBOX) and when exiting after delete or delete/expunge. I stayed on 4.58 instead. Today I installed 4.61 and found both problems fixed plus noticeably increased filtering speed. Excellent! Thanks a lot to all who have contributed! Cheers from goudy old Germany, --alex -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jul 16 07:27:54 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 07:27:54 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6GERmhK032655; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 07:27:48 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6GERlF6018266 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 16 Jul 2004 07:27:47 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6GERS9g018364; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 07:27:28 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6GEQb3q115770 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 07:26:37 -0700 Received: from ticalc.ticalc.org (ticalc.ticalc.org [62.65.69.4]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6GEQXtP003553 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 07:26:34 -0700 Received: from ticalc.ticalc.org (ticalc.ticalc.org [62.65.69.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ticalc.ticalc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37F4CE4EF; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 16:26:33 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 16:26:32 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Henrik Edlund To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: reply-indent-string and flowed reply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Possible the help text shown at the end of this message, in 4.61, could be improved and possible split in two options, reply-indent-string and display-indent-string. If I reply to a quoted messages with "> > >" (in Message Text view) Pine will render this as ">>>" in the Composer. Well, ">>>" is what Pine must send in order to follow the RFC for flowed text, but it is not what was in the original email. Maybe this conversion when doing reply is okay, maybe it is not, I am not sure myself how I feel about it at this stage. (But when sending, any "> > >" must be converted to ">>>" before handing off to MTA if flowed text.) Thing now is, that when I get an incoming flowed message with ">>>", Pine will convert this to "> > >" before displaying it in Message Text view. This is where I want display-indent-string (or maybe display-quote-string?) to come in. If I set this option to "| " then Pine would convert the ">>>" to "| | | " before display (but it would still be ">>>" in the message source saved on disk). If we go back to the second paragraph above and my question to myself if it was correct of Pine to show ">>>" in the Composer. Maybe it is here Pine should use the reply-indent-string ("> " per default). It should render the message I reply to with "> > >" or "| | |" if that is what I set reply-indent-string to. Before the message is handed off to the MTA, then Pine should convert all "reply-indent-string" into ">" so that the message is in conformance with the flowed text RFC. What do you think? --- snip --- OPTION: Reply-Indent-String This option specifies an aspect of Pine's Reply command. When a message is replied to and the text of the message is included, the included text usually has the string "> " prepended to each line indicating it is quoted text. (In case you haven't seen this before, "string" is a technical term which means chunk of text.) --- snip --- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jul 16 07:39:26 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 07:39:26 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6GEdPV8000531; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 07:39:25 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6GEdOm4022037 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 16 Jul 2004 07:39:24 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6GEd7IX008568; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 07:39:07 -0700 Received: from mxe4.u.washington.edu (mxe4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6GEbjXq115914 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 07:37:45 -0700 Received: from ticalc.ticalc.org (ticalc.ticalc.org [62.65.69.4]) by mxe4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6GEbgdr028796 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 07:37:42 -0700 Received: from ticalc.ticalc.org (ticalc.ticalc.org [62.65.69.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ticalc.ticalc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E82EE4EC; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 16:37:41 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 16:37:41 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Henrik Edlund To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: reply-indent-string and flowed reply In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Henrik Edlund wrote: > If I reply to a quoted messages with "> > >" (in Message Text view) Pine > will render this as ">>>" in the Composer. Well, ">>>" is what Pine must > send in order to follow the RFC for flowed text, but it is not what was > in the original email. Maybe this conversion when doing reply is okay, > maybe it is not, I am not sure myself how I feel about it at this stage. > (But when sending, any "> > >" must be converted to ">>>" before handing > off to MTA if flowed text.) The implicit conversion from "> > >" to ">>>" when replying also causes problems when using the ^V NoFlow option of ^X Send. As Pine changed all the "> > >" into ">>>", if NoFlow is enabled, the message sent in Fixed format will now actually have ">>>" and not "> > >" (as in original message). I think this is a bug. It seems to me the conversion from pine-indent-string to format-flowed-indent-string should take place when the message is actually sent, after we know if the user finally choose Flow or NoFlow. Also, is it possible so that the help text for reply-indent-string that today states that if one changes it, the message will not be flowed, should then really be: ''If the message is sent using flowed text, the indent string specified here will simply be ignored and internally converted to the standard ">" before message is sent. If you choose NoFlow just before sending, even if flowed text is turned on by default, this string will still be used though.'' //Henrik From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jul 16 09:49:02 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 09:49:02 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6GGn0cT005789; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 09:49:00 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6GGmwjn026757 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 16 Jul 2004 09:48:59 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6GGme6X012450; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 09:48:41 -0700 Received: from mxu9.u.washington.edu (mxu9.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.174]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6GGlVO1095474 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 09:47:31 -0700 Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1]) by mxu9.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6GGlUsI013091 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 09:47:30 -0700 Received: from zeno1.math.washington.edu (IDENT:2ItRw0TxCTJjZnBjEBV4IEc0TzInu5Kf@zeno1.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.4]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i6GGlQLb013053; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 09:47:26 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 09:47:26 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.61 with Chappa patches In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: pine@slave.umbr.cas.cz X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.6; VAE 6.26.0.5; VDF 6.26.0.30 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** pine@slave.umbr.cas.cz.nspm wrote in the pine-info list today: :) anyone can check this error? :) :) If started pine4.61 compiled with Chappa all patch, there is a warning :) :) "[Sort type "date" is invalid]" Hello Wolf, I am sorry about this. I had fixed this error (in fact it's not in the "fancy" patch), but I forgot to fix it in the "all patch". It is now fixed. Sorry about that. -- Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jul 16 10:33:17 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 10:33:17 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6GHXGak008020; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 10:33:16 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6GHXFOj028482 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 16 Jul 2004 10:33:16 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6GHWsl5007520; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 10:32:55 -0700 Received: from mxe1.u.washington.edu (mxe1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.136]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6GHW0jo107646 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 10:32:00 -0700 Received: from ticalc.ticalc.org (ticalc.ticalc.org [62.65.69.4]) by mxe1.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6GHVxBC014652 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 10:31:59 -0700 Received: from ticalc.ticalc.org (ticalc.ticalc.org [62.65.69.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ticalc.ticalc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBC31E4EF; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 19:31:57 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 19:31:57 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Henrik Edlund To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.61 with Chappa patches In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Eduardo Chappa X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Eduardo Chappa wrote: > I am sorry about this. I had fixed this error (in fact it's not in the > "fancy" patch), but I forgot to fix it in the "all patch". It is now > fixed. Sorry about that. Ah, that's why I could not replicate it with my fancy.patch so I could give Wolf a patch. (I don't use all.patch.) From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jul 16 11:44:29 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 11:44:29 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6GIiSjE011324; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 11:44:28 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6GIiQ88031698 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 16 Jul 2004 11:44:27 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6GIi9nS016980; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 11:44:09 -0700 Received: from mxe5.u.washington.edu (mxe5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.168]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6GIh2Uc107594 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 11:43:02 -0700 Received: from falcon.dickinson.edu ([64.9.63.92]) by mxe5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6GIgx2F024954 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 11:42:59 -0700 Received: from falcon.dickinson.edu by falcon.dickinson.edu (8.8.8/1.1.22.3/25Feb99-0911AM) id OAA0000008827; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:43:13 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:43:13 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Don Newcomer To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Pine 4.61 weirdness MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Pine Info mailing list X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __C230066_P5 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Here's a strange one for you. I'm running Pine under Tru64 UNIX version 4.0E. For years I've been able to select mail folders based on the presence of unseen messages and zoom (;PUZ is the sequence). Now, since I've built and installed 4.61, this doesn't work anymore. Any ideas? Don Newcomer Senior Manager, Systems Infrastructure Systems Department Library and Information Services Dickinson College P.O. Box 1773 Carlisle, PA 17013 717-245-1256 (Voice) 717-245-1690 (FAX) newcomer@dickinson.edu -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jul 16 13:24:53 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 13:24:53 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6GKOrxr015342; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 13:24:53 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6GKOq2V031010 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 16 Jul 2004 13:24:52 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6GKOcVv008684; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 13:24:39 -0700 Received: from mxu9.u.washington.edu (mxu9.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.174]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6GKNN2u091732 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 13:23:23 -0700 Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1]) by mxu9.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6GKNMNj027102 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 13:23:22 -0700 Received: from zeno1.math.washington.edu (IDENT:xddJMRHpusKIQBQk1abk0ovryMhEJTf2@zeno1.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.4]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i6GKNILb028424; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 13:23:18 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 13:23:18 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.61 weirdness In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Don Newcomer X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.6; VAE 6.26.0.5; VDF 6.26.0.30 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** Don Newcomer (abcnewcomer@dickinson.edu.edo) wrote in the pine-info...: :) Here's a strange one for you. I'm running Pine under Tru64 UNIX :) version 4.0E. For years I've been able to select mail folders based on :) the presence of unseen messages and zoom (;PUZ is the sequence). Now, :) since I've built and installed 4.61, this doesn't work anymore. Any :) ideas? How doesn't it work?. Do you have enabled [X] enable-aggregate-cmd-set? -- Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jul 16 13:41:06 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 13:41:06 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6GKf6jm016174; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 13:41:06 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6GKf4Gs031529 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 16 Jul 2004 13:41:05 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6GKemIu008528; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 13:40:48 -0700 Received: from mxe4.u.washington.edu (mxe4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6GKe4J8115760 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 13:40:04 -0700 Received: from falcon.dickinson.edu ([64.9.63.102]) by mxe4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6GKe1vU015351 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 13:40:01 -0700 Received: from falcon.dickinson.edu by falcon.dickinson.edu (8.8.8/1.1.22.3/25Feb99-0911AM) id QAA0000009486; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 16:40:06 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 16:40:06 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Don Newcomer To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.61 weirdness In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Eduardo Chappa X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __C230066_P5 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Yup. It seems to only work intermittently if my current folder has a new message in it and it only selects that folder. My configuration files haven't changed at all; this worked fine this morning before I migrated from 4.58 to 4.61. Don Newcomer Senior Manager, Systems Infrastructure Systems Department Library and Information Services Dickinson College P.O. Box 1773 Carlisle, PA 17013 717-245-1256 (Voice) 717-245-1690 (FAX) newcomer@dickinson.edu On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Eduardo Chappa wrote: > *** Don Newcomer (abcnewcomer@dickinson.edu.edo) wrote in the pine-info...: > > :) Here's a strange one for you. I'm running Pine under Tru64 UNIX > :) version 4.0E. For years I've been able to select mail folders based on > :) the presence of unseen messages and zoom (;PUZ is the sequence). Now, > :) since I've built and installed 4.61, this doesn't work anymore. Any > :) ideas? > > How doesn't it work?. Do you have enabled [X] enable-aggregate-cmd-set? > > -- > Eduardo > http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ > From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jul 16 14:28:17 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:28:17 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6GLSHSr018771; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:28:17 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6GLSF7e000858 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:28:16 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6GLRvtp014628; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:27:58 -0700 Received: from mxe4.u.washington.edu (mxe4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6GLQnaL092252 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:26:49 -0700 Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mxe4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6GLQkSB025689 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:26:46 -0700 Received: from mailgate2.apple.com (a17-128-100-204.apple.com [17.128.100.204]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6GLRdjh002413 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:27:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay3.apple.com (relay3.apple.com) by mailgate2.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.6) with ESMTP id for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:26:45 -0700 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6GLQitj027986 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:26:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:26:42 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: pine URL detection sometimes fails MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I have a certain email where the URL detection fails.. The URL is similar to: http://a.b.com/X/Y/whatever.php?whatever=number And the URL detection only selects up through the ? However, I can't reproduce it. Even copying/pasting the EXACT URL into a new mail to myself doesn't show the problem. But in the original email, it happens every time. (4.61, but I'm almost positive I've seen this before) -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jul 16 14:36:56 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:36:56 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6GLaunM019182; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:36:56 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6GLatin001130 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:36:55 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6GLaekE017908; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:36:40 -0700 Received: from mxi2.u.washington.edu (mxi2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.12]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6GLZwJT107634 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:35:58 -0700 Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.134]) by mxi2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6GLZwe9030854 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:35:58 -0700 Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9]) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6GLZv5U008166 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:35:57 -0700 Received: from pigeon.cac.washington.edu (pigeon.cac.washington.edu [128.95.135.112]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6GLZv2i019471 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:35:57 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:35:57 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Jeff Franklin To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: pine URL detection sometimes fails In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Matt Ackeret wrote: > > I have a certain email where the URL detection fails.. > > The URL is similar to: > > http://a.b.com/X/Y/whatever.php?whatever=number > > And the URL detection only selects up through the ? > > However, I can't reproduce it. Even copying/pasting the EXACT URL into a new > mail to myself doesn't show the problem. But in the original email, it happens > every time. (4.61, but I'm almost positive I've seen this before) > If you view this message with full headers, do you get the same problem? There are ways to generate a special type of flowed message where this would happen, but if the highlight didn't work with full headers then that would be a problem I'm not familiar with. Is this problem new to 4.61? Thanks, Jeff From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jul 16 14:42:36 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:42:36 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6GLgZZm019468; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:42:35 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6GLgYJ5005975 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:42:35 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6GLgJiB012480; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:42:19 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6GLfoL5063834 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:41:50 -0700 Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6GLfmtq019708 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:41:48 -0700 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6GLgf8g004926 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:42:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay2.apple.com (relay2.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.12) with ESMTP id for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:41:47 -0700 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay2.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6GLfkKn001224 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:41:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:41:44 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: pine URL detection sometimes fails In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Jeff Franklin wrote: > On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Matt Ackeret wrote: >> every time. (4.61, but I'm almost positive I've seen this before) > > If you view this message with full headers, do you get the same problem? There > are ways to generate a special type of flowed message where this would happen, > but if the highlight didn't work with full headers then that would be a > problem I'm not familiar with. Yes, the problem happens with full headers. But I do see that with full headers, it shows up like http://url? whatever=whatevernum So the part after the question mark shows up on a separate line _in full header mode_. (I even made my window very wide just to make sure that didn't have anything to do with it.) > Is this problem new to 4.61? As I said above, I didn't think so.. but I did run the 4.60 I had and confirmed, the problem is not new. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jul 16 14:44:18 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:44:18 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6GLiHEk019561; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:44:17 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6GLiE0j006021 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:44:14 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6GLhwGQ007646; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:43:58 -0700 Received: from mxe2.u.washington.edu (mxe2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6GLhPx5054226 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:43:25 -0700 Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mxe2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6GLhMWu008381 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:43:22 -0700 Received: from mailgate2.apple.com (a17-128-100-204.apple.com [17.128.100.204]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6GLiELA005119 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:44:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay4.apple.com (relay4.apple.com) by mailgate2.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.6) with ESMTP id for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:43:21 -0700 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6GLhJJx026381 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:43:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:43:17 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: pine URL detection sometimes fails In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Matt Ackeret wrote: >Yes, the problem happens with full headers. But I do see that with full >headers, it shows up like > >http://url? >whatever=whatevernum > >So the part after the question mark shows up on a separate line _in full header >mode_. (I even made my window very wide just to make sure that didn't have >anything to do with it.) Oh yeah, and here's the content-type of the offending message Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jul 16 14:50:06 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:50:06 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6GLo5G6019865; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:50:05 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6GLo2lK006245 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:50:02 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6GLno89008432; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:49:50 -0700 Received: from mxe2.u.washington.edu (mxe2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6GLnASr063900 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:49:10 -0700 Received: from thumbler.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (thumbler.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.240.45]) by mxe2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6GLn7NJ009735 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:49:07 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thumbler.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3FC013778B; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 23:49:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lepidus.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (lepidus.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.240.72]) by thumbler.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C66D1376E5; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 23:49:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ace.ulyssis.org (ace.ulyssis.student.kuleuven.ac.be [193.190.253.36]) by lepidus.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29EC33801A0; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 23:49:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ace.ulyssis.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ace.ulyssis.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i6GLn6dG022896; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 23:49:06 +0200 Received: from localhost (godot@localhost) by ace.ulyssis.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id i6GLn537022892; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 23:49:05 +0200 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 23:49:05 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Danny De Cock To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: RE: S/MIME patch for Pine 4.60 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Cc: Henrik Edlund X-Virus-Scanned: by KULeuven Antivirus Cluster X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN hi, after having received the smime patch for pine4.58 from henrik, I slightly changed it to make it work with pine4.61. next to this version synchronization, I have corrected and extended some user interface features to improve the signer's (certificate) details. I successfully tested it with cygwin, linux (redhat and debian) and with osf1. if you should experience problems (e.g., segmentation faults when pressing ctrl-e when trying to view a signer's details), you might consider recompiling openssl (with time stamping support) and the patched pine itself using gcc-2.95. the patch and detailed installation instructions can be found here: http://godot.studentenweb.org/debian/index_bw.cgi#pinesmime cu, g. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jul 16 16:01:22 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 16:01:22 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6GN1MaF022695; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 16:01:22 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6GN1L7n008868 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 16 Jul 2004 16:01:21 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6GN154u017094; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 16:01:05 -0700 Received: from mxu9.u.washington.edu (mxu9.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.174]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6GMxld0075376 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 15:59:47 -0700 Received: from mxout5.cac.washington.edu (mxout5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.135]) by mxu9.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6GMxkKZ027219 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 15:59:46 -0700 Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9]) by mxout5.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6GMxjA7008609; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 15:59:46 -0700 Received: from pigeon.cac.washington.edu (pigeon.cac.washington.edu [128.95.135.112]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6GMxjRj028271 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT); Fri, 16 Jul 2004 15:59:45 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 15:59:45 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Jeff Franklin To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: pine URL detection sometimes fails In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Matt Ackeret X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Matt Ackeret wrote: > Oh yeah, and here's the content-type of the offending message > Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed That's the scenario I was talking about. What the generating client did is a gray area in the spec wrt its use of delsp. It appears that they aren't using delsp for its intended purpose. Therefore, we are doing the safest (and easiest) thing in treating the two lines as separate entities and not treating them as part of the same URL. We will keep our eye out for clarifications on this behavior, though. Jeff From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jul 16 17:39:16 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 17:39:16 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6H0dG65026091; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 17:39:16 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6H0dEM8012197 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 16 Jul 2004 17:39:15 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6H0cx8f011436; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 17:38:59 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6H0bXWZ107628 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 17:37:33 -0700 Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6H0bVd4001791 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 17:37:31 -0700 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6H0cOpJ024781 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 17:38:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay1.apple.com (relay1.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.12) with ESMTP id for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 17:37:30 -0700 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay1.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6H0bEGg012291 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 17:37:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 17:37:12 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: pine URL detection sometimes fails In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Jeff Franklin wrote: > On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Matt Ackeret wrote: > >> Oh yeah, and here's the content-type of the offending message >> Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed > > That's the scenario I was talking about. What the generating client did is a > gray area in the spec wrt its use of delsp. It appears that they aren't using > delsp for its intended purpose. Therefore, we are doing the safest (and > easiest) thing in treating the two lines as separate entities and not treating > them as part of the same URL. We will keep our eye out for clarifications on > this behavior, though. Do you have more specifics? The "generating client" is Apple's Mail.app. I could write up a bug on the area.. I just don't know the details. I know you said gray area.. but it still might be worth a bug. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sat Jul 17 13:14:18 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 13:14:18 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6HKEH4S021183 for ; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 13:14:17 -0700 Received: from postfix7.ofir.com ([193.0.243.234]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6HKEE9O001411 for ; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 13:14:15 -0700 Received: from webmail6.ofir.dk (webmail6.ofir.dom [192.168.197.26]) by postfix7.ofir.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 443E5AC8CE; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 22:13:55 +0200 (CEST) X-WM-Posted-At: webmail6.ofir.dk; Sat, 17 Jul 04 22:14:03 +0200 Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 22:14:03 +0200 Sender: Thomas Mbuso From: Thomas Mbuso To: thomasmbuso1@bluemail.dk X-EXP32-SerialNo: 00002117 Subject: Please contact me Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: WebMail (Hydra) SMTP v3.51 Message-Id: <20040717201355.443E5AC8CE@postfix7.ofir.com> X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXIII, Probability=73%, Report='UNCLAIMED_MONEY 2.900, NIGERIAN_BODY1 1.296, DCC_BULK_MEDIUM 1, NA_DOLLARS 0.765, US_DOLLARS_3 0.694, DEAR_FRIEND 0.363, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_7 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_26 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY_100 0, __DCC_FUZ1_100 0, __DCC_FUZ2_100 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0' DEPARTMENT OF MINERALS AND ENERGY PRETORIA, SOUTH AFRICA. Kindly reply:thomasmbuso2@mail2southafrica.com Dear Friend, It is my great pleasure to write you this letter on behalf of my colleagues.I have decided to seek a confidential co-operation with you in the execution of a deal hereunder for the benefit of all parties and hope you will keep it confidential because of the nature of the business.Within the Department of Minerals and Energy where I work as an Assistant Director of Audit,with the co-operation of two other top officials,we have in our possession an overdue contractor payment in US Dollars funds.The said funds represent certain percentage of the contract value executed on behalf of my Department by a foreign contracting firm,(Pearls Ltd) which we the officials over-invoiced to the amount of US$15,200,000 (Fifteen Million Two Hundred Thousand US Dollars).Since the present elected Government is determined to pay foreign contractors all debts owed,so as to maintain good relations with foreign governments and non-governmental agencies,we included our bills for approvals with the Department of Finance and the Reserve Bank of South Africa (RBSA).We are 100% sure of funds approvals to anyone or company we (The Audit Committee) recommend as part of the sub-contractors who did jobs for the Department. We are seeking your assistance to front as the sub-contractor of the unclaimed funds,since we are not allowed to operate foreign accounts.Details and change of beneficiary information upon application for claim to reflect payment and approvals will be secured on behalf of you/your Company. My colleagues and I are prepared to give you US$2.5m while we take US$7.4m and the balance of US$5.3m for taxes and miscellaneous expenses incurred. This business is completely safe and secure,provided you treat it with utmost confidentiality.It does not matter whether you/your Company does contract projects,as a transfer of rights will be secured in favour of you/your Company through the Federal High Court of South Africa before we can proceed. I have reposed my confidence in you and hope that you will not disappoint us.Kindly notify me immediately via my alternative email (thomasmbuso2@mail2southafrica.com) for further details upon your acceptance of this proposal. Yours Faithfully, Thomas Mbuso (Mr) NB:Please contact me via(thomasmbuso2@mail2southafrica.com) _________________________________________________________________________ OFiR Spil - Vind 1.000 vis af kroner! Bes=F8g http://spil.ofir.dk OFiR Kontakt - Find din nye ven el. partner p=E5 http://kontakt.ofir.dk From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun Jul 18 09:24:08 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 18 Jul 2004 09:24:08 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6IGO7In021987; Sun, 18 Jul 2004 09:24:07 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6IGO1Jh032308 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 18 Jul 2004 09:24:01 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6IGNZbk016880; Sun, 18 Jul 2004 09:23:36 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6IGMAOv092934 for ; Sun, 18 Jul 2004 09:22:10 -0700 Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6IGM6Yl024527 for ; Sun, 18 Jul 2004 09:22:07 -0700 Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BmEQP-0006Y7-00 for ; Sun, 18 Jul 2004 18:22:05 +0200 Received: from h00095b59a65e.ne.client2.attbi.com ([24.34.148.155]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 18 Jul 2004 18:22:05 +0200 Received: from jtwdyp by h00095b59a65e.ne.client2.attbi.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 18 Jul 2004 18:22:05 +0200 Message-Id: Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 12:20:42 -0400 Reply-To: "Joe(theWordy)Philbrook" Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Joe(theWordy)Philbrook" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Odd filter behavior[MSRF], or do I misunderstand something? [pine4.60] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Sender: news X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: h00095b59a65e.ne.client2.attbi.com X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='SUPERLONG_LINE 0.003, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - ---------- Resent message ---------- Hello, I've been using pine as my chosen mail-reader for so long that I almost can't remember using anything else of my own free will. I'm currently using it at home on a multi-boot PC where I've got pine 4.60 installed on Fedora Core 1 & Fedora Core 2 & pine 4.58 on Mandrake 9.1. I mostly do my mail/news reading while in FC2. When I joined Fedora's mailing list I found that I simply had to start filtering my mail somehow. I chose to learn to use pine's filtering capabilities. Which worked well on my local folders. I also use pine to import mail from my various non-local inboxes. which currently amount to several pop accounts on one ISP's pop server. I also use it for some newsgroups. The problems arose when I decided to use pines filters to selectively move mail & newsgroup messages based on a specific incoming folder. Problem # 1 of 2) I discovered that: Specific incoming folders didn't differentiate between separate pop inbox folders... when I selected any ONE of the pop accounts as a specific incoming folder in the current folder type portion of a filter rule, the rule would actually be applied to ANY of the three pop accounts... For example, consider this extract from my ~/.pinerc which, if I understand the help text, should cause mail from anyone in my addressbook(s) to be moved to the local folder appropriate for which mail account they sent to... LIT:pattern="/NICK=KnownSender_W/FLDTYPE=SPEC/FOLDER=W1LDcard/AFROM=YES" action="/FILTER=1/FOLDER=\/home\/jtwdyp\/mail\/KnownToWildcard/NOKILL=1", LIT:pattern="/NICK=KnownSender_J/FLDTYPE=SPEC/FOLDER=jtwdyp/AFROM=YES" action="/FILTER=1/FOLDER=\/home\/jtwdyp\/mail\/KnownToJtwdyp/NOKILL=1", LIT:pattern="/NICK=KnownSender_S/FLDTYPE=SPEC/FOLDER=spamen0t/AFROM=YES" action="/FILTER=1/FOLDER=\/home\/jtwdyp\/mail\/KnownToSpamen0t/NOKILL=1", In practice mail from anybody in the addressbook(s) sending mail to the pop accounts associated with the "jtwdyp" and "spamen0t" incoming folders were being moved to the "KnownToWildcard" local folder... This problem didn't happen when I tested the sorting rule on three local folders. I checked the pine 4.58 installed to my Mandrake linux, and it did the same thing... Is there something I'm misunderstanding here or shouldn't I be able to sort mail having otherwise the same characteristics to different local folders based on which remote pop server inbox they are being moved from??? ("Yeah, I know I could catch "most" of them via the To: header, but believe it or not I get "SOME" mail sent to me with missing To: & Cc: header lines that don't meet my personal description of spam. And in those cases I "_really_" want to be aware of which mailbox they are sending it to...) I suppose I can take the time to do a MSRF{select appropriate filter}$UEY to reorder the KnownSender* rules so that the appropriate one is found first before each/every time I open an pop account incoming folder, But that is a REAL pain in the orifice. Is there a more reasonable way I can accomplish this? - - - - - - - - -< s n i p >- - - - - - - - - - Problem # 2 of 2) I discovered that: Specific incoming (News) folders sometimes get applied to the local INBOX. When I simply wanted to import all the "new" messages from a subscribed newsgroup to a local folder where further processing could be accomplished much more quickly {yeah I know this "COULD" be done by way of running my own local news spool, but I would want chron to help me manage that, And you never know when I'll be running a different linux, or win98se or even have reason to powerdown this personal PC when the chron job should start... So personal mail folders work better for me} Anyway, the long and the short of it is as long as I didn't mind any local linux INBOX messages being moved to the local fedora folder, this worked: LIT:pattern="/NICK=SpecificNewsIfFedoraNewsGgroupToFedora-Now/FLDTYPE=SPEC/FOLDER={news.gmane.org\/nntp}#news.gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/STATD=NO" action="/FILTER=1/FOLDER=\/home\/jtwdyp\/mail\/fedora-now/NOKILL=1", But since I like to keep local linux mail (such as messages sent to me by one of my bash scripts...) in my INBOX until I deal with them I played with it until I found that simply by adding a extra header field to the rule (specifically "Newsgroups:") I could prevent this from being applied to the INBOX folder even if I left it blank. LIT:pattern="/NICK=SpecificNewsIfFedoraNewsGgroupToFedora-Now/ARBNewsgroups=/FLDTYPE=SPEC/FOLDER={news.gmane.org\/nntp}#news.gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/STATD=NO" action="/FILTER=1/FOLDER=\/home\/jtwdyp\/mail\/fedora-now/NOKILL=1", The thing is, Once I added that extra header field, I don't see anything to even suggest that the messages in INBOX are bing checked for anything. But when I tried the 1st version of the rule I couldn't open INBOX without dumping it's contents into fedora-now... Is this a known problem or a fluke? Simply adding that header seams to have solved it for me, but I'm curious if anyone could tell me why this happened? Thanks! - - -- | ? ? | | -=- -=- I'm NOT clueless... | But I just don't know. | ^ Joe (theWordy) Philbrook | --- J(tWdy)P | | ? ? ############################################################## # You can find my public gpg key at http://pgpkeys.mit.edu/ # ############################################################## -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA+qLcRZ/61mwhY94RAtGtAJ9z9+cBGltS3MoECU9bJGlraJnoKACgs4sz fmbXCbcqldmu0C1pgvpaE8c= =4mTA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Jul 19 01:45:52 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 01:45:52 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6J8jmSw012404; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 01:45:49 -0700 Received: from mail02.infosat.net (mailout06.infosat.net [66.18.69.6]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6J8jWNe009973; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 01:45:37 -0700 Received: from [66.18.70.41] (HELO mail01.infosat.net) by mail02.infosat.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 91939606; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 10:44:33 +0200 Received: from [165.165.155.156] (account kingj73@mailbox.co.za) by mail01.infosat.net (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.1.8) with HTTP id 374389865; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 10:44:33 +0200 From: "Kingsley John" Subject: URGENT ASSISTANCE To: kingj73@mailbox.co.za X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.1.8 Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 10:44:33 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXII, Probability=82%, Report='NIGERIAN_SUBJECT2 2.900, URGENT_BIZ 1.799, NIGERIAN_BODY1 1.296, RISK_FREE 1.278, LINES_OF_YELLING_3 0.671, CLICK_BELOW 0.089, LINES_OF_YELLING_2 0.001, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS 0.001, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0.001, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_45 0, __CHILD_PORN_NOT_1 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_20 0, __FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0, __CLICK_BELOW 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __DCC_BODY_10 0, __DCC_FUZ1_10 0, __DCC_FUZ2_10 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0' OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN CONTRACT AWARD COMMITTEE (ECOWAS) HEADQUARTERS LOME REPULIC OF TOGO. WEST AFRICA ATTN/SIR/MADAM, I am Dr,Kingsly John (KSM) the chairman, contract awarding and procurement committee of economic community of west African states with Headquarters in lome Togo Forgive my indignation if this massage comes to you as a surprise and if it might offend you witho ut your prior consent and writing through this channel,Now i resident in South Africa with my family Two boy's,one girl and my wife because i see this as mine opporunity i can die in government office . I got your information in business directories from togolaise chamber of commerce and industries when l was searching for a reliable,honest and trustworthy person to entrust this business with.after discussing my view and your profile with my colleagues, they were very much satisfied and we decided to contact you immediately for this mutual business relationship. We wish to transfer the sum of $45.5M US to your company account. This fund was a residue of the over invoiced contract bills awarded by us for the supply of ammunitions, hard/ soft wares,pharmaceutical and medical items, light and heavy duty vehicles,apparels and other administrative logistics etc for (ECOMOG) in sierraLeone and Liberia during the peace keeping projects this deal was deliberately hatched out and carefully protected with all attendant lope holes sealed off. As the chairman of (CAC),l have the cooperation and mandate of the financial director of the organization.We arranged and over invoiced the contract funds supplied by different companies from different countries during the crisis. It was our consensus to seek the assistance of a willing foreigner to provide us with the facilities to transfer this money out of west Africa this is born out of our belief in the non- stable and spurious political nature of this sub-region.The original contractors have been duly paid by banque centarle des etats de l, afrique del ouest central bank of the west African states)through our banker ECO-BANK this balance is suspended in the escrow accounts awaiting claims by any foreign company of our choice.We intend to pay out this fund NOW as the organization is winding up its activities since the aim of returning PEACE to the countries and the coast has been achieved.This is the more reason why needed your assistance to provide an account that can sustain this fund for safe keeping and our future investment with your comprehensive advise, assistance and partnership in your country .it is however agreed, as the account owner in this deal to allow you 20% of the total sum as compensation, 75% will be held on trust for us while 5% will be used to defray any incidenental charges and cost during the course of the transaction. This transaction will be successfully concluded within 14 days if you accord us your unalloyed and due co-operation you should provide the following YOUR COMPANY NAME WITH COMPLETE ADDRESS TEL AND FAX NUMBERS,the name of your bank its address,TEL/FAX AND TELEX NUMBER. THE COMPLETE MAIL ADDRESS OF THE BENEFICIARY,upon the receipt of this information, So we solicit for your unreserved Confidentiality and Utmost secret in this business.We hope to retire peacefully and leave a honorable business life after ward. There is no risk involve keep this secret and confidential within you only. Reply me upon the receipt of this massage for more details reply ASAP Thanks for your proper under standing. With regards. Dr.Kingsly John . {Contact me via Tel:+27-72-5966095}. Private email:{kingj73@tiscali.co.uk} _____________________________________________________________________ For super low premiums ,click here http://www.dialdirect.co.za/quote From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Jul 19 12:17:57 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:17:57 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6JJHuvu002267; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:17:56 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6JJHtop031839 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:17:55 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6JJHYXL011994; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:17:34 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6JJGXMW091868 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:16:33 -0700 Received: from noella.mindsec.com (noella.mindsec.com [216.198.14.227]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6JJGWa5022862 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:16:33 -0700 Received: from noella.mindsec.com (noella.mindsec.com [216.198.14.227]) by noella.mindsec.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41DB83004D for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:16:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <0407191215080.5923068@somehost.domainz.com> Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:16:32 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Erik Parker To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Header bug in pine 4.61 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Sender: Erik Parker X-GPG-Key: http://www.mindsec.com/staff/eparker/gpg.txt X-Use-Encryption: Encrypt your messages to me with PGP or GPG! X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN There appears to be a bug with the 'show full header' command introduced in Pine 4.61 (Possibly in 4.60, but definetely not before that). If you show full headers on a message, and then hit n or p to go to next or previous message.. it no longer shows the headers, and you have to hit 'h' again to show the headers. I'm not sure when that functionality broke, but it's a real pain to compare headers when you have to hit the h command each time when cycling messages. --- Erik Parker --- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Jul 19 12:25:06 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:25:06 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6JJP5s0002712; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:25:05 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6JJP32G009456 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:25:04 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6JJOhbF015104; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:24:43 -0700 Received: from mxe2.u.washington.edu (mxe2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6JJOAxc031076 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:24:10 -0700 Received: from kcte.net (kcte.net [199.239.248.2]) by mxe2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6JJO6b5002152 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:24:07 -0700 Received: from grendal.frinabulax.org (68-69-36-139.mgtnwv.adelphia.net [68.69.36.139]) (authenticated bits=0) by kcte.net (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i6JJNphp076482 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 19 Jul 2004 15:23:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (grendal.frinabulax.org [127.0.0.1]) by grendal.frinabulax.org (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i6JJNnSE029074; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 15:23:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 15:23:49 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: robert delius royar Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: robert delius royar To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Header bug in pine 4.61 In-Reply-To: <0407191215080.5923068@somehost.domainz.com> References: <0407191215080.5923068@somehost.domainz.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Erik Parker X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.73, clamav-milter version 0.73a on kcte.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on kcte.net X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=4.5 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,IN_REP_TO,NOSPAM_INC,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT_PINE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Level: X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0.001, __SANE_MSGID 0, __FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0, __HAS_MSGID 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Mon, 19 Jul 2004 (12:16 -0700 UTC) Erik Parker wrote: > > There appears to be a bug with the 'show full header' command introduced in > Pine 4.61 (Possibly in 4.60, but definetely not before that). > > If you show full headers on a message, and then hit n or p to go to next or > previous message.. it no longer shows the headers, and you have to hit 'h' > again to show the headers. I'm not sure when that functionality broke, but > it's a real pain to compare headers when you have to hit the h command each > time when cycling messages. I think it would be good if this feature operated differently based on context. For example, if full headers are turned on by the user while looking at the mail index, then each message viewed in that index defaults to full header. If it is turned on in the message, then it follows the new way of toggling header mode off after moving to the next message. -- rdr 15:20 up 40 days, 17:05, 1 user, load averages: 0.39 0.40 0.41 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Jul 19 12:25:48 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:25:48 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6JJPlhL002788; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:25:47 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6JJPk4f032163 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:25:46 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6JJPRIe008588; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:25:27 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6JJPB8D031104 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:25:11 -0700 Received: from noella.mindsec.com (noella.mindsec.com [216.198.14.227]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6JJPAbn025089 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:25:11 -0700 Received: from noella.mindsec.com (noella.mindsec.com [216.198.14.227]) by noella.mindsec.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09ECF3004D; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:25:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <0407191224280.0@somehost.domainz.com> Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:25:10 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Erik Parker To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Header bug in pine 4.61 In-Reply-To: References: <0407191215080.5923068@somehost.domainz.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Sender: Erik Parker X-To: robert delius royar X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-GPG-Key: http://www.mindsec.com/staff/eparker/gpg.txt X-Use-Encryption: Encrypt your messages to me with PGP or GPG! X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN > I think it would be good if this feature operated differently based on > context. For example, if full headers are turned on by the user while > looking at the mail index, then each message viewed in that index defaults to > full header. If it is turned on in the message, then it follows the new way > of toggling header mode off after moving to the next message. I agree with you on that. that was the first thing I tried, thinking maybe they changed it to be that way. But doesn't seem to be the case. Did you confirm on your OSX box the same behavior? From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Jul 19 12:39:23 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:39:23 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6JJdHnH003301; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:39:17 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6JJdGqw032710 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:39:17 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6JJcuRn012478; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:38:56 -0700 Received: from mxe1.u.washington.edu (mxe1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.136]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6JJcUJk091738 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:38:30 -0700 Received: from ticalc.ticalc.org (ticalc.ticalc.org [62.65.69.4]) by mxe1.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6JJcTYb031973 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:38:30 -0700 Received: from ticalc.ticalc.org (ticalc.ticalc.org [62.65.69.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ticalc.ticalc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61EADE4F1; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 21:38:27 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 21:38:26 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Henrik Edlund To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Header bug in pine 4.61 In-Reply-To: <0407191215080.5923068@somehost.domainz.com> References: <0407191215080.5923068@somehost.domainz.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Erik Parker X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Mon, 19 Jul 2004, Erik Parker wrote: > There appears to be a bug with the 'show full header' command introduced > in Pine 4.61 (Possibly in 4.60, but definetely not before that). > > If you show full headers on a message, and then hit n or p to go to next > or previous message.. it no longer shows the headers, and you have to > hit 'h' again to show the headers. I'm not sure when that functionality > broke, but it's a real pain to compare headers when you have to hit the > h command each time when cycling messages. You should probably bother and read the release notes for 4.61: * The behavior of the HdrMode Command has changed slightly. It now reverts back to normal mode when you switch to a new message. It also has an additional state if Quote-Suppression-Threshold is turned on. * The old behavior of the HdrMode Command can be restored by not setting the Quote-Suppression-Threshold and setting the new feature Quell-Full-Header-Auto-Reset From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Jul 19 12:45:44 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:45:44 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6JJjhE2003690; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:45:43 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6JJje5T000536 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:45:40 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6JJjRsN015260; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:45:27 -0700 Received: from mxe5.u.washington.edu (mxe5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.168]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6JJir8x122826 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:44:54 -0700 Received: from kcte.net (kcte.net [199.239.248.2]) by mxe5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6JJiqTr008822 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:44:52 -0700 Received: from grendal.frinabulax.org (68-69-36-139.mgtnwv.adelphia.net [68.69.36.139]) (authenticated bits=0) by kcte.net (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i6JJiluE085831 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 15:44:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (grendal.frinabulax.org [127.0.0.1]) by grendal.frinabulax.org (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i6JJijmV029183 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 15:44:45 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 15:44:45 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: robert delius royar Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: robert delius royar To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Header bug in pine 4.61 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.73, clamav-milter version 0.73a on kcte.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on kcte.net X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=4.5 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,NOSPAM_INC,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT_PINE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Level: X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0.001, __SANE_MSGID 0, __FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, __HAS_MSGID 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Mon, 19 Jul 2004 (12:25 -0700 UTC) Erik Parker wrote: >> I think it would be good if this feature operated differently based on >> context. For example, if full headers are turned on by the user while >> looking at the mail index, then each message viewed in that index >> defaults to full header. If it is turned on in the message, then it >> follows the new way of toggling header mode off after moving to the next >> message. > > I agree with you on that. that was the first thing I tried, thinking maybe > they changed it to be that way. But doesn't seem to be the case. Did you > confirm on your OSX box the same behavior? Yes, and i believe that is the intended behavior based on the release notes about the feature. -- Dr. Robert Delius Royar Associate Professor of English, Morehead State University From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Jul 19 20:53:01 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 20:53:01 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6K3r0Fr022312; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 20:53:00 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6K3qxQE026752 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 19 Jul 2004 20:52:59 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6K3qitU016328; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 20:52:45 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6K3poqm037556 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 20:51:50 -0700 Received: from noella.mindsec.com (noella.mindsec.com [216.198.14.227]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6K3plxV005207 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 20:51:47 -0700 Received: from noella.mindsec.com (noella.mindsec.com [216.198.14.227]) by noella.mindsec.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2148930042; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 20:51:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <0407192050260.0@somehost.domainz.com> Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 20:51:44 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Erik Parker To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Header bug in pine 4.61 In-Reply-To: References: <0407191215080.5923068@somehost.domainz.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Henrik Edlund X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-GPG-Key: http://www.mindsec.com/staff/eparker/gpg.txt X-Use-Encryption: Encrypt your messages to me with PGP or GPG! X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN > You should probably bother and read the release notes for 4.61: Thanks, I'll "bother" to read it next time. > * The behavior of the HdrMode Command has changed slightly. It now > reverts back to normal mode when you switch to a new message. It also > has an additional state if Quote-Suppression-Threshold is turned on. > * The old behavior of the HdrMode Command can be restored by not > setting the Quote-Suppression-Threshold and setting the new feature > Quell-Full-Header-Auto-Reset Features like this shouldn't be turned on by default in an upgrade.. Just my .02.. Should have it as a new option, so people who "bother" to read the release notes, can enable it if they want to. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jul 20 05:11:18 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 05:11:17 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6KCBBHd005036; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 05:11:11 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6KCBA6D006363 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 20 Jul 2004 05:11:11 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6KCAo9t014830; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 05:10:50 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6KC9woD105098 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 05:09:58 -0700 Received: from ticalc.ticalc.org (ticalc.ticalc.org [62.65.69.4]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6KC9s1p032537 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 05:09:55 -0700 Received: from ticalc.ticalc.org (ticalc.ticalc.org [62.65.69.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ticalc.ticalc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53B53E4E7; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 14:09:54 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 14:09:53 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Henrik Edlund To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Header bug in pine 4.61 In-Reply-To: <0407192050260.0@somehost.domainz.com> References: <0407191215080.5923068@somehost.domainz.com> <0407192050260.0@somehost.domainz.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Erik Parker X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Mon, 19 Jul 2004, Erik Parker wrote: > Features like this shouldn't be turned on by default in an upgrade.. > Just my .02.. Should have it as a new option, so people who "bother" to > read the release notes, can enable it if they want to. Flowed text went default _on_ in 4.60 as well. It's not the first time. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jul 20 11:13:07 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 11:13:06 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6KID6Ca017384; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 11:13:06 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6KID5ao021126 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 20 Jul 2004 11:13:05 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6KICoK4013964; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 11:12:50 -0700 Received: from mxe2.u.washington.edu (mxe2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6KICEfo111384 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 11:12:14 -0700 Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mxe2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6KICCqM027843 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 11:12:12 -0700 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6KICjRK004937 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 11:12:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay4.apple.com (relay4.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.12) with ESMTP id for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 11:12:11 -0700 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6KIC9Vd010352 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 11:12:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 11:12:09 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: wildcards in patterns? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I can't put wildcards in patterns, right? From the online help it doesn't look so. I'd love to be able to catch: http://*.org/ because it seems like the only spam I'm getting into my work account is ".org" porn spam. I tried adding just ".org" to an existing filter I've got but somehow it matched a whole bunch of messages (I picked one or two of them, and the w command couldn't see .org in the message). -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jul 20 11:30:58 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 11:30:58 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6KIUv8N018195; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 11:30:57 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6KIUuES021892 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 20 Jul 2004 11:30:57 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6KIUXiS015216; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 11:30:34 -0700 Received: from mxe2.u.washington.edu (mxe2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6KIUCfH068512 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 11:30:12 -0700 Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by mxe2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6KIU8oL000836 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 11:30:08 -0700 Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BmzNP-0000Ea-00 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 20:30:07 +0200 Received: from acbc60fc.ipt.aol.com ([172.188.96.252]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 20:30:07 +0200 Received: from nm-reverse-spam-filter by acbc60fc.ipt.aol.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 20:30:07 +0200 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 19:29:58 +0100 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Nancy McGough To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: wildcards in patterns? In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Sender: news X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: acbc60fc.ipt.aol.com X-Message-Flag: Worried about bugs & viruses? Switch to Mac/Unix/PC Pine - info @ www.ii.com X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XI, Probability=11%, Report='X_NJABL_DUL 1, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On 20 Jul 2004 Matt Ackeret (mattack@apple.com) wrote: > > I can't put wildcards in patterns, right? From the online help it doesn't > look so. > > I'd love to be able to catch: > > http://*.org/ No, you can't use wildcards in a Pine pattern but you could create Pine filter that uses an External Categorizer Commands and the external categorizer (e.g. grep) could use wild cards. To learn about External Categorizer Commands, go to MSRF and read the relevant help. I think this was introduced in 4.60. Hope this helps, Nancy Infinite Ink www.ii.com From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jul 20 11:44:04 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 11:44:04 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6KIi3rf018839; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 11:44:03 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6KIi0Q2012640 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 20 Jul 2004 11:44:01 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with SMTP id i6KIhlbL013310; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 11:43:47 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i6KIhGSc093502 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 11:43:16 -0700 Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i6KIhDxi012114 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 11:43:14 -0700 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6KIhlmR010551 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 11:43:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay3.apple.com (relay3.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.12) with ESMTP id for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 11:43:13 -0700 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6KIhBZ4014209 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 11:43:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 11:43:11 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Header bug in pine 4.61 In-Reply-To: <0407192050260.0@somehost.domainz.com> References: <0407191215080.5923068@somehost.domainz.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Mon, 19 Jul 2004, Erik Parker wrote: > Features like this shouldn't be turned on by default in an upgrade.. Just my > .02.. Should have it as a new option, so people who "bother" to read the > release notes, can enable it if they want to. I think you should've read the release notes, but I agree with this part. I think that feature changes for the most part shouldn't be pushed on people. Unless perhaps pine could figure out that someone doesn't have a lot of changes from the previous defaults, then maybe setting some currently-favored preferences would be reasonable. -- top-posting: It's just a bad idea. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jul 21 09:43:23 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 09:43:23 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6LGhM06030536; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 09:43:22 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6LGhL9q029092 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 21 Jul 2004 09:43:22 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6LGh6hh017026; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 09:43:07 -0700 Received: from mxe2.u.washington.edu (mxe2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6LGfxG4057572 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 09:41:59 -0700 Received: from www.provisio.net ([209.31.146.75]) by mxe2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6LGfv3G008780 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 09:41:58 -0700 Received: from www.provisio.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.provisio.net id i6LGfusY014716 envelope-from pine@coppit.org for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 12:41:56 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from pine@coppit.org) Received: from localhost (dcoppit@localhost) by www.provisio.net (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) with ESMTP id i6LGfpfK014713 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 12:41:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 12:41:51 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: David Coppit To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Tab completion of nicknames? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Authentication-Warning: www.provisio.net: dcoppit owned process doing -bs X-X-Sender: dcoppit@www.provisio.net X-Provisio-MailScanner-Information: Contact Paco Hope phone: 703-606-1905 X-Provisio-MailScanner: Judged to be clean X-MailScanner-From: pine@coppit.org X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, X_AUTH_WARNING 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Is there any way to have the tab key do completion in the message composition header like it does for filenames? David -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jul 21 10:22:03 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 10:22:03 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6LHM3Rh032499; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 10:22:03 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6LHM1np031048 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 21 Jul 2004 10:22:02 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6LHLn1N010834; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 10:21:49 -0700 Received: from mxe4.u.washington.edu (mxe4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6LHKr6K005316 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 10:20:53 -0700 Received: from tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net (tomts25.bellnexxia.net [209.226.175.188]) by mxe4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6LHKqT9027972 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 10:20:52 -0700 Received: from uder.int.thespigroup.com ([216.208.164.133]) by tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP id <20040721172046.ZMII28143.tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net@uder.int.thespigroup.com> for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 13:20:46 -0400 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 13:20:46 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Philip Bondi To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: body of message missing from default-fcc (PC-Pine 4.61) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-X-Sender: pjbondi@systemdatabase.homelinux.com X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello to all: When sending an e-mail it is written to the default-fcc. This copy of the message is missing the body of the message. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jul 21 13:37:46 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 13:37:46 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6LKbffd008148; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 13:37:41 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6LKbe6p006224 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 21 Jul 2004 13:37:40 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6LKbPpB014356; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 13:37:25 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6LKan7f066294 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 13:36:49 -0700 Received: from tx0.oucs.ox.ac.uk (tx0.oucs.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.163]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6LKamo9027485 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 13:36:48 -0700 Received: from scan0.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.1.162] helo=localhost) by tx0.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BnNpX-0005lM-Ep for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 21:36:47 +0100 Received: from rx0.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.1.161]) by localhost (scan0.oucs.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.162]) (amavisd-new, port 25) with ESMTP id 21639-07 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 21:36:47 +0100 (BST) Received: from smtp0.herald.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.0.246]) by rx0.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BnNpX-0005lJ-1Z for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 21:36:47 +0100 Received: from oucs-jamesc.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.15.217] helo=oucs-jamesc) by smtp0.herald.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BnNpX-0007wA-3y for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 21:36:47 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 21:36:47 +0100 (BST) Reply-To: James.Cummings@ota.ahds.ac.uk Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: James Cummings To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: attachments MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-X-Sender: jamesc@localhost X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Is there a way to select a set of attachments and save them? Someone sent me a file with a couple hundred attachments (instead of a single zip with them all in *Sigh*) I couldn't find a way to select all of them to save in a single command or select a subset of them to save. Was I just missing it somewhere (in pine 4.60)? -James --- Dr James Cummings, Oxford Text Archive, University of Oxford James dot Cummings at oucs dot ox dot ac dot uk -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jul 21 16:07:38 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 16:07:37 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6LN7ZaS014948 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 16:07:36 -0700 Received: from cdbnet.com.cn ([218.246.194.12]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6LN7UW5004856 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 16:07:33 -0700 Received: from cdbnet.com.cn([218.246.194.13]) by cdbnet.com.cn(AIMC 2.9.5.3) with SMTP id jm2840fefb39; Thr, 22 Jul 2004 06:36:42 +0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: X-AIMailer: AIMC 2.9.5.3 2001.06.25 X-AIMime: MIME/SMIME Lib 2.9 2.9 2001.06.25 Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 06:43:59 +0800 (CST) From: "xhsoft" To: yinyl@cn21.com.cn Cc: Subject: =?gb2312?b?16jDxcvRy/fC28yzoaK5qcfzsOWhorvh1LHVvrXjtefTysjtvP4=?= X-Priority: 3 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIIII, Probability=98%, Report='URI_CLASS_UNCLASSIFIED_DOMAIN 8, SUBJ_FULL_OF_8BITS 2.899, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADERS 1.154, PRIORITY_NO_NAME 0.716, CHARSET_FARAWAY 0.536, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY 0.409, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, NO_REAL_NAME 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HIGHBITS 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __CT 0, __MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY 0, __CTE 0, __MIME_VERSION 0' Õ¾³¤£¬ÄúºÃ£¡°ï°ïæ·¢²¼ÏÂÃæµÄÈí¼þ£¬Ð»Ð»£¡ Èí¼þÃû³Æ£ºÂÛ̳µçÓÊËÑË÷[BbsMailScan] Èí¼þ´óС£º358KB Èí¼þÓïÑÔ£º¼òÌåÖÐÎÄ Ó¦ÓÃƽ̨£ºWin9x/Me/NT/2000/XP Ãâ·ÑÏÂÔØ£ºhttp://bbsmailscan.k900.com Ãâ·ÑÏÂÔØ£ºhttp://bbsmailscan.666d.com Ãâ·ÑÏÂÔØ£ºhttp://yxsoft369.k900.com Ãâ·ÑÏÂÔØ£ºhttp://yxsoft369.cnnb.net QQÁªÏµ£º114075303 µç»°£º0519-8670323 Ïêϸ½éÉÜ£º ¡¡ רҵËÑË÷¸÷ÀàÂÛ̳¡¢¹©ÇóÐÅÏ¢°å¡¢»ÆÒ³Êý¾Ý ¿â¡¢»áÔ±Õ¾µãÉϹ«²¼µÄÓʼþµØÖ·¹¤¾ß¡£ÔËÐÐ ³ÌÐòºóÏȸù¾ÝÂÛ̳վµãµÄÒ³ÃæÊý¾Ý¹æÂÉÉú³É ´ýËÑË÷µÄÍøÕ¾Ò³ÃæµØÖ·ÁÐ±í£¬È»ºóµ¼Èë¸ÃÁÐ ±íºóËÑË÷¼´¿É¡£¸ù¾ÝÍøÕ¾·ÃÎÊËٶȿìÂýµ÷½Ú ËÑË÷¼ä¸ôʱ¼ä£¬Èí¼þ×Ô¶¯´ò¿ªÍøÕ¾Ò³ÃæÌáÈ¡ ÓʼþµØÖ·£¬×Ô¶¯È¥µôÖظ´¡£Èí¼þ¿ÉÒÔËÑË÷ASP/PHP/CGI µÈ¸÷ÖÖÐÎʽµÄÍøÒ³£¬°üÀ¨ÄÇЩÐèÒª½øÐÐCOOKIS ÑéÖ¤µÇ½µÄÕ¾µã£¬¶¼¿ÉÇáËɵؿìËÙËѼ¯µ½´ó Á¿µÄÄ¿±ê¿Í»§ÓʼþµØÖ·¡£ ----------------------------------------------»¶Ó­Ê¹Óóɶ¼ÐÅÏ¢¸Ûµç×ÓÓʼþϵͳ http://mail.cdbnet.com.cn From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Jul 22 13:09:24 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 13:09:24 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6MK9NcE026776; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 13:09:23 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6MK9MlO031726 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 22 Jul 2004 13:09:22 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6MK91fl016704; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 13:09:02 -0700 Received: from mxu8.u.washington.edu (mxu8.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.142]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6MK80hH026054 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 13:08:00 -0700 Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1]) by mxu8.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6MK801c021962 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 13:08:00 -0700 Received: from zeno1.math.washington.edu (IDENT:62viW0CLlSV7cPcEK5VV9/BU7n97yvED@zeno1.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.4]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i6MK7qLb016820; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 13:07:53 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 13:07:52 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: attachments In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: James Cummings X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.6; VAE 6.26.0.10; VDF 6.26.0.38 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** James Cummings (abcJames.Cummings@ota.ahds.ac.uk.edo) wrote in the...: :) Is there a way to select a set of attachments and save them? Not really. The best you can do in Pine4.61 is to save all attachments at once. This is done as part of the export command. In fact, if you have a message that has attachments, then pressing "E" to export it, will show a key in the menu "^P", which when pressed will make Pine save all attachments included in the message in one directory. The name of the directory is obtained from the name of the file where you will export your message by adding a ".d" suffix. -- Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jul 23 00:52:43 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 00:52:43 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6N7qfmu018423; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 00:52:41 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6N7qed5021720 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 23 Jul 2004 00:52:41 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6N7qAAm011394; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 00:52:11 -0700 Received: from mxe4.u.washington.edu (mxe4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6N7p6Rp075492 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 00:51:06 -0700 Received: from pulstar.albedo.art.pl (pulstar.man.szczecin.pl [212.14.1.78]) by mxe4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6N7p4Kn009717 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 00:51:05 -0700 Received: from pulstar.man.szczecin.pl (pulstar.man.szczecin.pl [212.14.1.78]) by pulstar.albedo.art.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6AD335C4F for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 09:51:02 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 09:51:02 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Murphy To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Keywords doesn't seems to work - Pine 4.61 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: murphy@pulstar.man.szczecin.pl X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_LONG_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello, I try to make some usage of the "keywords" in the Pine 4.61 on NetBSD 2.0F, but this does not working. :( I set the keyword in the setup screen like this: keywords = S then I try to mark some message using this keyword, but the only thing which is happening is the message: Cannot add keywords for this folder I try to do this for a different folders and still the same result. Can somebody tell me what is wrong with this keywords? Regards, Murphy -- _||_ _||_ -------------------------------------------------------- ||\ /|| e-mail: murphy@pulstar.albedo.art.pl GG 107745 || || Everything is possible - this is only a question of time \/564\/ -------------------------------------------------------- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jul 23 02:45:27 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 02:45:27 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6N9jLoq023203; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 02:45:21 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6N9jKA4008542 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 23 Jul 2004 02:45:20 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6N9j5kB015248; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 02:45:05 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6N9iHjh109570 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 02:44:17 -0700 Received: from nathan.nehmer.net (nathan.nehmer.net [80.190.241.28]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6N9iF10030573 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 02:44:16 -0700 Received: from localhost (softdnserr [::ffff:127.0.0.1]) (IDENT: torben) by nathan.nehmer.net with esmtp; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 11:44:15 +0200 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 11:44:12 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: torben@nehmer.net To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Disabling CRAM-MD5 authenticator for a remote pinerc Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, __SANE_MSGID 0, NO_REAL_NAME 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __NEW_DOMAIN_EXTENSIONS_2 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I have a problem regarding PINE's attempt to automatically use CRAM-MD5 when the server advertises it: My own mailserver has a few accounts, which do not support CRAM-MD5 among a majority of other ones (basically all shell accounts). I have decided to keep the CRAM-MD5 in the capabilities of the IMAP server, as more then 95% of the users can use it, and the remaining 5% are all people that can deal with the situation, such as me ;-). Regarding Pine, (tested with 4.58), the disable-these-authenticators directive in the .pinerc works fine in general. I run into troubles while using a remote pinerc with the -p command line switch. Of course, the disable... config directive in my local .pinerc is now ommited, so I have tried adding the same directive at the commandline (using - -disable-these-authenticators=CRAM-MD5) and into the systemwide pinerc (using the line "disable-these-authenticators=CRAM-MD5"). Neither of the two actually did change the behavoir of PINE when trying to load the remote configuration. Here are the parts that seem to be interesting from a -d 7 log file: - ---cut--- Global config: /usr/local/lib/pine.conf Personal config: {localhost/user=torben}INBOX.internal.pine.remote_pinerc ... reading_pinerc "/usr/local/lib/pine.conf" Read 911 characters: disable-these-authen : CRAM-MD5 user-domain : nehmer.net smtp-server : localhost character-set : ISO-8859-15 rsh-open-timeout : 0 ssh-open-timeout : 0 ... pine_mail_open: opening "{localhost/user=torben}INBOX.internal.pine.remote_pinerc" (stream was NULL) flag=0x0 same_stream: {localhost/user=torben}INBOX.internal.pine.remote_pinerc == NULL same_stream: no dice IMAP 11:33:25 7/23 mm_log babble: Trying IP address [127.0.0.1] IMAP 11:33:30 7/23 mm_log warning: Retrying CRAM-MD5 authentication after Login failed. === optionally_enter called === IMAP 11:33:38 7/23 mm_log warning: Retrying CRAM-MD5 authentication after Login failed. === optionally_enter called === IMAP 11:33:52 7/23 mm_log error: Can not authenticate to IMAP server: Login failed. IMAP 11:33:52 7/23 mm_notify bye: {localhost/user=torben}INBOX.internal.pine.remote_pinerc (?) : Courier-IMAP server shutting down - ---cut--- I can verify this behavoir both with 4.58 and 4.61. Are there any other ways of getting this working? Perhaps a hidden command to influence the authenticator used per-server? It seems like a bug to me, that the global configuration is ignored at this point. Or did I miss something really trivial ? Live long and prosper! Torben Nehmer - -- Torben Nehmer, Guenzburg, Bavaria, Germany http://www.nathan-syntronics.de, mailto:torben@nehmer.net PGP Public Key: https://www.link-m.de/pgp/t.nehmer.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76 iD8DBQFBAN3uJPh4Kn6d5FYRAl0dAKDkKmCGX+4I81tcv+yKJ/dNGPgDfgCgq4Pw 2Dqh2lYzdLdkMdEAgzKt8YY= =ksZ6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jul 23 11:16:49 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 11:16:49 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6NIGmNu008946 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 11:16:49 -0700 Received: from postfix1.terra.com (postfix1.terra.com [66.119.66.192]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6NIGk73024139 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 11:16:48 -0700 Received: from mailbox3.terra.com (mbl1.us.midnet [10.20.0.192]) by postfix1.terra.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8831411BAC; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:16:23 -0400 (EDT) From: mike_asieke3 Message-ID: <290f2728e402.28e402290f27@mailbox3.terra.com> X-Mailer: Netscape Webmail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Language: es Subject: DEAR FRIENDTRY AND CALL ME +229 94 31 55. X-Accept-Language: es Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:16:23 -0400 (EDT) To: undisclosed-recipients:; X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXII, Probability=92%, Report='UNDISC_RECIPS 2.399, FROM_HAS_ULINE_NUMS 1.598, NIGERIAN_BODY2 1.442, NIGERIAN_BODY1 1.296, RISK_FREE 1.278, MILLION_USD 1.204, LINES_OF_YELLING_3 0.671, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, LINES_OF_YELLING_2 0.001, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS 0.001, __CT 0, __CD 0, __CTE 0, __TO_MALFORMED_3 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_45 0, __FROM_HAS_UNDERLINE_NUMS 0, __NEW_DOMAIN_EXTENSIONS_2 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_26 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_20 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, X_ACCEPT_LANG 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0' FROM DR.MIKE ASIEKE DIRECTOR INCHARGE OF AUDITING AND ACCOUNTING UNIT, CONTINENTAL TRUST BANK, COTONOU-BENIN REPUBLIC ATTN: MY FRIEND Pleasure writing to you at this moment of the day, I am DR.MIKE ASIEKE, the director incharge of auditing and accounting Unit of Continental Trust Bank in Cotonou-Benin Republic. I and my colleagues deem it fit to contact you regarding to a transaction that will favour both of us at the end, and i got your contact in my search for a reputable and reliable person to help me claim the fund in question. We discovered the sum of eight million one hundred thousand United States Dollars (USD8.1M) belonging to a deceased customer of this bank. The fund has been lying in a suspence account without anybody coming to put claim over the money since the account owner late Mr. Mohamed Mohd from libanon, who was involved in the December 25th Benin plane crash. Here is the air crash website= http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/africa/12/26/benin.crash/index.html The said fund is now ready for transfer to a foriegn account whose owner will be portrayed as the beneficiary and next of kin to the deceased customer of the bank. The foriegn account owner will impost himself as the next of kin to the deceased and respond positively like a true next of kin who wishes to speed up the release and transfer of his inherited fund. If the over due fund if not claimed by the end of next quarter, the government of the Federal Republic of Benin will take over the ownership of the fund in line with the Federal Edict Act of 1979. We do not want the government to take over the ownership of this money, that is why I contacted you for us to do the deal together, so that we will portray you as the bonafide next of kin to the deceased whose name is Mr. Mohamed mohd. If you accept to carry out this project with us, we will offer you 30% of the total sum, while I and my colleagues involved will take 70% of the total sum.Upon your acceptance to do this deal with us, we will jointly effect the transfer within eight working days. Be rest assured that, this transaction carries no risk and no extra responssibilities on your part, except the above mentioned roles and normally you will be required to maintain absolute information and absolute secrecy throughout the duration of this transaction, because discussing it with a third party might jeopardise the entire transaction. I am looking forward to receiving your interesting response on this project as this will greatly enrich the both of us at the end. please You may contact me throughmy private email: or phone mike_asieke1@yahoo.co.uk BEST REGARDS, DR MIKE ASIEKE mike_asieke1@yahoo.co.uk +229 94 31 55 ___________________________________________________________________ Consigue tu e-mail gratuito CORREO.TERRA.COM.GT Haz click en http://www.terra.com.gt/correo/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jul 23 12:21:49 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 12:21:49 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6NJLmG6012196; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 12:21:48 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6NJLlFa026889 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 23 Jul 2004 12:21:47 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6NJLW3U016348; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 12:21:32 -0700 Received: from mxe4.u.washington.edu (mxe4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6NJKgNS005326 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 12:20:42 -0700 Received: from tx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk (tx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.163]) by mxe4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6NJKfUX030671 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 12:20:41 -0700 Received: from scan2.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.162] helo=localhost) by tx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Bo5ay-0005cx-Kh for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 20:20:40 +0100 Received: from rx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.161]) by localhost (scan2.oucs.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.162]) (amavisd-new, port 25) with ESMTP id 21384-06 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 20:20:40 +0100 (BST) Received: from smtp2.herald.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.0.235]) by rx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Bo5ay-0005cr-7M for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 20:20:40 +0100 Received: from oucs-jamesc.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.15.217] helo=oucs-jamesc) by smtp2.herald.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1Bo5ay-0002H3-3n for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 20:20:40 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 20:20:40 +0100 (BST) Reply-To: James.Cummings@ota.ahds.ox.ac.uk Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: James Cummings To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: charsets (4.61) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-X-Sender: jamesc@localhost X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hiya, I remember this being discussed earlier but didn't find an easy solution. In 4.61 under debian linux with a system character set of UTF-8. Many messages are received fine, but I get a lot that are windows-1252, iso-8859-1, etc. The side effects I'm experiencing are that some messages converted internally by pine lose things like apostrophes. If I have pass-control-characters-as-is and the c1 checked, then they render like ~R etc. Also when I forward a message in another character set some users then have problems. Suggestions? -James --- Dr James Cummings, Oxford Text Archive, University of Oxford James dot Cummings at oucs dot ox dot ac dot uk -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jul 23 12:33:22 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 12:33:22 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6NJXMxs012631 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 12:33:22 -0700 Received: from netscape.net ([202.97.150.150]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6NJXIUZ027244 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 12:33:20 -0700 Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 12:33:18 -0700 Message-Id: <200407231933.i6NJXIUZ027244@mx2.cac.washington.edu> From: rosekhob@netscape.net To: pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu Subject: CRY FOR HELP X-Priority: 3 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIII, Probability=96%, Report='DCC_BULK_HIGH 3.5, NIGERIAN_BODY3 2.900, NIGERIAN_BODY2 1.442, NIGERIAN_BODY1 1.296, MILLION_USD 1.204, PRIORITY_NO_NAME 0.716, DEAR_FRIEND 0.363, SUPERLONG_LINE 0.003, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS 0.001, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, __NIGERIAN_BODY_46 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_20 0, NO_REAL_NAME 0.000, __DCC_BODY_MANY 0, __DCC_FUZ1_MANY 0, __DCC_FUZ2_10 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, DATE_MISSING 0.000, __NIGERIAN_BODY_7 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_26 0' Dear Friend, This business proposal to you is strictly Confidential, with due respect. Sorry at this perceived confusion or stress you may have by receiving this letter from me, Since we have not known ourselves or met previously. Despite that, I am constrained to write you this letter because of the urgency involved. I am Mrs. Rose Khobe, the wife of late Gen.Maxwell Khobe former ECOMOG [West African Peace-Keeping Force] Commander who died in the Sierra Leone civil Disturbances[War]. My three Children and I are trapped in obnoxious custom traditional rites. We have Suffered maltreatment and untold hardship in the Hands of my late husbands family, simply because I did not Bear a male child for my late husband by tradition, All that my husband had,[wealth] belongs to his Brothers/family, while myself has to be married by his Immediate younger brother. They have taken all that I suffered with my husband to acquire including Treasure, Houses whereby, his bank accounts were closed by his family members. I wanted to escape to the United State of America [USA} with my children on exile, but again they conspired and stole my international passport and other traveling documents to further frustrate me. Thank God, two weeks ago, I received Key Text Code [KTC} from SECURITIES COMPANY, that my husband deposited U.S $15 Million [Fifteen Million United States Dollars] cash with this company. It has therefore, become very necessary and urgent to contact someone, from a foreign country like you to help me receive/secure these funds overseas also to help and invest it on our behalf as well, while we find a way of getting out to meet with you in your country. These funds are kept on a CODE with the Securities Company to avoid detection, seizure or a diversion I have had several telephone discussions with the Assistant Director of the Securities company who has express willingness to help me on meeting the company’s demand. This is why I have contacted you to help save my children and, receive these funds on our behalf. But, you would need to give me sufficient assurance that if you help me out, you would not divert the funds. My children and I have resolved to give you 20% of the total sum. This is all my children and I have got to live on. Please, I have reposed my confidence in you and hope you will not disappoint me. I will forward to you the contact particulars of the assistant director so that you can contact him and ask the possibility of receiving this fund on our behalf as the sole beneficiary, I look forward to your response. Best Regards, Mrs. Rose Khobe. NB: Please response to this email address :- rosekhobe@netscape.net From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jul 23 13:54:34 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 13:54:34 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6NKsSs0016163; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 13:54:28 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6NKsQvo029835 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 23 Jul 2004 13:54:27 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6NKs9nq015714; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 13:54:09 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6NKrHWT059064 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 13:53:17 -0700 Received: from mail3.panix.com (mail3.panix.com [166.84.1.74]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6NKrG0O004873 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 13:53:17 -0700 Received: from mailspool2.panix.com (mailspool2.panix.com [166.84.1.79]) by mail3.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FAC1981A9 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 16:53:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.167.41] (unknown [216.31.167.125]) by mailspool2.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87BE04D5C3 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 16:53:16 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 13:53:12 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Kenneth Crudup To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: charsets (4.61) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: kenny@Dell8K.localdomain X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __C230066_P5 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, James Cummings wrote: > The side effects I'm experiencing are that some messages > converted internally by pine lose things like apostrophes. Real apostrophes, or those stupid Windows ones? -Kenny -- Kenneth R. Crudup Sr. SW Engineer, Scott County Consulting, Los Angeles H: 3630 S. Sepulveda Blvd. #138, L.A., CA 90034-6809 (888) 454-8181 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jul 23 14:37:15 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:37:15 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6NLbEUW018149; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:37:14 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6NLbDkK016751 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:37:14 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6NLb13H008438; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:37:01 -0700 Received: from mxe1.u.washington.edu (mxe1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.136]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6NLaRUF091872 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:36:27 -0700 Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mxe1.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6NLaRbR019343 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:36:27 -0700 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6NLbj7D019767 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:37:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay1.apple.com (relay1.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.12) with ESMTP id for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:36:26 -0700 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay1.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6NLaOa3027997 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:36:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:36:22 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: charsets (4.61) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, Kenneth Crudup wrote: >On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, James Cummings wrote: > >> The side effects I'm experiencing are that some messages >> converted internally by pine lose things like apostrophes. > >Real apostrophes, or those stupid Windows ones? Blaming this on Windows isn't correct. I'm basically positive he's referring to "smart quotes" aka "curly quotes" which aren't in the regular ASCII set.. They turn into Rs and Ss, for example. I hate 'em too, but they're becoming more prevalent. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jul 23 14:42:38 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:42:38 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6NLgcxu018399; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:42:38 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6NLgbfB031677 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:42:37 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6NLgL8g017048; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:42:21 -0700 Received: from mxe1.u.washington.edu (mxe1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.136]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6NLg2p8109754 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:42:03 -0700 Received: from mail3.panix.com (mail3.panix.com [166.84.1.74]) by mxe1.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6NLg205020902 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:42:02 -0700 Received: from mailspool3.panix.com (mailspool3.panix.com [166.84.1.78]) by mail3.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 881A798273 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 17:42:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.167.41] (unknown [216.31.167.125]) by mailspool3.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5576A2616EA for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 17:42:01 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:41:59 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Kenneth Crudup To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: charsets (4.61) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: kenny@Dell8K.localdomain X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __C230066_P5 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, Matt Ackeret wrote: > Blaming this on Windows isn't correct. > I'm basically positive he's referring to "smart quotes" aka "curly quotes" > which aren't in the regular ASCII set.. They turn into Rs and Ss, for example. Blaming this on Windows is entirely correct- instead of making those be high-byte or Unicode characters, MS co-opted plain-vanilla control characters (you're actually seeing "Ctrl-R" and "Ctrl-T" (or the like)) for their "smart" apostrophes. -Kenny -- Kenneth R. Crudup Sr. SW Engineer, Scott County Consulting, Los Angeles H: 3630 S. Sepulveda Blvd. #138, L.A., CA 90034-6809 (888) 454-8181 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jul 23 14:51:08 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:51:08 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6NLp8eR018807; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:51:08 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6NLp6ha031945 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:51:07 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6NLosaG010796; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:50:54 -0700 Received: from mxe4.u.washington.edu (mxe4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6NLoVer059024 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:50:31 -0700 Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mxe4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6NLoV0C006575 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:50:31 -0700 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6NLpnfZ022024 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:51:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay3.apple.com (relay3.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.12) with ESMTP id for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:50:30 -0700 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6NLoSGg016749 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:50:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:50:27 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: charsets (4.61) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, Kenneth Crudup wrote: >On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, Matt Ackeret wrote: > >> Blaming this on Windows isn't correct. >> I'm basically positive he's referring to "smart quotes" aka "curly quotes" >> which aren't in the regular ASCII set.. They turn into Rs and Ss, for example. > >Blaming this on Windows is entirely correct- instead of making those be >high-byte or Unicode characters, MS co-opted plain-vanilla control >characters (you're actually seeing "Ctrl-R" and "Ctrl-T" (or the like)) >for their "smart" apostrophes. Then you're talking about something completely different. Smart quotes I'm talking about (and typed with option keys on Macs for example) have the high bit set, and when *stripping* the high bit, you end up seeing Rs and Ss.. and I think these smart quotes were on the Mac before Windows, that was kind of my implication about "blame". From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jul 23 20:39:00 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 20:39:00 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6O3cxT5029053 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 20:39:00 -0700 Received: from 2mails1922.com ([192.116.71.228]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6O3chmm009270 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 20:38:45 -0700 Message-Id: <200407240338.i6O3chmm009270@mx2.cac.washington.edu> From: "lee tsong" Reply-To: lee_tsong@tiscali.it To: pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 04:39:25 +0100 Subject: urgent X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6900 DM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXX, Probability=80%, Report='RATWARE_OE_MALFORMED 2.900, NIGERIAN_BODY2 1.442, NIGERIAN_BODY1 1.296, MILLION_USD 1.204, DCC_BULK_MEDIUM 1, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, NIGERIAN_SUBJECT1 0.000, __OUTLOOK_MUA_1 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_7 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_26 0, __NEW_DOMAIN_EXTENSIONS_2 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_45 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY_10 0, __DCC_FUZ1_100 0, __DCC_FUZ2_100 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, __CTE 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0' LEE TSONG #117-1=2C Min Sheng E=2E Road=2E Sec=2E 3=2C Taipei=2C Taiwan Attn=3A Dear Friend=2C I wish my proposal would not come to you as a surprise=2E I am LEE TSONG=2C I work as you would have seen with CITICORP=2C although this being a brief introduction=2E Anyway=2C we had a foreign client =28Mohamed Mohd Salaheldin=29 who deposited a huge sum of amount=2C US$28=2E5million =28Twenty Eight Million Five Hundred Thousand United States Dollars=29 with our bank=2E Unfortunately=2C this client was among the victims of EGYPTAIR FLIGHT NO=2E990 that crashed on the 31-10-1999 in U=2ES=2EA=2E Confirmable from the below website www=2Ecnn=2Ecom=2Fus=2F9911=2F02=2Fegyptair990=2Elist=2Findex=2Ehtml http=3A=2F=2Fwww=2Ecnn=2Ecom=2Fus=2F9911=2F02=2Fegyptair990=2Elist=2Findex=2Ehtml or www=2Egreatdreams=2Ecom=2Fplane990=2Ehtm but=2C since then we have not had anybody to come for the claims as the next of kin=2E A situation I have monitored closely with my position in the bank=2E Now=2C having monitored this deposit and managed it over the years before his death=2C and hence nobody has showed up as the next of kin for the past two years plus=2C I have removed the file to my =22private vault=22=2E I now solicit for your assistance to present you as the next of kin as every other arrangement has being concluded by me and I am only waiting for a foreigner to enable me move the funds to his account=2E This does not have any risk attached to it as all the internal documentations would be handled by me and every loop holes sealed off=2E I therefore request you to confirm your interest by a return message and I will furnish you with the full details and what to do concerning this deal=2E What you stand to gain would be discussed and it is negotiable before the deal commences=2E NOTE=3A PLEASE KINDLY SEND YOUR REPLY TO THE ADDRESS BELOW leetsong=5F2000=40yahoo=2Eco=2Euk Believing to hear from you soonest=2E Kind regards=2C LEE TSONG =2E From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sat Jul 24 03:18:33 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 03:18:32 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6OAIRZx007661; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 03:18:27 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6OAIQk5005443 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 24 Jul 2004 03:18:26 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6OAI676016180; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 03:18:06 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6OAGb1a103910 for ; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 03:16:37 -0700 Received: from tx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk (tx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.163]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6OAGaiu015544 for ; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 03:16:37 -0700 Received: from scan2.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.162] helo=localhost) by tx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BoJa0-0004dD-JW for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 11:16:36 +0100 Received: from rx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.161]) by localhost (scan2.oucs.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.162]) (amavisd-new, port 25) with ESMTP id 17346-05 for ; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 11:16:35 +0100 (BST) Received: from smtp0.herald.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.0.246]) by rx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BoJZz-0004d9-9O for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 11:16:35 +0100 Received: from oucs-jamesc.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.15.217] helo=oucs-jamesc) by smtp0.herald.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BoJZz-0002h8-3y for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 11:16:35 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 11:16:35 +0100 (BST) Reply-To: James.Cummings@ota.ahds.ac.uk Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: James.Cummings@ota.ahds.ac.uk To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: charsets (4.61) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: jamesc@localhost X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, NO_REAL_NAME 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, Matt Ackeret wrote: > On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, Kenneth Crudup wrote: > >On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, Matt Ackeret wrote: > > > >> Blaming this on Windows isn't correct. > >> I'm basically positive he's referring to "smart quotes" aka "curly quotes" > >> which aren't in the regular ASCII set.. They turn into Rs and Ss, for example. > > > >Blaming this on Windows is entirely correct- instead of making those be > >high-byte or Unicode characters, MS co-opted plain-vanilla control > >characters (you're actually seeing "Ctrl-R" and "Ctrl-T" (or the like)) > >for their "smart" apostrophes. > > Then you're talking about something completely different. > > Smart quotes I'm talking about (and typed with option keys on Macs for example) > have the high bit set, and when *stripping* the high bit, you end up seeing > Rs and Ss.. and I think these smart quotes were on the Mac before Windows, > that was kind of my implication about "blame". Whatever fault-laying exercises might be undertaken, yes, I think they are probably windows smart quotes from windows code pages in this instance. I'd just like to be able to read the email with all the characters the user sent. But because I read from all sorts of different ssh connections, pine is great for me and I don't want to switch. (Hrmmm does mutt have this problem?) So, rather than laying blame, is there a way for me to stop this? I usually read from a debian linux machine that is my desktop machine, so I can install extra locales if that helps (but doesn't seem to have), or anything else needed. Or is it a problem that can't be solved? -James --- Dr James Cummings, Oxford Text Archive, University of Oxford James dot Cummings at oucs dot ox dot ac dot uk From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sat Jul 24 09:41:59 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 09:41:59 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6OGfwQ6018016; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 09:41:58 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6OGfv5B014414 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 24 Jul 2004 09:41:58 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6OGfi9t017248; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 09:41:44 -0700 Received: from mxu9.u.washington.edu (mxu9.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.174]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6OGemgb103866 for ; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 09:40:48 -0700 Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by mxu9.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6OGemAF003222 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=FAIL) for ; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 09:40:48 -0700 Received: from mycomputer (OL26-35.fibertel.com.ar [24.232.35.26]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6OGeLQc014370 for ; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 09:40:24 -0700 Message-Id: <200407241640.i6OGeLQc014370@mx1.cac.washington.edu> Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 16:36:42 GMT Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: owner-pine-info@cac.washington.edu To: Pine Discussion Forum Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: pine-info@cac.washington.edu X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXX, Probability=50%, Report='NIGERIAN_BODY2 1.442, NIGERIAN_BODY1 1.296, MILLION_USD 1.204, US_DOLLARS_3 1.100, SUPERLONG_LINE 0.003, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __SUBJ_MISSING 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_15 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_20 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_26 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, NO_REAL_NAME 0.000, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, SUBJ_MISSING 0.000' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Dr. Arthur M. PetroSA Pretoria. I am the Director in charge of Overseas investments in The Petroleum Oil and Gas Corporation of South Africa (PetroSA).We have been trying to pay the heirs of one A. ADAMS, a citizen of the United States of America who has huge shares in our company for over Sixty years.This investment has been on since the apartheid regime. During the last management meetings of our Corporation we realized that the monetary shares equivalent of the presumed deceased person is up to ($40,000,000.00) Million USD. All attempts to locate the heirs of the above named person is abortive since he didn't state any next of kin in his shares' certificate. If you can stand as the heir, we have all the paperwork in place to tranfer all the money to your designated account; but you shall only be entitled to 30% of the total amount, we keep 60% and 10% will be used towards offsetting any cost. If you are interested, send us an email to enable us work out modalities to make this transfer possible. Best Regards, Dr. Athur M. Dr. Arthur M. PetroSA Pretoria. I am the Director in charge of Overseas investments in The Petroleum Oil and Gas Corporation of South Africa (PetroSA).We have been trying to pay the heirs of one A. ADAMS, a citizen of the United States of America who has huge shares in our company for over Sixty years.This investment has been on since the apartheid regime. During the last management meetings of our Corporation we realized that the monetary shares equivalent of the presumed deceased person is up to ($40,000,000.00) Million USD. All attempts to locate the heirs of the above named person is abortive since he didn't state any next of kin in his shares' certificate. If you can stand as the heir, we have all the paperwork in place to tranfer all the money to your designated account; but you shall only be entitled to 30% of the total amount, we keep 60% and 10% will be used towards offsetting any cost. If you are interested, send us an email to enable us work out modalities to make this transfer possible. Best Regards, Dr. Athur M. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sat Jul 24 13:04:52 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 13:04:52 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6OK4qrf023128 for ; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 13:04:52 -0700 Received: from web25105.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (web25105.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.10.53]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6OK4o6I032235 for ; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 13:04:51 -0700 Message-ID: <20040724200450.86482.qmail@web25105.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Received: from [213.136.114.81] by web25105.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 22:04:50 CEST Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 22:04:50 +0200 (CEST) From: =?iso-8859-1?q?queen=20solomon?= Subject: BUSINESS ASSISTANCE To: queen_solomon1@yahoo.fr MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-462893877-1090699490=:85996" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXIIIIII, Probability=36%, Report='FROM_HAS_ULINE_NUMS 1.598, MILLION_USD 1.204, US_DOLLARS_3 1.100, SUPERLONG_LINE 0.003, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS 0.001, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __CTE 0, __MSGID_BEFORE_RECEIVED 0, __MSGID_BEFORE_OKAY 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, OUR_COMPENSATION 0.000, __NIGERIAN_BODY_20 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __RATWARE_SIGNATURE_3_N1 0, __FROM_HAS_UNDERLINE_NUMS 0' --0-462893877-1090699490=:85996 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From Queen Solomon. Abidjan Cote d'Ivoire West Africa Date BUSINESS ASSISTANCE. Dearest, Permit me to inform you of my desire of going in to business relationship with you, for brief introduction. I am Mrs QUEEN SOLOMON the wife of late Mrs. HASAN SOLOMON. My husband was a very wealthy cocoa and Gold merchant in Abidjan , the economic capital of Ivory coast, my husband was poissoned to death by his business associates on one of their outings on a business trip.Before my husband died on November 2000 in a private hospital here in Abidjan, he secretly called me on his sick bed side and told me that he left a trunk box that contained the sum of seven million five hundred thousand United State Dollars. USD ($7.500,000) left in a private security company as a family a effect not as money for security reasons here in Abidjan here Now because of the political crisis in Ivory Coast last two years 23rd October 2000 during the president Robert Guei regime on the presidential election which was won by President Laurent Gbagbo after all it became a massaccar between the two parties RDR and FPI because of the discrimination between the two parties, so for the security of this fund I instructed the security company to move the fund to their branch office in Europe . My husband also told me that he used my son's name as his only son for the next of Kin in depositing of the box.He also explained to me that it was because of this wealth that he was poissoned by his business associates. That I should seek for a foreign partner in a country of my choice where I will transfer this money and use it for investment purpose such as real estate management or hotel management . Sir, I am honourably seeking your assistance in transferring of this money to your nominated account oversea. As soon as this money is out from the security company in Europe, So I want you to assist me in this following ways. (1)you shall make arrangement for me to come over to your country for the investment of this money. (2)you shall serve as a guardian of this fund since I am woman, moreover, Sir I am willing to offer you 15% of the total sum as your compensation for your effort input after the succesful transfer of this fund in your nominated account oversea. Further more, you indicate your option towords assisting me. Contact me through the above email address as I believe that this transaction would concluded within fourteen (14) days you signify interest to assist me. Anticipating to hear from you soonest. Thanks and God bless . Best regards. Mrs Queen solomon. --------------------------------- Le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger est arrivé ! Découvrez toutes les nouveautés pour dialoguer instantanément avec vos amis.Téléchargez GRATUITEMENT ici ! --0-462893877-1090699490=:85996 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

From Queen Solomon.
Abidjan Cote d'Ivoire
West Africa
Date                      BUSINESS ASSISTANCE.  
Dearest, Permit me to inform you of my desire of going in to business relationship with you, for brief introduction.
I am Mrs QUEEN SOLOMON  the wife of late Mrs. HASAN SOLOMON. My husband was a very wealthy cocoa and Gold merchant in Abidjan , the economic capital of Ivory coast, my husband was poissoned to death by his business associates on one of their outings on a business trip.Before my husband died on November 2000 in a private hospital here in Abidjan, he secretly called me on his sick bed side and told me that he  left a trunk box that contained the sum of seven million five hundred thousand United State Dollars. USD ($7.500,000) left in a private security company as a family a effect not as money for security reasons he! re in Abidjan here
Now because of the political crisis in Ivory Coast last two years 23rd October 2000 during the president Robert Guei regime on the presidential election which was won by President Laurent Gbagbo after all it became a massaccar between the two parties RDR and FPI because of the discrimination between the two parties, so for the security of this fund I instructed the security company to move the fund to their branch office in Europe .
 My husband also told me that he used my son's name as his only son for the next of Kin in depositing of the box.He also explained to me that it was because of this wealth that he was poissoned by his business associates. That I should seek for a foreign partner in a country of my choice where I will transfer this money and use it for investment purpose such as real estate management or hotel management .
Sir, I am honourably seeking your assistance in transferring of this money to your nominated account oversea. As ! soon as this money is out from the security company in Europe, So I want you to assist me in this  following ways. 
(1)you shall make arrangement for me to come over to your country for the investment of this money.
(2)you shall serve as a guardian of this fund since I am woman, moreover,
Sir I am willing to offer you 15% of the total sum as your compensation for your effort input after the succesful transfer of this fund in your nominated  account oversea.
Further more, you indicate your option towords assisting me. Contact me through the above email address as I believe that this transaction would concluded within fourteen 
(14) days you signify interest to assist me. Anticipating to hear from you soonest.
Thanks and God bless .
Best regards.
Mrs Queen solomon.

 


Le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger est arrivé ! Découvrez toutes les nouveautés pour dialoguer instantanément avec vos amis. Téléchargez GRATUITEMENT ici ! --0-462893877-1090699490=:85996-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun Jul 25 00:23:51 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 00:23:51 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6P7Np7N007853; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 00:23:51 -0700 Received: from 140.142.32.140 ([221.150.50.44]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6P7NOQc003716; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 00:23:44 -0700 Message-Id: <200407250723.i6P7NOQc003716@mx1.cac.washington.edu> Received: from disjunct1astronautmarketwise (36.39.905.91) by mail0.221.150.50.44 (barnyarddonate QFYUA 0.3.961) id 69W5TPZ59841RR965 for davep@cac.washington.edu; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 11:15:01 +0400 X-MIME-Autoconverted: Yes Disclose-Recipients: No Discarded-X400-MTS-Extensions: Yes Alternate-Recipient: Allowed X-No-Archive: Yes Reply-To: "Earle.Henley@bresnan.net" From: "Earle.Henley@bresnan.net" To: davep@cac.washington.edu Cc: bmar@cac.washington.edu, owner-pine-info@cac.washington.edu, plibbey@cac.washington.edu, majordomo@cac.washington.edu, pine-admin@cac.washington.edu, noc@cac.washington.edu, pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu, keno@cac.washington.edu, pine-faq@cac.washington.edu, kanelson@cac.washington.edu, pine-announce@cac.washington.edu, webguides@cac.washington.edu, imap@cac.washington.edu, faxhelp@cac.washington.edu Subject: You Won: $96457 Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 11:21:01 +0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--582867215273340642" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXIIIII, Probability=85%, Report='DCC_BULK_HIGH 3.5, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 3.000, INVALID_CHARSET 2, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, YOU_WON 0.000, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, URI_HEAVY 0, __DCC_BODY_10 0, __DCC_FUZ1_MANY 0, __DCC_FUZ2_MANY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0' ----582867215273340642 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-0114-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Hello,

We have received and processed your mortg[a]ge application.
You qualify for a $025100 loan and a 3% fixed rate.

Please fill out the final details to get started:
http://PARC.lender-shop.com/a1/ke.php?v2l=55

We look forward to hearing from you.

Regards,
The Wiston Network

not interested ----582867215273340642-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Jul 26 00:11:09 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 00:11:09 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6Q7B8VJ018433; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 00:11:08 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6Q7B7Nh026230 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 26 Jul 2004 00:11:07 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6Q7AkpK016300; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 00:10:46 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6Q77uGH068746 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 00:07:56 -0700 Received: from web8308.mail.in.yahoo.com (web8308.mail.in.yahoo.com [203.199.122.38]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6Q77riM025448 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 00:07:54 -0700 Received: from [203.193.157.82] by web8308.mail.in.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 08:07:52 BST Message-Id: <20040726070752.82637.qmail@web8308.mail.in.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 08:07:52 +0100 (BST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Prakash=20Babu?= To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: SSL/TLS failure MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-267296693-1090825672=:81704" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0.001, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __CTE 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, BIG_FONT 0, HTML_70_90 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, __MSGID_BEFORE_OKAY 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN --0-267296693-1090825672=:81704 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hello all, I have a problem testing the OpenSSL functionality of pine. Problem Description 1) I am working on HPUX platform 2) I created selfsigned certificate cert.pem and placed openssl certs directory 3) added imaps stream tcp nowait root /usr/sbin/imapd imapd to the file /etc/inetd.conf 4)modified the /etc/services entry as imaps 993/tcp 5)Restarted inetd /sbin/init.d/inetd stop /sbin/init.d/inetd start 6)Edited the inbox path as inbox-path={myserver.com/ssl/novalidate-cert}INBOX 7) Started pine pine 8) I got the following error There was an SSL/TLS failure for the server The reason for the failure was SSL negotiation failed What might be the cause for this error ? regards, Prakash Yahoo! India Careers: Over 65,000 jobsonline. --0-267296693-1090825672=:81704 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Hello all,
              I have a problem testing the OpenSSL functionality of pine.
 
Problem Description
1) I  am working on HPUX platform
 
2) I created selfsigned certificate cert.pem and placed openssl certs directory
 
3) added
 imaps     stream     tcp     nowait     root     /usr/sbin/imapd      imapd 
 to the file   /etc/inetd.conf
 
4)modified the /etc/services entry as
   imaps     993/tcp
 
5)Restarted inetd
/sbin/init.d/inetd stop 
/sbin/init.d/inetd start
 
6)Edited the inbox path as
inbox-path={myserver.com/ssl/novalidate-cert}INBOX
 
7) Started pine
   pine
 
8) I got the following error
There was an SSL/TLS failure for the server
The reason for the failure was  SSL negotiation failed
What might be the cause for this error ?
 
regards,
Prakash

Yahoo! India Careers: Over 65,000 jobs online. --0-267296693-1090825672=:81704-- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Jul 26 08:14:42 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 08:14:42 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6QFEgZ7002623 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 08:14:42 -0700 Received: from cac.washington.edu (d18a0720.hkg.hp.com [15.212.38.212]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6QFEdIN025655 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 08:14:40 -0700 Message-Id: <200407261514.i6QFEdIN025655@mx1.cac.washington.edu> From: "Bounced mail" To: pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 23:14:29 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_25F773F3.9A5FF4EA" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-UW-File-Check: Failed X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__TO_MALFORMED_2 0, FAILURE_NOTICE_1 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __NEXTPART_ALL 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __NEXTPART_NORMAL 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA_1 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __SOBIG_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000' This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_25F773F3.9A5FF4EA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+   --           Warning text added to this message by        --  +
+   --   University of Washington Computing & Communications  --  +
+   --                  help@cac.washington.edu               --  +
+                                                                 +
+ ATTACHMENTS DELETED                                             +
+                                                                 +
+ One or more attachments have been deleted from this message     +
+ by UW C&C because they are of a file type currently being       +
+ used by attackers to try to get viruses onto UW computers.      +
+                                                                 +
+ o If the sender of the message is known to you, and you were    +
+   expecting the attachments, you will need to make arrangements +
+   with the sender to receive the attachments by other means or  +
+   have the attachments resent after changing the file names.    +
+   For a list of offending file names, see                       +
+    http://www.washington.edu/computing/alerts/attachblock.html  +
+                                                                 +
+ o If the sender is not known to you, it is possible that this   +
+   is actually generated by a virus and you may safely delete    +
+   and ignore this message.                                      +
+                                                                 +
+ o If this message looks like an official message from some      +
+   UW organization and instructs you to open the attachment      +
+   to get important information, it is likely to be a fake.      +
+   Virus writers are increasingly using this technique (called   +
+   "social engineering") to mislead people into doing what they  +
+   want.                                                         +
+                                                                 +
+ C&C never sends attachments with information messages about     +
+ your account, password, or security issues. Instead, you will   +
+ be directed to a Web page on a C&C site.                        +
+                                                                 +
+ Further information may be found on the Major Computing and     +
+ Network Outages page at                                         +
+     http://www.washington.edu/computing/outages/                +
+ C&C will also post any updates to the Outages page as events    +
+ occur.                                                          +
+                                                                 +
+ Please contact help@cac or your local computing support team    +
+ if you have further questions.                                  +
+                                                                 +
+   --           Warning text added to this message by        --  +
+   --   University of Washington Computing & Communications  --  +
+   --                  help@cac.washington.edu               --  +
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
------=_NextPart_000_0000_25F773F3.9A5FF4EA-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jul 27 00:42:48 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 00:42:48 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6R7gmT6007387; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 00:42:48 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6R7gl00016422 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 27 Jul 2004 00:42:47 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6R7gS8S012988; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 00:42:28 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6R1CmtD091892 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:12:48 -0700 Received: from postal.usc.edu (postal.usc.edu [128.125.253.6]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6R1ApfP012531 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:12:47 -0700 Received: from aludra.usc.edu (aludra.usc.edu [128.125.253.184]) by postal.usc.edu (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.03 (built Apr 23 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I1H00LXGJURHTL0@postal.usc.edu> for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:54:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:54:27 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: kwhite To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: use of .pinrc in new version MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN My university is upgrading from pine 4.33 to 4.60. i have two questions: 1) Will they need to push a new .pinrc to each user because of the new available options, or can they just update the symbolic link to 'pine'. 2) Should I try to get them to go to 4.61 for any reason, like broken functionality in 4.60? thanks Kevin White USC Physics Dept. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jul 27 08:22:26 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:22:26 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6RFMP0P021702; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:22:25 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6RFMOHk030936 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:22:25 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6RFM9Y6012700; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:22:10 -0700 Received: from mxu8.u.washington.edu (mxu8.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.142]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6RFLAVH070066 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:21:10 -0700 Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1]) by mxu8.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6RFLALY017736 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:21:10 -0700 Received: from zeno3.math.washington.edu (zeno3.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.6]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i6RFJXYS014289; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:19:33 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:19:33 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: use of .pinrc in new version In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: kwhite X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.6; VAE 6.26.0.10; VDF 6.26.0.44 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** kwhite (anskwhite@aludra.usc.edu.not) wrote in the pine-info list on...: :) 1) Will they need to push a new .pinrc to each user because of the new :) available options, or can they just update the symbolic link to :) 'pine'. Kevin, There is no need to update the .pinerc file, it updates on its own. :) 2) Should I try to get them to go to 4.61 for any reason, like broken :) functionality in 4.60? Yes, there are some bugs in 4.60 which make Pine crash, which were fixed in 4.61, so it's better to use this new version than the old one. You can read the release notes in http://www.washington.edu/pine/changes.html click on the changes from 4.60 to 4.61 to get you an idea of what issues were found in 4.60. -- Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jul 27 10:45:12 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 10:45:12 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6RHjB6o027887; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 10:45:11 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6RHjAi9004608 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 27 Jul 2004 10:45:11 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6RHiuuu016674; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 10:44:57 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6RHhxjd052864 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 10:43:59 -0700 Received: from falcon.dickinson.edu ([64.9.63.131]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6RHf7IR031359 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 10:43:58 -0700 Received: from falcon.dickinson.edu by falcon.dickinson.edu (8.8.8/1.1.22.3/25Feb99-0911AM) id NAA0000007110; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:34:53 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:34:53 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Don Newcomer To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: IMAP on HP/UX (fwd) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Info mailing list X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __C230066_P5 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I sent this to Mark Crispin this morning but I'll toss it out to all of you as well. Maybe someone has some ideas. Thanks. Don Newcomer Senior Manager, Systems Infrastructure Systems Department Library and Information Services Dickinson College P.O. Box 1773 Carlisle, PA 17013 717-245-1256 (Voice) 717-245-1690 (FAX) newcomer@dickinson.edu ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:52:19 -0400 (EDT) From: Don Newcomer To: Mark Crispin Subject: IMAP on HP/UX Mark, I've monkeyed around enough that I _finally_ managed to get the Pine 4.61 suite to build under HP/UX 11.22. The only problem I'm seeing now is with IMAP. It built fine but I can't seem to connect to it from IE. When I telnet to port 143 on my Tru64 UNIX box (and IMAP works to this box) I get this: * OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4REV1 LOGIN-REFERRALS AUTH=LOGIN] falcon.dickinson.edu IMAP 4rev1 2003.339 at Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:49:03 -0400 (EDT) However, on my HP/UX box I get this: * OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4REV1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS AUTH=LOGIN] falcon2 IMAP4rev1 2004.352 at Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:49:52 -0400 (EDT) I think the whole problem is that reference to SASL. I did a build with "NOSSL" specified. Is there something else I need to do to keep SASL out of the picture? Don Newcomer Senior Manager, Systems Infrastructure Systems Department Library and Information Services Dickinson College P.O. Box 1773 Carlisle, PA 17013 717-245-1256 (Voice) 717-245-1690 (FAX) newcomer@dickinson.edu From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jul 27 11:04:01 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:04:01 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6RI41hQ028916 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:04:01 -0700 Received: from smtp-out1.iol.cz (smtp-out1.iol.cz [194.228.2.86]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6RI40Rn017997 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:04:00 -0700 Received: from iol.cz (ims-2.iol.cz [194.228.2.89]) by smtp-out1.iol.cz (Internet on Line ESMTP server) with ESMTP id 91309169582; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:03:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.30.65] (Forwarded-For: 192.116.71.228) by ims-2.iol.cz (mshttpd); Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:03:38 +0100 From: Message-ID: <41250854122039.41220394125085@iol.cz> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:03:38 +0100 X-Mailer: iPlanet Messenger Express 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Language: cs Subject: CAN YOU DO THIS FOR ME X-Accept-Language: cs Priority: normal Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: undisclosed-recipients:; X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIIII, Probability=98%, Report='DCC_BULK_HIGH 3.5, BILLION_DOLLARS 2.900, UNDISC_RECIPS 2.399, UPPERCASE_75_100 1.489, NIGERIAN_BODY1 1.296, MILLION_USD 1.204, LINES_OF_YELLING_3 0.671, SUPERLONG_LINE 0.003, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, LINES_OF_YELLING_2 0.001, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS 0.001, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, NO_REAL_NAME 0.000, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __BAT_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTE 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_13 0, __UPPERCASE_75_100 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_7 0, __CD 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __TO_MALFORMED_3 0, __CT 0, __DCC_FUZ1_MANY 0, __DCC_FUZ2_MANY 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, X_ACCEPT_LANG 0' REPLY ONLY TO: marcelbogdan1@echina.com DEAR FRIEND I AM MARCEL BOGDAN,I AM 56 YEARS OLD.I AM A CITIZEN OF ROMANIA, BUT I AM RESIDENT IN SOUTH AFRICA. I WAS BORN AN ORPHAN AND GOD BLESSED ME ABUNDANTLY.BUT I AM NOT A HAPPY MAN.I HAVE NO WIFE AND I HAVE NO CHILDREN. AS AT NOW I AM SERIOUSLY SICK. I JUST CAME OUT OF THE HOSPITAL BACK TO MY HOME . I AM SUFFERING FROM LUNG CANCER AND I HAD PATIAL STROKE WHICH HAS AFFECTED MY SPEACH. I CAN NO LONGER TALK.AND HALF OF MY BODY IS PARALYSED. THE DOCTORS SAY I HAVE ABOUT 2 MOUNTHS TO LIVE. I SEND THIS EMAIL TO YOU WITH THE HELP OF MY PRIVATE MALE NURSE WHO IS TYPING MY REQUEST. I HAVE LITTLE TIME SO I HAVE COMMITTED IT TO SPREADING MY WEALTH TOWARDS BETTER HEALTH CARE FOR MANKIND.IN THE HOSPITAL WHERE I AM ,I HAVE GIVEN THE MANAGEMENT US$15 MILLION TO UPGRADE AND BUILD A NEW CANCER RESEACH FACILITY.I HAVE ALSO MADE SOME CASH DONATIONS TO ORPHANAGE CHILDREN HOMES IN SOMALIA,ETHIOPIA,SUDAN,AND SOME IN SOUTH AFRICA. I HAVE SUCCEDED IN SPREADING MY LIQUID CASH TOWARDS WELL DESERVED MEANS. MY SOUL IS HAPPY. WHAT I AM DOING GIVES ME JOY.I AM NOW SHARING MY PROPERTIES AND VALUABLES.I DONT KNOW YOU, BUT I AM CONTACTING YOU WITH THE HOPE THAT YOU WILL CARRY OUT MY WISH FOR THE SAKE OF HUMANITY. I HAVE 8 MILLION DOLLARS (USD ) DEPOSITED WITH A DIPLOMATIC COURIER COMPANY IN EUROPE. I WANT YOU TO TAKE CUSTODY OF THE 8 MILLION DOLLARS (USD ) AND USE IT TO BUILD AND OPERATE(YOU COULD LOOK FOR SOMEONE TO OPERATE IT IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO) AN ORPHANAGE IN YOUR COUNTRY.YOU WILL NAME THE ORPHANAGE MARCEL BOGDAN ORPHANAGE HOME. YOU MUST FOLLOW MY WISH FOR IT WILL GLADEN MY HEART. IF YOU ARE READY TO DO THIS AND CARRYOUT MY WISH, THEN SEND ME [1]YOUR NAMES, [2]YOUR PHONE AND FAX NUMBER, [3]YOUR RESIDENTIAL ADDRESS, MY LAWYER WILL BE IN CONTACT WITH YOU.MAY GOD GUIDE US. SEND YOUR REPLY ALONG WITH YOUR PERSONAL DETAILS ONLY TO THE EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW : marcelbogdan1@echina.com I AWAIT YOUR REPLY. MY WARM GREETINGS MARCEL BOGDAN From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jul 27 12:54:35 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:54:35 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6RJsToJ001682; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:54:29 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6RJsSPL010042 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:54:29 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6RJsAl2013970; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:54:10 -0700 Received: from mxe2.u.washington.edu (mxe2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6RJrPwd067442 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:53:25 -0700 Received: from ticalc.ticalc.org (ticalc.ticalc.org [62.65.69.4]) by mxe2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6RJrLpd017313 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:53:22 -0700 Received: from ticalc.ticalc.org (ticalc.ticalc.org [62.65.69.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ticalc.ticalc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76C45E4F1 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:53:18 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:53:17 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Henrik Edlund To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Feature-request: alternate-addresses in address-book MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN There is this handy save rule that says Pine should try to find the "nick" in the addressbook for the sender/from of the message. It would be very nice if one for one person could list alternate address (non-primary) that this rule would match against. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jul 27 12:58:28 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:58:28 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6RJwS4O001935; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:58:28 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6RJwQE7022613 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:58:27 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6RJwFYs016736; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:58:15 -0700 Received: from mxe4.u.washington.edu (mxe4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6RJvsap032340 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:57:54 -0700 Received: from falcon.dickinson.edu ([64.9.63.229]) by mxe4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6RJvof2010152 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:57:51 -0700 Received: from falcon.dickinson.edu by falcon.dickinson.edu (8.8.8/1.1.22.3/25Feb99-0911AM) id PAA0000006533; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 15:40:53 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 15:40:53 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Don Newcomer To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: IMAP on HP/UX (fwd) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __C230066_P5 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Never mind. The issues was a DNS resolution problem on the PC side. IMAP's working fine. Don Newcomer Senior Manager, Systems Infrastructure Systems Department Library and Information Services Dickinson College P.O. Box 1773 Carlisle, PA 17013 717-245-1256 (Voice) 717-245-1690 (FAX) newcomer@dickinson.edu On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Don Newcomer wrote: > I sent this to Mark Crispin this morning but I'll toss it out to all of you > as well. Maybe someone has some ideas. Thanks. > > Don Newcomer > Senior Manager, Systems > Infrastructure Systems Department > Library and Information Services > Dickinson College > P.O. Box 1773 > Carlisle, PA 17013 > 717-245-1256 (Voice) > 717-245-1690 (FAX) > newcomer@dickinson.edu > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:52:19 -0400 (EDT) > From: Don Newcomer > To: Mark Crispin > Subject: IMAP on HP/UX > > Mark, I've monkeyed around enough that I _finally_ managed to get the Pine > 4.61 suite to build under HP/UX 11.22. The only problem I'm seeing now is > with IMAP. It built fine but I can't seem to connect to it from IE. When > I telnet to port 143 on my Tru64 UNIX box (and IMAP works to this box) I > get this: > > * OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4REV1 LOGIN-REFERRALS AUTH=LOGIN] falcon.dickinson.edu IMAP > 4rev1 2003.339 at Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:49:03 -0400 (EDT) > > However, on my HP/UX box I get this: > > * OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4REV1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS AUTH=LOGIN] falcon2 > IMAP4rev1 2004.352 at Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:49:52 -0400 (EDT) > > I think the whole problem is that reference to SASL. I did a build with > "NOSSL" specified. Is there something else I need to do to keep SASL out > of the picture? > > Don Newcomer > Senior Manager, Systems > Infrastructure Systems Department > Library and Information Services > Dickinson College > P.O. Box 1773 > Carlisle, PA 17013 > 717-245-1256 (Voice) > 717-245-1690 (FAX) > newcomer@dickinson.edu > From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jul 27 13:10:31 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:10:31 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6RKAQli002485; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:10:26 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6RKAPlg023129 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:10:25 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6RKADVA005216; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:10:13 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6RK9Xaw095372 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:09:33 -0700 Received: from tx3.oucs.ox.ac.uk (tx3.oucs.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.167]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6RK9QHJ030203 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:09:28 -0700 Received: from scan3.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.166] helo=localhost) by tx3.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BpYGK-0007cn-Oi for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:09:24 +0100 Received: from rx3.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.165]) by localhost (scan3.oucs.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.166]) (amavisd-new, port 25) with ESMTP id 28987-04 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:09:24 +0100 (BST) Received: from smtp1.herald.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.0.247]) by rx3.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BpYGK-0007ck-BO for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:09:24 +0100 Received: from oucs-jamesc.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.15.217] helo=oucs-jamesc) by smtp1.herald.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BpYGK-0003JM-3z for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:09:24 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:09:24 +0100 (BST) Reply-To: James.Cummings@ota.ahds.ac.uk Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: James Cummings To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Feature-Request: Changeable Roles in editing screen MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-X-Sender: jamesc@localhost X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi, I would like to be able to change what role I'm using to send a message at the editing screen (i.e. to/from/subject, etc.) without needing to manually edit the To/From fields. I know in most cases you can choose what role you want to compose with when starting a message from scratch, but I don't seem to be offered this option of changing roles when replying to a message. Nor, when is often the case, I use the 'mailing list management' option on the bottom of messages to post to a mailing list (as I am at the moment with this very list) since I never remember what address to post to. :-) I read a lot of mailing lists that will only let me post from the address I subscribed from - sometimes an entirely unique address for that mailing list alone - and to change thing manually for each reply is tedious. Does that make sense? Any reason why this can't be done? Have I missed something? -James --- Dr James Cummings, Oxford Text Archive, University of Oxford James dot Cummings at oucs dot ox dot ac dot uk -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jul 27 14:17:55 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:17:54 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6RLHsQV005779; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:17:54 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6RLHrKA013430 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:17:53 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6RLHehB016340; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:17:40 -0700 Received: from mxi2.u.washington.edu (mxi2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.12]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6RLGwkb024360 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:16:58 -0700 Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1]) by mxi2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6RLGviu009313 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:16:58 -0700 Received: from zeno3.math.washington.edu (zeno3.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.6]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i6RLGtYS014682; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:16:55 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:16:54 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Feature-Request: Changeable Roles in editing screen In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: James Cummings X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.6; VAE 6.26.0.10; VDF 6.26.0.44 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** James Cummings (James.Cummings@ota.ahds.ac.uk) wrote today: :) I know in most cases you can choose what role you want to compose with :) when starting a message from scratch, but I don't seem to be offered :) this option of changing roles when replying to a message. James, There is a feature in Pine4.61 which would help you do this. It is called "alternate-role-menu", which when enabled allows you to choose a role when you reply to a message. It works as follows: If you enable it, you can press "#" to choose a role, but you have the option to choose either to forward, compose or reply to the current message using the selected role. :) Nor, when is often the case, I use the 'mailing list management' :) option on the bottom of messages to post to a mailing list (as I am at :) the moment with this very list) since I never remember what address to :) post to. This requires that you be able to choose a role when you compose a message by following a mailto: link. You can do that only if you apply a patch which you can get from my web page (it requires, though, that you do not redefine what to do with a mailto: link using a scheme. This has to do with the configuration option url-viewers, and most people have not done this). -- Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jul 27 14:20:59 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:20:59 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6RLKwrR005942; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:20:58 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6RLKvW9026047 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:20:58 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6RLKk23015968; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:20:47 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6RLKNgT032426 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:20:23 -0700 Received: from noella.mindsec.com (noella.mindsec.com [216.198.14.227]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6RLKMhK029634 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:20:23 -0700 Received: from noella.mindsec.com (noella.mindsec.com [216.198.14.227]) by noella.mindsec.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A37083004D; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:20:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <0407271417450.88@somehost.domainz.com> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:20:22 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Erik Parker To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Feature-Request: Changeable Roles in editing screen In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Sender: Erik Parker X-To: James Cummings X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-GPG-Key: http://www.mindsec.com/staff/eparker/gpg.txt X-Use-Encryption: Encrypt your messages to me with PGP or GPG! X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __NEW_DOMAIN_EXTENSIONS_2 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I agree that this would be a nice feature.. however, I sub under many addresses to different lists.. and in my role definitions, I include body searches for those addresses.. so when I reply, it automatically selects that role. It is tedius if you are configuring many roles.. but at the same time, if you are going through the hassle of setting up the roles.. might as well add the search information in there. I use something like.. I have a couple of lists that dont seem to get caught quite right, so i put something unique from their headers in there to also snag on those: AllText pattern = email@domain.com [Broken-List] [Someother-List] Also.. you can configure pine to ask if you want to use a certain role when you hit reply. > I would like to be able to change what role I'm using > to send a message at the editing screen (i.e. to/from/subject, > etc.) without needing to manually edit the To/From fields. > > I know in most cases you can choose what role you want to > compose with when starting a message from scratch, but > I don't seem to be offered this option of changing roles > when replying to a message. Nor, when is often the case, From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jul 27 16:12:14 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 16:12:14 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6RNCAJ2011290; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 16:12:10 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6RNC9bB030644 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 27 Jul 2004 16:12:09 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6RNBuAI011004; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 16:11:57 -0700 Received: from mxe2.u.washington.edu (mxe2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6RN7S2t091404 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 16:07:28 -0700 Received: from tx1.oucs.ox.ac.uk (tx1.oucs.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.167]) by mxe2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6RMoIs3025698 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 15:50:18 -0700 Received: from scan1.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.1.166] helo=localhost) by tx1.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Bpam1-0005W6-H7 for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:50:17 +0100 Received: from rx1.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.1.165]) by localhost (scan1.oucs.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.166]) (amavisd-new, port 25) with ESMTP id 20951-04 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:50:17 +0100 (BST) Received: from smtp2.herald.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.0.235]) by rx1.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Bpam0-0005Vy-6Q; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:50:16 +0100 Received: from oucs-jamesc.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.15.217] helo=oucs-jamesc) by smtp2.herald.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1Bpam0-000217-3n; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:50:16 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:50:16 +0100 (BST) Reply-To: James.Cummings@ota.ahds.ac.uk Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: James Cummings To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Feature-Request: Changeable Roles in editing screen In-Reply-To: <0407271417450.88@somehost.domainz.com> References: <0407271417450.88@somehost.domainz.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Erik Parker X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: jamesc@localhost X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Erik Parker wrote: > > I agree that this would be a nice feature.. however, I sub under many > addresses to different lists.. and in my role definitions, I include body > searches for those addresses.. so when I reply, it automatically selects that > role. > > It is tedius if you are configuring many roles.. but at the same time, if you > are going through the hassle of setting up the roles.. might as well add the > search information in there. I've tried that and never had much success, must be something I'm doing wrong - I'll try the AllText patten Thanks, James --- Dr James Cummings, Oxford Text Archive, University of Oxford James dot Cummings at oucs dot ox dot ac dot uk From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jul 27 16:15:33 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 16:15:33 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6RNFVWL011477; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 16:15:31 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6RNFTxx018424 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 27 Jul 2004 16:15:31 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6RNFGdA015200; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 16:15:16 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6RNDpCJ026722 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 16:13:51 -0700 Received: from tx0.oucs.ox.ac.uk (tx0.oucs.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.163]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6RMdR0E025412 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 15:39:27 -0700 Received: from scan0.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.1.162] helo=localhost) by tx0.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BpabW-0003qL-Ew for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:39:26 +0100 Received: from rx0.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.1.161]) by localhost (scan0.oucs.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.162]) (amavisd-new, port 25) with ESMTP id 14113-09 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:39:26 +0100 (BST) Received: from smtp1.herald.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.0.247]) by rx0.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BpabW-0003q0-0i; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:39:26 +0100 Received: from oucs-jamesc.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.15.217] helo=oucs-jamesc) by smtp1.herald.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BpabW-0001jO-3z; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:39:26 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:39:26 +0100 (BST) Reply-To: James.Cummings@computing-services.oxford.ac.uk Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: James Cummings To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Feature-Request: Changeable Roles in editing screen In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Eduardo Chappa X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: jamesc@localhost X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Eduardo Chappa wrote: > *** James Cummings (James.Cummings@ota.ahds.ac.uk) wrote today: > > :) I know in most cases you can choose what role you want to compose with > :) when starting a message from scratch, but I don't seem to be offered > :) this option of changing roles when replying to a message. > > James, > > There is a feature in Pine4.61 which would help you do this. It is > called "alternate-role-menu", which when enabled allows you to choose a > role when you reply to a message. It works as follows: If you enable it, > you can press "#" to choose a role, but you have the option to choose > either to forward, compose or reply to the current message using the > selected role. I should have been clearer. I know about alternate-role-menu and use that when I compose. However, when replying to a message from a mailing list, where there are usually multiple recipients, pine asks "Reply to all recipients?" and when I say yes, takes me straight into editing the message without a chance to say what role to use. (This message is an example, sent to you and to the list, where althought alternate-role-menu is on, I wasn't given a chance anywhere to hit '#') And yes, I know what I should be doing is hitting '#' and then selecting reply, and then the role, but I so very often select 'r' instead of '#' since I'm *thinking* 'reply'. If I was able to change role easily in the editing screen, it wouldn't matter. Just like if I selected '#'->reply->role->edit and then wanted to change the role because I'd changed my mind ;-) > This requires that you be able to choose a role when you compose a message > by following a mailto: link. You can do that only if you apply a patch > which you can get from my web page (it requires, though, that you do not > redefine what to do with a mailto: link using a scheme. This has to do > with the configuration option url-viewers, and most people have not done > this). Ok, if I understand that, (but don't want to mess about with patches...). -James --- Dr James Cummings, Oxford Text Archive, University of Oxford James dot Cummings at oucs dot ox dot ac dot uk CALL FOR PAPERS: Digital Medievalism (Kalamazoo) and Early Drama (Leeds) see http://users.ox.ac.uk/~jamesc/cfp.html From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jul 27 16:36:18 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 16:36:18 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6RNaHej012341; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 16:36:17 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6RNaGm6031661 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 27 Jul 2004 16:36:17 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6RNa5j7016688; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 16:36:05 -0700 Received: from mxu9.u.washington.edu (mxu9.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.174]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6RNZQqr067338 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 16:35:26 -0700 Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1]) by mxu9.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6RNZQRh029643 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 16:35:26 -0700 Received: from zeno3.math.washington.edu (zeno3.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.6]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i6RNZNYS025888; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 16:35:23 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 16:35:23 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Feature-Request: Changeable Roles in editing screen In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: James.Cummings@computing-services.oxford.ac.uk X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.6; VAE 6.26.0.10; VDF 6.26.0.44 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** James Cummings (ansJames.Cummings@ota.ahds.ac.uk.not) wrote in the...: :) > There is a feature in Pine4.61 which would help you do this. It is :) > called "alternate-role-menu", which when enabled allows you to choose :) > a role when you reply to a message. It works as follows: If you :) > enable it, you can press "#" to choose a role, but you have the :) > option to choose either to forward, compose or reply to the current :) > message using the selected role. :) :) I should have been clearer. I know about alternate-role-menu and use :) that when I compose. However, when replying to a message from a :) mailing list, where there are usually multiple recipients, pine asks :) "Reply to all recipients?" and when I say yes, takes me straight into :) editing the message without a chance to say what role to use. James, You were clear from the start. I understood your problem. I was suggesting a work around. What you want is not really possible, you've already chosen a role (or none) when you are in the composer, and that can not be changed (it's like saying "I don't want to get wet" when you are already inside the pool). I think there are good reasons so that this can not be done at that stage. For example it's not possible to change your signature, and less do it if you use an alternate editor, etc. If you were willing to choose a role when you press "R" to reply to the message, I would suggest you a patch, but that does not seem to be what you want to do either, so I guess the answer is that it is not possible to do what you want. -- Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jul 27 23:23:33 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:23:33 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6S6NXV5024302; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:23:33 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6S6NWBI032620 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:23:32 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6S6NIKq016184; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:23:18 -0700 Received: from mxe5.u.washington.edu (mxe5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.168]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6S6MVJP115762 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:22:31 -0700 Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by mxe5.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6S6MTYY018552 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:22:30 -0700 Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Bphpc-0000oQ-00 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 08:22:29 +0200 Received: from acbd79b1.ipt.aol.com ([172.189.121.177]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 08:22:28 +0200 Received: from nm-reverse-spam-filter by acbd79b1.ipt.aol.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 08:22:28 +0200 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:22:30 +0100 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Nancy McGough To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Feature-Request: Changeable Roles in editing screen In-Reply-To: <0407271417450.88@somehost.domainz.com> References: <0407271417450.88@somehost.domainz.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Sender: news X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: acbd79b1.ipt.aol.com X-Message-Flag: Worried about bugs & viruses? Switch to Mac/Unix/PC Pine - info @ www.ii.com X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On 27 Jul 2004 Erik Parker (eparker@mindsec.com) wrote: > I agree that this would be a nice feature.. I also would like to be able to change the role while in the midst of composing. FYI, Mulbery, the other decent IMAP client, can do this. > Also.. you can configure pine to ask if you want to use a certain role when > you hit reply. Yes, try setting this in your feature list: [X] alternate-compose-menu And then you'll get something like this when you type 'R' to Reply: Use role "nm-public" for Reply? ? Help Y [Yes] ^T To Select Alternate Role ^C Cancel N No, use default settings And you can type ^T to choose a role. There are some other features that can be used to change the way the Reply prompts work so you might need to experiment with a bunch of features until you get a config you're happy with. HTH, Nancy Infinite Ink www.ii.com From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Jul 27 23:47:11 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:47:11 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6S6l9lL024984; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:47:09 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6S6l7Ja012852 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:47:08 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6S6ktjn015838; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:46:55 -0700 Received: from mxe2.u.washington.edu (mxe2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6S6kJST116984 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:46:19 -0700 Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by mxe2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6S6kIn1004704 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:46:18 -0700 Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BpiCf-0001G2-00 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 08:46:17 +0200 Received: from acbd79b1.ipt.aol.com ([172.189.121.177]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 08:46:17 +0200 Received: from nm-reverse-spam-filter by acbd79b1.ipt.aol.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 08:46:17 +0200 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:46:22 +0100 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Nancy McGough To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Feature-Request: Changeable Roles in editing screen In-Reply-To: References: <0407271417450.88@somehost.domainz.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Sender: news X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: acbd79b1.ipt.aol.com X-Message-Flag: Worried about bugs & viruses? Switch to Mac/Unix/PC Pine - info @ www.ii.com X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On 28 Jul 2004 Nancy McGough (nm-reverse-spam-filter@ii.deflexion.com) wrote: > > [X] alternate-compose-menu > > And you can type ^T to choose a role. There are some other > features that can be used to change the way the Reply prompts > work so you might need to experiment with a bunch of features > until you get a config you're happy with. Another feature that you might want to use is this: [ ] confirm-role-even-for-default I have this unset, but you might like it. I have some Tips for Role Playing here: which might give you more ideas for how to get a config you're happy with. I need to update that section so it discusses the 4.61 features, e.g., using a role to bounce forward (B) a message. Nancy Infinite Ink www.ii.com From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jul 28 00:59:59 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 00:59:59 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6S7xwaf026990 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 00:59:58 -0700 Received: from web50006.mail.yahoo.com (web50006.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.21]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6S7xv7P015016 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 00:59:57 -0700 Message-ID: <20040728075956.99035.qmail@web50006.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [217.26.84.214] by web50006.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 00:59:56 PDT Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 00:59:56 -0700 (PDT) From: jark dudu Subject: GOLD FOR SALE To: jarkdudu2003@yahoo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-782506733-1091001596=:97690" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='SUPERLONG_LINE 0.003, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS 0.001, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0.001, __SANE_MSGID 0, __FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __MSGID_BEFORE_RECEIVED 0, DEAR_SOMETHING 0.000, __MSGID_BEFORE_OKAY 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __RATWARE_SIGNATURE_3_N1 0, HTML_50_70 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, __HAS_MSGID 0' --0-782506733-1091001596=:97690 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Dear Sir, I Mr.Jark Dudu with full legal and Corporate responsibility and under penalty of perjury with full knowledge of the act of fraud and as a seller am ready,willing and able to deliver the herein offered (AU) Metal under the following terms and conditions: Commoodity :A.U.Metal (Gold) of unrefined Dust and Bars. Purity :96,75% Impurity :03,25% Quality :22 Karate Plus Quantity :500Kg. (200 Kg Bars and 300Kg Dust) Price :5,200 USD per Kg. Origin : Ghana Destination : Benin Clearing Agent Cotonou Packing :Stored in Metal Box for safe keeping. Documents available : Certificate of Origin,Certificate of Ownership and SGS report. Method of payment :20% of the total value must be paid by the buyer and ballance to be paid at buyer's destination after refining. Note: The payment of 20% is to settle all expenses and to process the necessary documents. Documentations ;Will be completed by clearing agent inspected and stamped by appropriated Authorities. The buyer along with the seller will escort the Gold to an appropriated bonded ware house in buyer's destination for completion and outstanding ballance of 80%. Buyer must come to Cotonou - Benin to control all the quantity,test the quality and sign Agreement with the seller. I stand ready to your questions and proposed informations as to this regards. I am prepared to answer any questions and furnish you with more informations you might need from me. Regards Mr.Jark Dudu --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! --0-782506733-1091001596=:97690 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Dear Sir,
I Mr.Jark Dudu with full legal and Corporate responsibility and under penalty of perjury with full knowledge of the act of fraud and as a seller am ready,willing and able to deliver the herein offered (AU) Metal under the following terms and conditions:
 
Commoodity            :A.U.Metal (Gold) of unrefined Dust and Bars.
Purity                      :96,75%
Impurity                   :03,25%
Quality                     :22 Karate Plus
Quantity                   :500Kg. (200 Kg Bars and 300Kg Dust)
Price                        :5,200 USD per Kg.
Origin                       : Ghana
Destination               : Benin Clearing Agent Cotonou
Packing                    :Stored in Metal Box for safe keeping.
Documents available  : Certificate of Origin,Certificate of Ownership and SGS  report.
Method of payment    :20% of the total value must be paid by the buyer and ballance
                                
to be paid at buyer's destination after refining.
 
Note: The payment of 20% is to settle all expenses and to process the necessary
documents.
Documentations        ;Will be completed by clearing agent inspected and stamped
by appropriated Authorities.
The buyer along with the seller will escort the Gold to an appropriated bonded ware
house in buyer's destination for completion and outstanding ballance of 80%.
Buyer must come to Cotonou - Benin to control all the quantity,test the quality and
sign Agreement with the seller.
I stand ready to your questions and proposed informations as to this regards.
I am prepared to answer any questions and furnish you with more informations you might need from me.
Regards
Mr.Jark Dudu


Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! --0-782506733-1091001596=:97690-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jul 28 03:01:59 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 03:01:59 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6SA1wGf001404; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 03:01:58 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6SA1vsS007308 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 28 Jul 2004 03:01:57 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6SA1Zjp016606; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 03:01:35 -0700 Received: from mxe2.u.washington.edu (mxe2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6SA0Fov068858 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 03:00:15 -0700 Received: from tx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk (tx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.163]) by mxe2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6SA0Ew9003381 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 03:00:15 -0700 Received: from scan2.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.162] helo=localhost) by tx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BplEM-0004Pb-Ju for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:00:14 +0100 Received: from rx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.161]) by localhost (scan2.oucs.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.162]) (amavisd-new, port 25) with ESMTP id 16617-05 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:00:13 +0100 (BST) Received: from smtp1.herald.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.0.247]) by rx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BplEK-0004P9-9K; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:00:12 +0100 Received: from oucs-jamesc.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.15.217] helo=oucs-jamesc) by smtp1.herald.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BplEK-0006Bd-3z; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:00:12 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:00:12 +0100 (BST) Reply-To: James.Cummings@ota.ahds.ac.uk Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: James Cummings To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Feature-Request: Changeable Roles in editing screen In-Reply-To: References: <0407271417450.88@somehost.domainz.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Nancy McGough X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: jamesc@localhost X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, Nancy McGough wrote: > I also would like to be able to change the role while in the > midst of composing. FYI, Mulbery, the other decent IMAP client, > can do this. Thanks to Nancy and Eduardo for their suggestions. I guess the reason it bothers me not to be able to change role once in composing and editing, is that when I go to send Pine prompts me with: Send Message (as James.Cummings@ota.ahds.ac.uk)? Really, I guess it is at this point that an alarm bell goes off in my head and I say "No, I don't want to send it as that address....but oh, how can I change it now?" Patching is probably the answer, Eduardo is right, I'm just too lazy to remember to repatch stuff when I upgrade, etc. -James --- Dr James Cummings, Oxford Text Archive, University of Oxford James dot Cummings at oucs dot ox dot ac dot uk From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jul 28 07:08:59 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:08:58 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6SE8wkR009083; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:08:58 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6SE8v4h014864 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:08:57 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6SE8gSC019556; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:08:43 -0700 Received: from mxu9.u.washington.edu (mxu9.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.174]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6SE5PRd097344 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:05:25 -0700 Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1]) by mxu9.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6SE5PBZ021616 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:05:25 -0700 Received: from zeno3.math.washington.edu (zeno3.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.6]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i6SE5MYS009964; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:05:23 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:05:22 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Feature-Request: Changeable Roles in editing screen In-Reply-To: References: <0407271417450.88@somehost.domainz.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Nancy McGough X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.6; VAE 6.26.0.10; VDF 6.26.0.48 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** Nancy McGough (ansnm-reverse-spam-filter@ii.deflexion.com.not) wrote in...: :) > Also.. you can configure pine to ask if you want to use a certain :) > role when you hit reply. :) :) Yes, try setting this in your feature list: :) :) [X] alternate-compose-menu :) :) And then you'll get something like this when you type 'R' to Reply: :) :) Use role "nm-public" for Reply? :) ? Help Y [Yes] ^T To Select Alternate Role :) ^C Cancel N No, use default settings This is not correct, this menu does not appear because of the feature alternate-compose-menu, this menu appears because the role is used with confirmation. The alternate-compose-menu setting has to do with what happens after you press "C" to compose, not after pressing "R", "F" or "#". I like it a lot. I have information on this in my web page http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/pine-info/roles/#compose Maybe one way in which James can get the prompt you suggest is if he edits all his roles to be used with confirmation for reply use, plus add a role at the end that matches everything that is still used with confirmation. It would be an ugly work around but it would work. -- Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jul 28 07:22:58 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:22:58 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6SEMv6b009465; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:22:57 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6SEMuoB026875 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:22:57 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6SEMiNq017588; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:22:44 -0700 Received: from mxe2.u.washington.edu (mxe2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6SEKGBH109712 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:20:16 -0700 Received: from mail.cboss.ru (mail.cboss.ru [195.245.232.9]) by mxe2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6SEKD94017278 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:20:14 -0700 Received: from alemate.int.cboss.ru ([10.2.131.6]) (authenticated aaleks bits=0) by mail.cboss.ru with ESMTP id i6SEJ5ot002507 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:19:11 +0400 (MSD) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:19:05 +0400 (MSD) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Alexander V Alekseev To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Feature-Request: Changeable Roles in editing screen In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: alex@alemate.int.cboss.ru X-Archived: msg.XXVOmiw3@oas-db.srv.cboss.ru X-Archived: msg.XXCyQGGb@mail X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello! On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, James Cummings wrote: > I would like to be able to change what role I'm using > to send a message at the editing screen (i.e. to/from/subject, > etc.) without needing to manually edit the To/From fields. I need this feature too! My case: I have different SMTP servers for different roles. So, If I make a mistake in SMTP server name or parameters in role, message will never be sent, because I can't change role after I compose a message! Bye. Alex. -- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jul 28 10:49:35 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:49:35 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6SHnY41018835; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:49:34 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6SHnXcY024251 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:49:34 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6SHnINF014732; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:49:18 -0700 Received: from mxe4.u.washington.edu (mxe4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6SHmQqA036046 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:48:26 -0700 Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mxe4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6SHmPcC005292 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:48:26 -0700 Received: from mailgate2.apple.com (a17-128-100-204.apple.com [17.128.100.204]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6SHo1cN001996 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:50:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay3.apple.com (relay3.apple.com) by mailgate2.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.6) with ESMTP id for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:48:25 -0700 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6SHmNpc009583 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:48:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:48:23 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Feature-Request: Changeable Roles in editing screen In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Eduardo Chappa wrote: > You were clear from the start. I understood your problem. I was >suggesting a work around. What you want is not really possible, you've >already chosen a role (or none) when you are in the composer, and that can >not be changed (it's like saying "I don't want to get wet" when you are >already inside the pool). I don't use any of this role stuff, but from an outside perspective, being able to change this on the fly seems useful. Now, the steps necessary in a theoretical implementation _might_ be almost as tedious as just starting over. But the main reason was the following.. >For example it's not possible to change your signature, and less do it if you >use an alternate editor, etc. I must be misunderstanding this.. ###-- ###top-posting: It's just a bad idea. That's my signature (I added the ###s) in the message, and I can edit it just fine. I am using an alternate editor. Now, if you mean you can't change your signature permanently while editing the current message, yeah.. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Jul 28 22:24:47 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 22:24:46 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6T5OhAm012865; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 22:24:43 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6T5Ogmn024970 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 28 Jul 2004 22:24:43 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6T5OK1p008554; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 22:24:20 -0700 Received: from mxe5.u.washington.edu (mxe5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.168]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6T5NUwK041494 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 22:23:31 -0700 Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by mxe5.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6T5NTfA001763 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 22:23:30 -0700 Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Bq3O4-0002Hu-00 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:23:28 +0200 Received: from acb998c8.ipt.aol.com ([172.185.152.200]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:23:28 +0200 Received: from nm-reverse-spam-filter by acb998c8.ipt.aol.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:23:28 +0200 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 06:23:29 +0100 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Nancy McGough To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Feature-Request: Changeable Roles in editing screen In-Reply-To: References: <0407271417450.88@somehost.domainz.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Sender: news X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: acb998c8.ipt.aol.com X-Message-Flag: Worried about bugs & viruses? Switch to Mac/Unix/PC Pine - info @ www.ii.com X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On 28 Jul 2004 Eduardo Chappa (chappa@math.washington.edu) wrote: > :) > :) Use role "nm-public" for Reply? > :) ? Help Y [Yes] ^T To Select Alternate Role > :) ^C Cancel N No, use default settings > > This is not correct, this menu does not appear because of the feature > alternate-compose-menu, this menu appears because the role is used with > confirmation. Thanks for the correction Eduardo. I have all my roles set up to to be used "With confirmation" on Reply, Forward, or Compose and it's been so long since I set them up that I forgot about that aspect of my config. This is another thing that I need to add to my "Tips for Role Playing." Thanks, Nancy Infinite Ink www.ii.com From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Jul 29 00:43:28 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 00:43:28 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6T7hRSt017328; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 00:43:28 -0700 Received: from docsis172-177.menta.net (docsis172-177.menta.net [62.57.172.177]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6T7g6qA028963; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 00:42:49 -0700 X-Message-Info: 5YE38WQPzqtk786XU3zjINnjqV1C1wnC8cJLNdqY7HE4B Received: (from canvasback@62.57.172.177) by discriminateB.136.206.132.98 (5.4E.8/F.80.2) id k75FCReZ3AF9; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:37:58 +0600 Message-ID: Reply-To: "Elba Gaines" From: "Elba Gaines" To: "Pine-info" Subject: don't be sorry next week that you forgot to buy this stock Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 02:34:58 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--47CC41CE4CC997B5901E" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXX, Probability=90%, Report='X_MESSAGE_INFO_HEADER 4.000, DCC_BULK_HIGH 3.5, INVALID_CHARSET 2, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, GET_IT_NOW 0.000, __MOZILLA_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1_MANY 0, __DCC_FUZ2_MANY 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0' ----47CC41CE4CC997B5901E Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-1AC5-3" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Untitled Document Private Investment Group with $BILLIONS TO BUY 20% of LETH
Shares Jump 30% on 5-times the Daily Volume!

Diamond Ridge Advisors will purchase 6.5 Million shares of Life
Energy & Technology (LETH) in the open market immediately, adding to the 20% of LETH it purchased last year in a private transaction.

=

Diamond Ridge previously paid about $1.50 per share, or an investment <= br> of around $10 Million. We know they will pay much, much more per
share with even more dollars spent by having to acquire shares at
market prices. Acquiring 6.5 million shares of LETH won't be easy with <= br> only 9 million LETH shares in the float.

This sudden influx of cash-based buying will cause explosive action in =
the stock. Our conservative expectations would indicate a $5-$7 price level very quickly. Diamond Ridge is one of the most successful and
= aggressive private investment groups. They arranged financing of $250 Million for LETH last quarter for global product expansion. Things are <= br> obviously progressing better than anticipated for this buying to take place and for them to file the required Schedule 13D/A with the S.E.C.

LETH has 26 operating environmental systems in place worldwide that convert assorted categories of waste into clean, "green electricity=
" The Company is strongly positioned with $36 Million in assets and=
$23 Million in cash, not including a sales backlog exceeding
$100 Million for their Biosphere Process System. LETH is experiencing a breakout year and this partial "buy-out" throws jet fuel on = the fire!

The stock has already bounced sharply from its 52-week low and should <= br> continue to rocket skyward immediately. We think the stock could easily =
reach $5 in less than a month!

LETH stock will soar - GO GET IT NOW!

----47CC41CE4CC997B5901E-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Jul 29 07:17:08 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:17:08 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6TEH7sJ029737; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:17:07 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6TEH6kk007821 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:17:07 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6TEGmNg016416; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:16:48 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6TEFcDa030130 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:15:38 -0700 Received: from www.provisio.net ([209.31.146.75]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6TEFaBI031880 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:15:37 -0700 Received: from www.provisio.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.provisio.net id i6TEFWTj082507 envelope-from pine@coppit.org for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:15:32 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from pine@coppit.org) Received: from localhost (dcoppit@localhost) by www.provisio.net (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) with ESMTP id i6TEFRFG082497 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:15:27 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:15:27 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: David Coppit To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Subject sort rules? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Authentication-Warning: www.provisio.net: dcoppit owned process doing -bs X-X-Sender: dcoppit@www.provisio.net X-Provisio-MailScanner-Information: Contact Paco Hope phone: 703-606-1905 X-Provisio-MailScanner: Judged to be clean X-MailScanner-From: pine@coppit.org X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, X_AUTH_WARNING 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN How does pine sort subjects? It looks to me like it ignores "Re:" and "[blah]" at the front of subjects. What other rules are there? Is there any way to sort so that it doesn't ignore these? Thanks, David _____________________________________________________________________ David Coppit david@coppit.org The College of William and Mary http://coppit.org/ "Use 'logout' to leave this shell" -- You know what I want. Just do it! -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Jul 29 08:52:09 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 08:52:09 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6TFq9QU000605; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 08:52:09 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6TFq8RE011391 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 29 Jul 2004 08:52:08 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6TFppf4010852; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 08:51:52 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6TFp4dx097466 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 08:51:04 -0700 Received: from fe5.cox-internet.com (fe5-cox.cox-internet.com [66.76.2.50]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6TFp3MU026486 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 08:51:03 -0700 Received: from edocomputer ([24.250.169.216]) by fe5.cox-internet.com (InterMail vK.4.04.00.03 201-232-140-20030416 license 2c0225210a073aa8d80c3b96b8e7ebaa) with ESMTP id <20040729155103.SQQQ499.fe5@edocomputer>; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:51:03 -0500 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:50:26 -0500 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Subject sort rules? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: David Coppit X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, David Coppit wrote: :) How does pine sort subjects? It looks to me like it ignores "Re:" and :) "[blah]" at the front of subjects. What other rules are there? Is there :) any way to sort so that it doesn't ignore these? Pine also ignores "(fwd)" and some ENGLISH variations of that string too, that's part of the algorithm used for sorting, and there's nothing you can do about it, unless you manually edit that header. -- Eduardo http://wwww.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Jul 29 10:46:33 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:46:33 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6THkWmM006512; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:46:32 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6THkV07029456 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:46:31 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6THkE4d017466; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:46:14 -0700 Received: from mxe5.u.washington.edu (mxe5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.168]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6THjRm7027632 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:45:27 -0700 Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mxe5.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6THjRfT020860 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:45:27 -0700 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out3.apple.com (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i6THkPCW012470 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:46:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay4.apple.com (relay4.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.12) with ESMTP id for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:45:26 -0700 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6THjP0B003856 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:45:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:45:24 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Subject sort rules? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, David Coppit wrote: > How does pine sort subjects? It looks to me like it ignores "Re:" and > "[blah]" at the front of subjects. What other rules are there? Is there > any way to sort so that it doesn't ignore these? Do you mean you want it to not ignore "Re:" or some other possibly unknown to you subject prefixes? Basically, I don't want to limit someone's configurability (I think lots of settings/preferences are GOOD, though I do agree that very often they can/should be separated into simple/advanced settings)... but if it IS Re: you want to ignore, I am kind of curious why. Though I guess with real thread sorting nowadays you wouldn't sort by thread to sort of approximate threading. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Jul 29 14:12:23 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:12:23 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6TLCMOL016588; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:12:22 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6TLCLXo026212 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:12:21 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6TLC8Ea014418; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:12:08 -0700 Received: from mxe2.u.washington.edu (mxe2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6TLBLRb123168 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:11:21 -0700 Received: from www.provisio.net ([209.31.146.75]) by mxe2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6TLBKES009341 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:11:20 -0700 Received: from www.provisio.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.provisio.net id i6TLBJ5M002145 envelope-from pine@coppit.org for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 17:11:19 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from pine@coppit.org) Received: from localhost (dcoppit@localhost) by www.provisio.net (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) with ESMTP id i6TLBDm1002142 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 17:11:14 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 17:11:13 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: David Coppit To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Subject sort rules? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: www.provisio.net: dcoppit owned process doing -bs X-X-Sender: dcoppit@www.provisio.net X-Provisio-MailScanner-Information: Contact Paco Hope phone: 703-606-1905 X-Provisio-MailScanner: Judged to be clean X-MailScanner-From: pine@coppit.org X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, X_AUTH_WARNING 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, Matt Ackeret wrote: > Basically, I don't want to limit someone's configurability (I think > lots of settings/preferences are GOOD, though I do agree that very often they > can/should be separated into simple/advanced settings)... but if it IS > Re: you want to ignore, I am kind of curious why. I tag viruses and spam using [SPAM] and [VIRUS]. I'd like to deal with all the spam first, then all the viruses. I think I can just use {SPAM} and {VIRUS} instead and pine will sort them like I want--I'll test it out. David _____________________________________________________________________ David Coppit david@coppit.org The College of William and Mary http://coppit.org/ "Use 'logout' to leave this shell" -- You know what I want. Just do it! From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Jul 29 14:23:17 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:23:17 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6TLNGBR016981; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:23:16 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6TLNFY7007982 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:23:15 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6TLMx7o017388; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:22:59 -0700 Received: from mxe2.u.washington.edu (mxe2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6TLM8Uv092272 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:22:08 -0700 Received: from mango.cc.columbia.edu (mango.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.59.104]) by mxe2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6TLM6Ja012512 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:22:07 -0700 Received: from mango.cc.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mango.cc.columbia.edu (8.13.0/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6TLM0px020933; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 17:22:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (fbb6@localhost) by mango.cc.columbia.edu (8.13.0/8.12.3/Submit) with ESMTP id i6TLLwje020929; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 17:21:59 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 17:21:56 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Freda B Birnbaum To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Subject sort rules? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Sender: fbb6@columbia.edu X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Cc: Freda B Birnbaum X-Authentication-Warning: mango.cc.columbia.edu: fbb6 owned process doing -bs X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, X_AUTH_WARNING 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, David Coppit wrote: > I tag viruses and spam using [SPAM] and [VIRUS]. I'd like to deal with > all the spam first, then all the viruses. I think I can just use {SPAM} > and {VIRUS} instead and pine will sort them like I want--I'll test it > out. The real irritation of this feature comes when trying to sort mail from mailing lists which use [list] or [list:nnnn] at the beginning of the subject header. You can't sort the items in order of the nnnn number because the stuff in brackets is ignored. I know, normally date or arrival order should take care of this, but sometimes it doesn't. Freda Birnbaum, fbb6@columbia.edu "Call on God, but row away from the rocks" From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Jul 29 15:25:08 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:25:08 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6TMP7el019460; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:25:07 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6TMP66C029279 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:25:07 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6TMOrns014274; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:24:53 -0700 Received: from mxu8.u.washington.edu (mxu8.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.142]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6TMOGiX107710 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:24:16 -0700 Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by mxu8.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6TMOGP2015494 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:24:16 -0700 Received: from mtyav04.prueba.mx (na-207-249-140-99.na.avantel.net.mx [207.249.140.99] (may be forged)) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6TMOFco010857 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:24:15 -0700 Received: from [218.165.84.28] by mtyav04.prueba.mx (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20040727060203.PDOD14817.mtyav04.prueba.mx@[218.165.84.28]>; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 01:02:03 -0500 Message-Id: <20040727060203.PDOD14817.mtyav04.prueba.mx@[218.165.84.28]> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:05:19 +0800 Reply-To: scott@nospam.net Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: owner-pine-info@cac.washington.edu To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: u Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0089_01C38DA7.9B3A1D10" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-To: "saeb@pilechkohinet.net" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Mircosoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIII, Probability=93%, Report='URI_CLASS_UNCLASSIFIED_DOMAIN 8, IMGSPAM_BODY 1.480, DATE_IN_PAST_12_24 0.776, HTML_CHARSET_FARAWAY 0.001, __SANE_MSGID 0, NO_REAL_NAME 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __NEXTPART_ALL 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __NEXTPART_NORMAL 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __HIGHBITS 0, __HTML_CHARSET_FARAWAY 0, __IMGSPAM_BODY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __IMGSPAM_BODY_1 0, HTML_90_100 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2_10 0, IMGSPAM_BODY_1 0.000, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, MAY_BE_FORGED 0.000, __HAS_MSGID 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN This is a multi-part message in MIME format ------=_NextPart_000_0089_01C38DA7.9B3A1D10 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ------=_NextPart_000_0089_01C38DA7.9B3A1D10 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =B7s=BCW=BA=F4=AD=B61

= ------=_NextPart_000_0089_01C38DA7.9B3A1D10-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jul 30 00:15:31 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 00:15:30 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from 140.142.10.196 ([211.41.240.2]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6U7FRVf001772 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 00:15:29 -0700 X-Message-Info: FAMFgbIJ0rYSlouJew3b5XH4PKyukCLHcuh Received: from b18.earthlink.net (18.143.0.210) by m369-k.earthlink.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); Fri, 30 Jul 2004 01:07:51 -0700 Received: from aspersionprocessorps308 (sourwood248.132.10.148) by earthlink.net (nupw985) with SMTP id <062022252343147g87h> (Authid: WinstonGallagher); Fri, 30 Jul 2004 01:05:51 -0700 From: "Morgan Madden" To: "'Mailarch+pine-info'" Subject: Get them now - cheep meds on the web! czarina Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:06:51 +0400 Message-ID: <817xpm21ksu602$00t552kd4$7hxo3uo@guanidinebt05745> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--5441617012460954549" ----5441617012460954549 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Hi and welcome to our phaarmecy!

One of the things we offer to you, as a selected costomer, is a big variety,
combined with good prjces.
All the medjcatjons you need with cheep prjcees !

We got all original brands and geneeric:
vjagra, cjaljs, lavjtra, xanaax, valioom and a lot more!


http://reddonkey33.com/100/index.php?ai=7707


slurry allegheny ma ouff chapman ethos
angry countermen enthusiasm culminate fancy sixth alai pulverable transmittance sanicle vectorial.[2 ----5441617012460954549-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jul 30 01:16:35 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 01:16:35 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6U8GYrL003529; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 01:16:34 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6U8GXZb018164 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 30 Jul 2004 01:16:33 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6U8GHjP016430; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 01:16:17 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6U8FJN4030104 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 01:15:20 -0700 Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6U8FIBj023856 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 01:15:19 -0700 Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BqSXt-0005sS-00 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:15:17 +0200 Received: from acba77c1.ipt.aol.com ([172.186.119.193]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:15:17 +0200 Received: from nm-reverse-spam-filter by acba77c1.ipt.aol.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:15:17 +0200 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:15:18 +0100 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Nancy McGough To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Subject sort rules? In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Sender: news X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: acba77c1.ipt.aol.com X-Message-Flag: Worried about bugs & viruses? Switch to Mac/Unix/PC Pine - info @ www.ii.com X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On 29 Jul 2004 David Coppit (pine@coppit.org) wrote: > > I tag viruses and spam using [SPAM] and [VIRUS]. I'd like to deal with all > the spam first, then all the viruses. I think I can just use {SPAM} and > {VIRUS} instead and pine will sort them like I want--I'll test it out. Sorting square bracketed text in the Subject is not just a pine issue, but a genereal IMAP issue. I discuss this on my Reverse Spam Filtering page in this section: --- begin excerpt --- One of the keys to my deflexion strategy is to have the spam score (_HITS_) inserted into the beginning of the Subject header. This makes it easy to order messages by score because I can simply do a sort-by-subject in my mail client. I recommend that you surround the Subject tag with braces (squiggly brackets) because 1) these tagged Subjects will then sort below almost all other Subjects when the Subjects are sorted using an ASCII sort (because { is charcter 123 out of 127); and 2) a popular alternative, square brackets, will not work in an IMAP sort because the IMAP sort and thread specification says to ignore text that is in square brackets during a sort. If you want to muck around with the format of the _HITS_ token, see Keith C. Ivey's message Re: adding SPAM hits score to headers in the SA mailing list. --- end excerpt --- The web page version of the above contains lots of links to relevant information. Another issue to be aware of is that Pine can display IMAP keywords in the MESSAGE INDEX screen and it surrounds those with squiggly brackets and prepends them to the Subject field. So you might want to use something other than squiggly brackets to distinguish your tags from IMAP keywords. (Or you could just use IMAP keywords for all this!) For now, I'm putting the spam score in the Cc: header and have set up my Pine index-format so it includes 'CC'. I just posted about this yesterday in the SpamAssassin list here: It's all quite bogus -- I hope there are standards for Spam and Virus headers soon! Nancy Infinite Ink www.ii.com From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jul 30 06:05:28 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 06:05:28 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6UD5Sse012978; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 06:05:28 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6UD5Qtl028622 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 30 Jul 2004 06:05:27 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6UD563u017454; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 06:05:06 -0700 Received: from mxe4.u.washington.edu (mxe4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6UD4CPF123380 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 06:04:12 -0700 Received: from www.provisio.net ([209.31.146.75]) by mxe4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6UD4B8A002790 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 06:04:11 -0700 Received: from www.provisio.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.provisio.net id i6UD485M063761 envelope-from pine@coppit.org for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:04:08 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from pine@coppit.org) Received: from localhost (dcoppit@localhost) by www.provisio.net (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) with ESMTP id i6UD42gZ063756 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:04:03 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:04:02 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: David Coppit To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Subject sort rules? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: www.provisio.net: dcoppit owned process doing -bs X-X-Sender: dcoppit@www.provisio.net X-Provisio-MailScanner-Information: Contact Paco Hope phone: 703-606-1905 X-Provisio-MailScanner: Judged to be clean X-MailScanner-From: pine@coppit.org X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, X_AUTH_WARNING 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Fri, 30 Jul 2004, Nancy McGough wrote: > --- begin excerpt --- > One of the keys to my deflexion strategy is to have the spam score (_HITS_) > inserted into the beginning of the Subject header. This makes it easy to > order messages by score because I can simply do a sort-by-subject in my mail > client. I recommend that you surround the Subject tag with braces (squiggly > brackets) because 1) these tagged Subjects will then sort below almost all > other Subjects when the Subjects are sorted using an ASCII sort (because { is > charcter 123 out of 127); and 2) a popular alternative, square brackets, will > not work in an IMAP sort because the IMAP sort and thread specification says > to ignore text that is in square brackets during a sort. If you want to muck > around with the format of the _HITS_ token, see Keith C. Ivey's message Re: > adding SPAM hits score to headers in the SA mailing list. > --- end excerpt --- For what it's worth, you can use patterns to set the scores of the email in pine, then sort by score. Unfortunately, it's tedious without pattern matching. Here's a bit from my .pinerc: patterns-scores2=LIT:pattern="/NICK=Spam 10/ARBX-Spam-Status=hits=1.,hits=2.,hit s=3.,hits=4.,hits=5.,hits=6.,hits=7.,hits=8.,hits=9./FLDTYPE=EMAIL" action="/ISS CORE=1/SCORE=10", LIT:pattern="/NICK=Spam 20/ARBX-Spam-Status=hits=10.,hits=11.,hits=12.,h its=13.,hits=14.,hits=15.,hits=16.,hits=17.,hits=18.,hits=19./FLDTYPE=EMAIL" act ion="/ISSCORE=1/SCORE=20", LIT:pattern="/NICK=Spam 30/ARBX-Spam-Status=hits=20.,hits=21.,hits=22.,h its=23.,hits=24.,hits=25.,hits=26.,hits=27.,hits=28.,hits=29./FLDTYPE=EMAIL" act ion="/ISSCORE=1/SCORE=30", LIT:pattern="/NICK=Spam 40/ARBX-Spam-Status=hits=30.,hits=31.,hits=32.,h its=33.,hits=34.,hits=35.,hits=36.,hits=37.,hits=38.,hits=39./FLDTYPE=EMAIL" act ion="/ISSCORE=1/SCORE=40", LIT:pattern="/NICK=Spam 50/ARBX-Spam-Status=hits=40.,hits=41.,hits=42.,h its=43.,hits=44.,hits=45.,hits=46.,hits=47.,hits=48.,hits=49./FLDTYPE=EMAIL" act ion="/ISSCORE=1/SCORE=50", LIT:pattern="/NICK=Spam 60/ARBX-Spam-Status=hits=50.,hits=51.,hits=52.,h its=53.,hits=54.,hits=55.,hits=56.,hits=57.,hits=58.,hits=59./FLDTYPE=EMAIL" act ion="/ISSCORE=1/SCORE=50", LIT:pattern="/NICK=Spam 70/ARBX-Spam-Status=hits=60.,hits=61.,hits=62.,h its=63.,hits=64.,hits=65.,hits=66.,hits=67.,hits=68.,hits=69./FLDTYPE=EMAIL" act ion="/ISSCORE=1/SCORE=50" David _____________________________________________________________________ David Coppit david@coppit.org The College of William and Mary http://coppit.org/ "Use 'logout' to leave this shell" -- You know what I want. Just do it! From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jul 30 09:01:06 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:01:06 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6UG15xQ018353; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:01:05 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6UG14GG003071 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:01:05 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6UG0kEj012872; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:00:46 -0700 Received: from mxe2.u.washington.edu (mxe2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6UFxhP2104296 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 08:59:43 -0700 Received: from concept.ocis.temple.edu (concept.ocis.temple.edu [155.247.27.102]) by mxe2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6UFxg7U024055 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 08:59:42 -0700 Received: from concept.ocis.temple.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by concept.ocis.temple.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6UFxfk8005264 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:59:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (sbirl@localhost) by concept.ocis.temple.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10/Submit) with ESMTP id i6UFxfRi005261 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:59:41 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:59:41 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: Pine Discussion Forum Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "S.A. Birl" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Subject sort rules? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: concept.ocis.temple.edu: sbirl owned process doing -bs X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-CONCEPT-TEMPLE-EDU: sbirl at concept dot temple dot edu composed this message. X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=X, Probability=10%, Report='PRIORITY_NO_NAME 0.716, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, X_AUTH_WARNING 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, __HAS_MSGID 0, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Jul 30, Nancy McGough (nospam-nm-reverse-spam-filter@ii.deflexion.com.ns...: Nancy: On 29 Jul 2004 David Coppit (no-spam-pine@coppit.org.ns) wrote: Nancy: > Nancy: > I tag viruses and spam using [SPAM] and [VIRUS]. I'd like to deal with Nancy: > all Nancy: > the spam first, then all the viruses. I think I can just use {SPAM} Nancy: > and Nancy: > {VIRUS} instead and pine will sort them like I want--I'll test it out. Nancy: Nancy: Nancy: Sorting square bracketed text in the Subject is not just a pine issue, Nancy: but a genereal IMAP issue. I discuss this on my Reverse Spam Filtering Nancy: page in this section: Nancy: Nancy: Sure it would be great to replace the square brackets with braces, but ListServ does not do that (I assume this since I do not admin a ListServ server). It would be nice to have an option in Pine, multiple checkbox perhaps, to consider [] in the beginning of the subject line. It would help when sorting by Subject if a person is subscribed to multiple ListServ lists, such as myself. Thanks Birl --- Please do not CC me responses to my own posts. I'll read the responses on the list. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jul 30 09:02:51 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:02:51 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6UG2osa018442; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:02:50 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6UG2neB003142 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:02:50 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6UG2Rnj005100; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:02:27 -0700 Received: from mxi2.u.washington.edu (mxi2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.12]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6UG1iKe115800 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:01:44 -0700 Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1]) by mxi2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6UG1hwr024514 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:01:43 -0700 Received: from zeno2.math.washington.edu (zeno2.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.5]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i6UG1ZYS005331; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:01:37 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:01:35 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Subject sort rules? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Nancy McGough X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.6; VAE 6.26.0.10; VDF 6.26.0.51 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** Nancy McGough (ansnm-reverse-spam-filter@ii.deflexion.com.not) wrote in...: :) One of the keys to my deflexion strategy is to have the spam score :) (_HITS_) inserted into the beginning of the Subject header. This makes :) it easy to order messages by score because I can simply do a :) sort-by-subject in my mail client. This would imply that messages with score 100 would be (in this sort) before those whose score is 40 which are before than those whose score is 7. Is this something that you ignore intentionally? (this is true even if you surround all scores with the same tag, like "{" and "}"). Do you ignore this because messages with these scores have to be spam?. If you want to have the sort by subject respect the sort by score then you need to add more stuff there. The trick consists in making *all* scores have the same number of digits, so for example, if SA does not give scores bigger than 1000, then add 1000 to the score that SA gives you, so for example, a score of 7 in SA would be transformed to 1007, 100 would be transformed to 1100, and so on. Now all scores would be sorted correctly, and your trick of adding "{" to it would be more useful. -- Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jul 30 09:27:23 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:27:23 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6UGRMwD019417; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:27:22 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6UGRKKV019906 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:27:22 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6UGR41R012908; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:27:05 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6UGQTr0115874 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:26:29 -0700 Received: from smarty.dreamhost.com (smarty.dreamhost.com [66.33.216.24]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6UGQTFD029514 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:26:29 -0700 Received: from zebes.dreamhost.com (zebes.dreamhost.com [66.33.193.52]) by smarty.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B688E13F68F; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:26:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by zebes.dreamhost.com (Postfix, from userid 5887) id C857A908FD; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:26:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zebes.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C457FFAE1; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:26:28 +0100 (BST) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:26:28 +0100 (BST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Nancy McGough To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Subject sort rules? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Message-Flag: Worried about bugs & viruses? Switch to Mac/Unix/PC Pine - info @ www.ii.com X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On 30 Jul 2004 Eduardo Chappa (chappa@math.washington.edu) wrote: > > :) One of the keys to my deflexion strategy is to have the spam score > :) (_HITS_) inserted into the beginning of the Subject header. This makes > :) it easy to order messages by score because I can simply do a > :) sort-by-subject in my mail client. > > This would imply that messages with score 100 would be (in this sort) > before those whose score is 40 which are before than those whose score is > 7. Is this something that you ignore intentionally? (this is true even if > you surround all scores with the same tag, like "{" and "}"). Do you > ignore this because messages with these scores have to be spam?. Yes, I /dev/null everything with a SpamAssassin score of 10 or more (so the ASCII sort works). If anyone is interested, I talk about this on my Procmail Quick Start in these sections: And I talk about how to get the score in the Subject header here: And I talk about what I'm doing now, which is a complete hack, here: Feedback is welcome! Nancy Infinite Ink www.ii.com From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jul 30 09:29:20 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:29:20 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6UGTJYn019525; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:29:19 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6UGTH46020013 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:29:18 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6UGT2Fw015542; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:29:02 -0700 Received: from mxu8.u.washington.edu (mxu8.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.142]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6UGSdfi123368 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:28:39 -0700 Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1]) by mxu8.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6UGScTe013947 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:28:38 -0700 Received: from zeno2.math.washington.edu (zeno2.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.5]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i6UGScYS007158 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:28:38 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:28:38 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Subject sort rules? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.6; VAE 6.26.0.10; VDF 6.26.0.51 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** S.A. Birl (anssbirl@temple.edu.not) wrote in the pine-info list today: :) Sure it would be great to replace the square brackets with braces, but :) ListServ does not do that (I assume this since I do not admin a :) ListServ server). :) :) It would be nice to have an option in Pine, multiple checkbox perhaps, :) to consider [] in the beginning of the subject line. :) :) It would help when sorting by Subject if a person is subscribed to :) multiple ListServ lists, such as myself. I like the idea that pine removes information enclosed between "[" and "]" before it sorts by subject since otherwise messages in the same thread could be miles away in the folder and for me it is more important to have messages in the same thread nearby when I sort by subject. If what you are looking for is a way to group messages from the same mailing list (which you then can sort by subject), then you can do it in another way. Simply use the select command. For example, to select messages from this mailing list I would use the command: ; T A "Sender: PINE-INFO" You could also try to search for some other header, if the Sender header is not what identifies your mailing list. You can not select messages by the content of an arbitrary header unless you patch Pine, you have to use the "All Text" option, but it should be fast in most storage systems. -- Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jul 30 10:09:55 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:09:55 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6UH9sJj021141; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:09:54 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6UH9rro021720 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:09:54 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6UH9d4X016254; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:09:39 -0700 Received: from mxu8.u.washington.edu (mxu8.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.142]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6UH97fN084866 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:09:07 -0700 Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1]) by mxu8.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6UH96kw022710 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:09:06 -0700 Received: from zeno2.math.washington.edu (zeno2.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.5]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i6UH96YS010231 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:09:06 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:09:05 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Subject sort rules? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.6; VAE 6.26.0.10; VDF 6.26.0.51 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 I wrote: :) If what you are looking for is a way to group messages from the same :) mailing list (which you then can sort by subject), then you can do it :) in another way. Simply use the select command. Since I wrote this, I realized that the select command will not ignore the text enclosed between "[" and "]" when selecting messages by subject, so and easier way to do this is simply ; T S "[List Tag]" Once you have selected them, you can sort them in any way you want. -- Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Jul 30 12:52:53 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:52:53 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6UJqqDf027969; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:52:52 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6UJqpfR012531 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:52:52 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6UJpCJY015928; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:51:13 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6UJoRnJ084840 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:50:27 -0700 Received: from moultrie.cse.sc.edu (moultrie.cse.sc.edu [129.252.138.7]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6UJoQmq019933 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:50:26 -0700 Received: from pollux (pollux.cse.sc.edu [129.252.130.113]) by moultrie.cse.sc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id F08E71E5F7 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 15:50:25 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:50:25 -0500 (CDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Gopi Sundaram To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: charsets (4.61) In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: gopalan@pollux X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __KNOWN_SPAMMER_ADDRESS_2 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 James.Cummings@ota.ahds.ac.uk wrote: > I'd just like to be able to read the email with all the characters the > user sent. Here's what I do: (M)ain (S)etup (C)onfig, display-filters And add a filter for each charset you want. For iso-8859-1, I have: _CHARSET(iso-8859-1)_ /usr/bin/iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf-8 That says that when a message is in that charset, iconv will be invoked to convert it to utf-8 (which is what my terminal is configured for). You will probably want one for windows-1252 and others. Check iconv's documentation to see if it supports that charset, and make sure that the target charset is what your terminal is set to. -- Gopi Sundaram http://www.zrox.net/Mail/Pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sat Jul 31 02:09:23 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 31 Jul 2004 02:09:23 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6V99MwD018868; Sat, 31 Jul 2004 02:09:22 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6V99LLA020454 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 31 Jul 2004 02:09:21 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i6V97fxN007476; Sat, 31 Jul 2004 02:07:41 -0700 Received: from mxe1.u.washington.edu (mxe1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.136]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6V96nPB110852 for ; Sat, 31 Jul 2004 02:06:50 -0700 Received: from mail.cboss.ru (mail.cboss.ru [195.245.232.9]) by mxe1.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i6V96kwm008881 for ; Sat, 31 Jul 2004 02:06:47 -0700 Received: from alemate.int.cboss.ru ([10.2.131.6]) (authenticated aaleks bits=0) by mail.cboss.ru with ESMTP id i6V96Sv8007124 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 31 Jul 2004 13:06:32 +0400 (MSD) Message-Id: Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 13:06:28 +0400 (MSD) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Alexander V Alekseev To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: charsets (4.61) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: alex@alemate.int.cboss.ru X-Archived: msg.XXiibWRa@oas-db.srv.cboss.ru X-Archived: msg.XXCyQGGb@mail X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __KNOWN_SPAMMER_ADDRESS_2 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello! On Fri, 30 Jul 2004, Gopi Sundaram wrote: > On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 James.Cummings@ota.ahds.ac.uk wrote: > > > I'd just like to be able to read the email with all the characters the > > user sent. > > Here's what I do: > > (M)ain (S)etup (C)onfig, display-filters > > And add a filter for each charset you want. For iso-8859-1, I have: > > _CHARSET(iso-8859-1)_ /usr/bin/iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf-8 > > That says that when a message is in that charset, iconv will be invoked > to convert it to utf-8 (which is what my terminal is configured for). > > You will probably want one for windows-1252 and others. Check iconv's > documentation to see if it supports that charset, and make sure that the > target charset is what your terminal is set to. But you will have troubles with such config. If you postpone converted message, it will have original charset name in headers, but characters in new charset. So, it will be converted twice, if you continue editing it. (If you postpone it again, it will be converted once more, and so on.) The only way (at least for me) to read such mail is to use Bernhard Kaindl patch available from http://www.suse.de/~bk/pine/ . There were many talkings on it in this list, you can look in archivs. Bye. Alex. --